require that local government bond elections be held in conjunction with the primary or general election in...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 162 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 162.
You're tracking SB 162
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 162 — require that local government bond elections be held in conjunction with the primary or general election in even-numbered years.
Last action — Local Government Deferred to the 41st legislative day, Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 2. S.J. 326
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SB 162 on the official South Dakota source →Action History
-
Local Government Deferred to the 41st legislative day, Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 2. S.J. 326
-
Local Government Do Pass, Failed, YEAS 2, NAYS 4.
-
Scheduled for hearing
-
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Local Government S.J. 228
Sponsors
- Brunner · Primary
- Bolin · Primary
- Jack Kolbeck · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (3)
- Brunner
- Bolin
- Jack Kolbeck Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 29% | 57% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cammack | — | Nay |
| Steinhauer | — | Nay |
| DiSanto | — | Yea |
| Jensen (Phil) | — | Not Voting |
| Ewing | — | Nay |
| Wismer | — | Nay |
| Al Novstrup | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 29% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cammack | — | Yea |
| Steinhauer | — | Yea |
| DiSanto | — | Nay |
| Jensen (Phil) | — | Not Voting |
| Ewing | — | Yea |
| Wismer | — | Yea |
| Al Novstrup | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 162?
- SB 162 is sponsored by Brunner, Bolin, and Jack Kolbeck (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 162?
- This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 162?
- Track SB 162 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 162
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 162
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →