2026-16406: Security Zone; U.S. Coast Guard Base, Los Angeles Harbor Main Channel, Los Angeles, CA
Public comment closed · opened August 12, 2026.
Get alerted when the next rule lands
New rules open for comment on their own schedule. Pick how you want to hear about them — we email you when one appears.
Publishing to members? Embed a live rule tracker on your own site — the proposed rules in your area and the comment deadlines closing on them, updating themselves. Free, one line of HTML.
Create a free account & build one →Summary
The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a permanent security zone extending 40 yards into the navigable waters of the main channel of Los Angeles Harbor including the entire perimeter of the Coast Guard Base on Terminal Island. This action is necessary for the security of military service members on vessels, and military members and government property on Terminal Island. All persons and vessels would be prohibited from entering, transiting through, or anchoring in the proposed security zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Los Angeles-Long Beach. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
The agency’s own summary, as published.
The rule, in full
1,679 words as published, August 12, 2026. View the original →
Federal Register, Volume 91 Issue 154 (Wednesday, August 12, 2026) [Federal Register Volume 91, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 12, 2026)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 52037-52038] From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov] [FR Doc No: 2026-16406] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG-2026-0763] RIN 1625-AA87 Security Zone; U.S. Coast Guard Base, Los Angeles Harbor Main Channel, Los Angeles, CA
Agency
Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security.
Action
Notice of proposed rulemaking. -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary
The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a permanent security zone extending 40 yards into the navigable waters of the main channel of Los Angeles Harbor including the entire perimeter of the Coast Guard Base on Terminal Island. This action is necessary for the security of military service members on vessels, and military members and government property on Terminal Island. All persons and vessels would be prohibited from entering, transiting through, or anchoring in the proposed security zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Los Angeles-Long Beach. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
Dates
Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before September 11, 2026.
Addresses
To submit comments and view available documents, go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for USCG-2026-0763.
For Further Information Contact
If you have questions about this proposed rule, contact LCDR Anthony Solares, Sector Los Angeles--Long Beach Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 310- 521-3860, email [email protected].
Supplementary Information
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations COTP Captain of the Port DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Sec. Section U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background and Authority
In the past, a variety of activities directly adjacent to or subsurface in the vicinity of Coast Guard assets have required immediate response actions to safeguard the personnel and property of U.S. Coast Guard Base Los Angeles-Long Beach on Terminal Island within the main channel of Los Angeles Harbor. The Captain of the Port (COTP) Los Angeles-Long Beach has identified a need to create a permanent security zone to address safety and security risks for personnel and property. Therefore, the COTP is proposing this rule under the authority in 46 U.S.C. 70051 and 70124, which is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters within the security zone.
III. Discussion of the Rule
This proposed rule would establish a security zone on October 1, 2026. The security zone would cover all navigable waters within 40 yards of the Coast Guard Base on Terminal Island. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter the security zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or their designated representative. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders.
A. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. Vessel traffic will be able to safely transit within the main channel. This regulation will only impact a small area around the Coast Guard Base. In addition, the Coast Guard will issue a Local Notice to Mariners (LNM) and Marine Safety Information Bulletin (MSIB) which will notify entities of the security zone and allows vessels to request permission to enter the regulated area from the COTP. If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), if this proposed rule will affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions, contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send [[Page 52038]] comments to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards by calling 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
B. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501- 3520).
C. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in that Order. Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
As required by The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538), the Coast Guard certifies that this proposed rule will not result in an annual expenditure of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted for inflation) by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector.
E. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule is a security zone. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking and will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation. Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments at https://www.regulations.gov. To do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2026-0763 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate instructions. Viewing material in the docket. To view available documents, find the docket as described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting & Related Material'' in the Document Type column. We will post public comments in our online docket. Additional information is on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked Questions web page. Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020). List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04- 1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.4. 0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-243 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-243 Security Zone; U.S. Coast Guard Base, Los Angeles Harbor Main Channel, Los Angeles, CA. (a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All waters of Los Angeles Harbor Main Channel, from surface to bottom, encompassed by a line connecting the following points beginning at 33[deg]43.730' N 118[deg]16.220' W; thence to 33[deg]43.304' N 118[deg]16.062' W; thence to 33[deg]43.314' N 118[deg]16.013' W; thence to 33[deg]43.284' N 118[deg]16.000' W; thence to 33[deg]43.271' N 118[deg]16.078' W; thence to 33[deg]43.722' N 118[deg]16.262' W; thence to and along the shoreline back to the beginning point. These coordinates are based on the World Geodetic System (WGS 84). (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP) Los Angeles--Long Beach in the enforcement of the security zone. (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general security zone regulations in subpart D of this part, you may not enter the security zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's Designated Representative. (2) To request permission to enter this security zone, contact United States Coast Guard Sector Los Angeles--Long Beach Command Center at 310-521-3801. Those in the security zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or Designated Representative. (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced starting on October 1, 2026. Stacey L. Crecy, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Los Angeles--Long Beach. [FR Doc. 2026-16406 Filed 8-11-26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
What this changes
Amends 1 part of the Code of Federal Regulations — the standing rules this notice rewrites.
Rulemaking docket
-
Proposed Rule August 12, 2026Security Zone; U.S. Coast Guard Base, Los Angeles Harbor Main Channel, Los Angeles, CA
-
Supporting & Related Material August 12, 2026DSS-USCG-2026-25759
-
Supporting & Related Material August 12, 2026DSS-USCG-2026-25759
-
Proposed Rule August 12, 2026Security Zone; U.S. Coast Guard Base, Los Angeles Harbor Main Channel, Los Angeles, CA
-
Rule October 07, 2026Security Zone; U.S. Coast Guard Base, Los Angeles Harbor Main Channel, Los Angeles, CA
-
Supporting & Related Material October 07, 2026REC_DSS_USCG_2026_25759_Final
Public comments
What people are saying
-
Anonymous Anonymous 2026-09-14
“The Coast Guard cites 46 U.S.C. § 70051 alongside standard security zone authority § 70124 for the permeant closure of the security zone. Where is the Presidential emergency declaration for LA Harbor? Citing emergency war powers for routine port maintenance is a government overreach, especially post Loper Bright. The agency states that permanent land-and-water restrictiion is based on generic unspecified "past activities directly adjacent to or subsurface" that required "immediate response actions." The rest of the docket contains zero incident dates, threat counts, or severity assessments....”
2,219 more characters
-
The Native Claim Firm 2026-09-14
“See attached file(s)”
-
Steven Singleton 2026-09-03
“This proposed security zone around U.S. Coast Guard Base Los Angeles-Long Beach is narrowly drawn, limited to 40 yards of the Main Channel, and pairs the restriction with a specific contact number for entry requests. The zone's most significant gap is procedural, not geographic. Proposed Sec. 165.T11-243(c)(2) bars entry "unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's Designated Representative," but sets no standard for granting or denying a request, no response-time expectation, and no path to challenge a denial. A commercial harbor tug, a fishing vessel with a time-sensitive catch, or a harb...”
2,626 more characters
-
Ronnie Yantani 2026-08-14
“See attached file(s) To all it may concern with utmost mutual respect, EXECUTIVE FORENSIC SUMMARY & THE MACROECONOMIC CONTEXT The foundation of modern global commerce, sovereign wealth management, and intercontinental supply chain logistics relies upon the absolute and unyielding synchronization of international timekeeping standards. A systemic discrepancy of +0.048 seconds (48 milliseconds) across decentralized communication networks is not a superficial anomaly; it represents a catastrophic structural fissure within the evidentiary standardization required for the functioning of global m...”
1,425 more characters
Read all comments on Regulations.gov →
Comment volume from Regulations.gov; the comment-submission API was retired in 2025, so comments are filed on Regulations.gov directly.
Documents
- Full text (Federal Register) · August 12, 2026
Don't miss the comment window
One Click Politics alerts you on every deadline, hearing, and rule change.
See all rules with comments due soon →