provide for certain bonds for the construction of courthouses.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 182 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 182.
You're tracking SB 182
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 182 — provide for certain bonds for the construction of courthouses.
Last action — Local Government Deferred to the 41st legislative day, Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 2.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SB 182 on the official South Dakota source →Action History
-
Local Government Deferred to the 41st legislative day, Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 2.
-
Scheduled for hearing
-
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Local Government S.J. 155
Sponsors
- McCleerey · Primary
- Bordeaux · Primary
- Ring · Primary
- Nesiba · Primary
- Wismer · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →5 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 100 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (5)
- McCleerey
- Bordeaux
- Ring
- Nesiba
- Wismer
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (100)
100 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 100 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 29% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cammack | — | Yea |
| Ewing | — | Yea |
| Jensen (Phil) | — | Nay |
| Wismer | — | Yea |
| Youngberg | — | Not Voting |
| Helene Duhamel | Republican | Yea |
| Kyle Schoenfish | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 182?
- SB 182 is sponsored by McCleerey, Bordeaux, Ring, Nesiba, and Wismer.
- What is the current status of SB 182?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 182?
- Track SB 182 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 182
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 182
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →