Massachusetts 192nd Legislature (2021-2022) Status: In Committee 4 D cosponsors

S 2671 — An Act relative to forfeiture reform

Last action — Amendment (as recommended by the committee on Senate Ways and Means) adopted, as amended

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 10, 2022. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.

Prognosis

Stalled 26% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 8 sponsors

    1 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 D).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Senate, February 10, 2022 -- The committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred the petitions (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 965) of Cynthia Stone Creem and Elizabeth A. Malia for legislation relative to criminal forfeiture; (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1452) of James Arciero and others relative to asset forfeiture of property; (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1724) of David Henry Argosky LeBoeuf, David Allen Robertson and Elizabeth A. Malia establishing a right to counsel in civil asset forfeiture cases; (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1757) of Jay D. Livingstone, Elizabeth A. Malia and Tami L. Gouveia relative to human trafficking forfeiture reform; and (accompanied by bill, House, No. 4279) (subject to Joint Rule 12) of Carlos González, David M. Rogers and Russell E. Holmes relative to civil asset forfeiture, reports the accompanying bill (Senate, No. 2671).

Bill Text

We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.

Read S 2671 on the official Massachusetts source →

Action History

  1. Amendment (as recommended by the committee on Senate Ways and Means) adopted, as amended

  2. New draft substituted, see S2944

  3. Motion to lay on the table negatived

  4. Motion to lay on the table pending and postponed to the next session

  5. Motion to lay on the table negatived

  6. Motion to lay on the table pending and postponed to the next session

  7. Read second

  8. Committee recommended ought to pass with an amendment, substituting a new draft, see S2944

  9. Placed in the Orders of the Day for Thursday, June 23, 2022

  10. Order relative to subject matter adopted

  11. Also based on S2105

  12. Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on Senate Ways and Means

  13. New draft of S965, H1452, H1724, H1757 and H4279

  14. Reported from the committee on The Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 196 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Joint Committee on the Judiciary

Co-sponsors (7)

Not signed on (196)

196 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 196 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does S 2671 do?
Senate, February 10, 2022 -- The committee on the Judiciary, to whom was referred the petitions (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 965) of Cynthia Stone Creem and Elizabeth A. Malia for legislation relative to criminal forfeiture; (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1452) of James Arciero and others relative to asset forfeiture of property; (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1724) of David Henry Argosky LeBoeuf, David Allen Robertson and Elizabeth A. Malia establishing a right to counsel in civil asset forfeiture cases; (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1757) of Jay D. Livingstone, Elizabeth A. Malia and Tami L. Gouveia relative to human trafficking forfeiture reform; and (accompanied by bill, House, No. 4279) (subject to Joint Rule 12) of Carlos González, David M. Rogers and Russell E. Holmes relative to civil asset forfeiture, reports the accompanying bill (Senate, No. 2671).
Who sponsors S 2671?
S 2671 is sponsored by Joint Committee on the Judiciary, Cynthia Stone Creem (Democrat), James Arciero (Democrat), Elizabeth A. Malia, Sheriff Peter Koutoujian, Adam G. Hinds, Patrick Joseph Kearney (Democrat), and James M. Murphy (Democrat).
What is the current status of S 2671?
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 10, 2022. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track S 2671?
Track S 2671 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on S 2671

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of S 2671

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →