Massachusetts 192nd Legislature (2021-2022) Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 1 D · 1 R cosponsors

S 393 — An Act relative to strengthening background checks

Last action — Accompanied a new draft, see S2883

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced March 29, 2021. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.

Prognosis

Advancing 36% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (1 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

By Mr. Timilty, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 393) of Walter F. Timilty, James M. Murphy and Hannah Kane for legislation to strengthen the background checks process. Education.

Bill Text

We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.

Read S 393 on the official Massachusetts source →

Action History

  1. Accompanied a new draft, see S2883

  2. House concurred

  3. Amendment (changing reporting date to Monday May 23, 2022) adopted, pending concurrence

  4. Reporting date extended to Monday May 23, 2022, pending concurrence

  5. Reporting date extended to Sunday May 15, 2022, pending concurrence

  6. Senate concurred

  7. Reporting date extended to Sunday May 1, 2022, pending concurrence

  8. Hearing scheduled for 11/23/2021 from 11:00 AM-05:00 PM in Virtual Hearing

  9. House concurred

  10. Referred to the committee on Education

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 201 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Walter F. Timilty

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (201)

201 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 201 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does S 393 do?
By Mr. Timilty, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 393) of Walter F. Timilty, James M. Murphy and Hannah Kane for legislation to strengthen the background checks process. Education.
Who sponsors S 393?
S 393 is sponsored by Walter F. Timilty, James M. Murphy (Democrat), and Hannah Kane (Republican).
What is the current status of S 393?
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced March 29, 2021. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track S 393?
Track S 393 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on S 393

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of S 393

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →