ny-SUN-30-26-00011-EP: Amend vehicle limits as to height and weight and set Weigh-in- Motion (WIM) violation monitoring with flat-rate per violation

I.D. No. SUN-30-26-00011-EP. Final rule as compared with last published rule: No changes. Text of rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from: Lisa S. Campo, State University of New York, H. Carl McCall SUNY Building, Albany, NY 12246, (518) 320-1400, email: Lisa.Campo@SUNY.edu Assessment of Public Comment The agency received no public comment. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority NOTICE OFADOPTION Amend Vehicle Limits as to Height and Weight and Set Weigh-In- Motion (WIM) Violation Monitoring with Flat-Rate Per Violation I.D. No. TBA-24-26-00001-A Filing No. 968 Filing Date: 2026-10-08 Effective Date: 2026-09-30 PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE State Administrative Pro- cedureAct, NOTICE is hereby given of the following action: Action taken: Repeal of section 1021.2; addition of new 1021.2 to Title 21 NYCRR. Statutory authority: PublicAuthority Law, section 553(5) Subject: Amend vehicle limits as to height and weight and set Weigh-in- Motion (WIM) violation monitoring with flat-rate per violation. Purpose: To amend the height and weight limitations for vehicles on TBTAfacilities and set a $650 flat rate for WIM violations. Text or summary was published in the June 17, 2026 issue of the Register, I.D. No. TBA-24-26-00001-P. Final rule as compared with last published rule: No changes. Text of rule and any required statements and analyses may be obtained from: Daniela Infield, Senior Counsel, Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, 2 Broadway, 24th Floor, NewYork, NY10004, (646) 752-7620, email: Daniela.Infield@mtahq.org Initial Review of Rule As a rule that requires a RFA, RAFA or JIS, this rule will be initially reviewed in the calendar year 2029, which is no later than the 3rd year af- ter the year in which this rule is being adopted. Assessment of Public Comment Summary: Public Input Received: The MTA received one written testimony submitted through the on-line portal /duplicated via postal mail; and oral testimony from two public speakers during the hearing. 19 Rule MakingActivities Of the three testimonies, one was in favor and one was neutral on the policy but did raise concerns about whether the fines may be too high es- pecially for the deaf community. The third commenter expressed support for conducting reasonable enforcement of weight restrictions, protecting critical infrastructure, holding carriers that operate above legal limits without authorization accountable, and updating the regulations for verti- cal clearances to reflect conditions, but did raise concerns about the need for the City of New York to unfreeze and modernize New York City’s overweight permit system. 1) Zach Miller Vice President of Government Affairs for the Trucking Association of New York (TANY) August 17th, 2026 Forest Hills New York On-Line\Posted Mail Com- ment D The Trucking Association of New York (TANY) supports reasonable enforcement of weight restrictions, carriers operating above legal limits without authorization should be held