Pennsylvania 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate Bipartisan · 5 R · 2 D cosponsors

SB 85 — An Act amending the act of December 7, 1982 (P.L.784, No.225), known as the Dog Law, in licenses, tags and kennels, further providing for transfer of dog licenses or tags and other licensing requirements and for service dogs and dogs used by municipal or State Police departments.

Last action — Referred to AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

66 added · 68 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to Bill SB 85 clarify the process for transferring dog ownership and licensing between counties. Key changes include designating the county treasurer as the responsible party for processing these transfers instead of a previously mentioned agent. This streamlining helps to ensure that owners have a clear point of contact for handling their dog’s registration, making the process easier and potentially reducing administrative confusion. Overall, these changes aim to simplify the dog licensing process for pet owners.

→
Previous
Latest
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
PRINTER'S NO.
63 PRINTER'S NO.
63 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of 2019 No.
2004 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of 2019 No.
WARD, DINNIMAN, YUDICHAK, BROOKS AND BREWSTER, JANUARY 24, 2019 AS AMENDED ON THIRD CONSIDERATION, SEPTEMBER 21, 2020 AN ACT Amending the act of December 7, 1982 (P.L.784, No.225), entitled "An act relating to dogs, regulating the keeping of dogs;
WARD AND DINNIMAN, JANUARY 24, 2019 REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS, JANUARY 24, 2019 AN ACT Amending the act of December 7, 1982 (P.L.784, No.225), entitled "An act relating to dogs, regulating the keeping of dogs;
providing for payment of damages by the Commonwealth in certain cases and the liability of the duties on certain State and local officers and employees;
providing for payment of damages by the Commonwealth in certain cases and the liability of the owner or keeper of dogs for such damages;
and providing penalties;
imposing powers and providing penalties;
and creating a Dog Law Restricted Account," in licenses, tags and kennels, further providing for transfer of dog licenses or tags and other licensing requirements and for service dogs and dogs used by municipal or State Police departments.
and creating a Dog Law Restrictedes;
Account," in licenses, tags and kennels, further providing for transfer of dog licenses or tags and other licensing requirements and for service dogs and dogs used by municipal or State Police departments.
(1) Whenever the ownership or possession of [any] a dog is permanently transferred from one person to another within the same county, the license of [such] the dog may be likewise transferred, upon application to [an agent <-- AUTHORIZED under section 200(a)[.
(1) Whenever the ownership or possession of [any] a dog is permanently transferred from one person to another within the same county, the license of [such] the dog may be likewise transferred, upon application to [an agent under section 200(a).
Such application] the, <-- INCLUDING A county treasurer.
Such application] the county treasurer.
[The issuing agent] <-- (4) The county treasurer shall charge and retain $1 for [such] the transfer application.
[The issuing agent] (4) The county treasurer shall charge and retain $1 for [such] the transfer application.
(b) Dog moved to another county.--Whenever [any] a dog licensed in one county is permanently moved to another county, [an issuing agent] the county treasurer of the county where the <-- dog license was issued shall, upon the application of the owner or keeper of [such] the dog, certify [such] the dog license to [an agent] the county treasurer of the county to which the dog <-- is moved.
(b) Dog moved to another county.--Whenever [any] a dog licensed in one county is permanently moved to another county, [an issuing agent] the county treasurer of the county where the dog license was issued shall, upon the application of the owner or keeper of [such] the dog, certify [such] the dog license to [an agent] the county treasurer of the county to which the dog is moved.
[Such] THE agent] The county treasurer shall <-- thereupon, and upon the payment of a fee of $1 for the use of the [agent] county treasurer, issue a dog license and tag for <-- 20190SB0085PN2004 - 2 - [such] the dog in the county to which it is moved.
[Such agent] The county treasurer shall thereupon, and upon the payment of a fee of $1 for the use of the [agent] county treasurer, issue a dog license and tag for [such] the dog in the county to which it is moved.
(c) Owners of unlicensed dogs.--[Any] A person other than as exempt in section 206, becoming the owner of [any] a dog three months old or older, which has not already been licensed shall forthwith apply for and secure a license for [such] the dog under the provisions of this act.
20190SB0085PN0063 - 2 - (c) Owners of unlicensed dogs.--[Any] A person other than as exempt in section 206, becoming the owner of [any] a dog three months old or older, which has not already been licensed shall forthwith apply for and secure a license for [such] the dog under the provisions of this act.
(ii) A municipal or State Police department or POLICE agency using a dog in the performance of the <-- functions or duties of the department or agency.
(ii) A municipal or State Police department or agency using a dog in the performance of the functions or duties of the department or agency.
(3) For purposes of paragraph (1)(iii), a letter on official letterhead from the respective police chief, fire chief, sheriff or director or authorized agent of the 20190SB0085PN2004 - 3 - department, agency or office providing the services, along with evidence that the dog is a service dog, shall accompany the application under section 201.
(3) For purposes of paragraph (1)(iii), a letter on official letterhead from the respective police chief, fire chief, sheriff or director or authorized agent of the department, agency or office providing the services, along 20190SB0085PN0063 - 3 - with evidence that the dog is a service dog, shall accompany the application under section 201.
20190SB0085PN2004 - 4 -
20190SB0085PN0063 - 4 -
View plain text versions (2)

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Referred to AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS

  2. Third consideration and final passage

  3. PN 2004 Amended on third consideration

  4. Removed from table

  5. Laid on the table

  6. Re-reported as committed

  7. Re-referred to APPROPRIATIONS

  8. Second consideration

  9. First consideration

  10. Reported as committed

  11. PN 0063 Referred to AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 241 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (11)

Not signed on (241)

241 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 241 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

FINAL PASSAGE

Passed 49 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 17000
Unaffiliated 19000
Democratic 13001
Total 49001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (50)
Member Party Vote
ARNOLD — Yea
AUMENT — Yea
BLAKE — Yea
BREWSTER — Yea
BROWNE — Yea
CORMAN — Yea
DINNIMAN — Yea
DISANTO — Yea
FARNESE — Yea
GORDNER — Yea
IOVINO — Yea
KILLION — Yea
LEACH — Yea
MENSCH — Yea
REGAN — Yea
SABATINA — Yea
SCARNATI — Yea
SCAVELLO — Yea
YUDICHAK — Yea
Anthony H. Williams Democratic Yea
Art Haywood Democratic Yea
Christine M. Tartaglione Democratic Yea
Jay Costa Democratic Not Voting
Judith L. Schwank Democratic Yea
Katie J. Muth Democratic Yea
Lindsey M. Williams Democratic Yea
Lisa M. Boscola Democratic Yea
Maria Collett Democratic Yea
Sharif Street Democratic Yea
Steven J. Santarsiero Democratic Yea
Timothy P. Kearney Democratic Yea
Vincent J. Hughes Democratic Yea
Wayne D. Fontana Democratic Yea
Camera Bartolotta Republican Yea
Daniel Laughlin Republican Yea
David G. Argall Republican Yea
Doug Mastriano Republican Yea
Elder A. Vogel Republican Yea
Gene Yaw Republican Yea
Joe Pittman Republican Yea
Judy Ward Republican Yea
Kathleen C. Tomlinson Republican Yea
Kim L. Ward Republican Yea
Kristin Phillips-Hill Republican Yea
Lisa Baker Republican Yea
Michele Brooks Republican Yea
Patrick J. Stefano Republican Yea
Scott E. Hutchinson Republican Yea
Scott Martin Republican Yea
Wayne Langerholc Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 24 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 9000
Unaffiliated 8000
Democratic 7000
Total 24000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (24)
Member Party Vote
BLAKE — Yea
IOVINO — Yea
KILLION — Yea
MENSCH — Yea
SCAVELLO — Yea
BROWNE — Yea
CORMAN — Yea
SCARNATI — Yea
Art Haywood Democratic Yea
Jay Costa Democratic Yea
Judith L. Schwank Democratic Yea
Maria Collett Democratic Yea
Sharif Street Democratic Yea
Steven J. Santarsiero Democratic Yea
Vincent J. Hughes Democratic Yea
Daniel Laughlin Republican Yea
David G. Argall Republican Yea
Elder A. Vogel Republican Yea
Gene Yaw Republican Yea
Joe Pittman Republican Yea
Kristin Phillips-Hill Republican Yea
Patrick J. Stefano Republican Yea
Scott Martin Republican Yea
Wayne Langerholc Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 5000
Unaffiliated 4000
Democratic 2000
Total 11000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
AUMENT — Yea
DINNIMAN — Yea
SABATINA — Yea
SCARNATI — Yea
Judith L. Schwank Democratic Yea
Sharif Street Democratic Yea
David G. Argall Republican Yea
Elder A. Vogel Republican Yea
Gene Yaw Republican Yea
Judy Ward Republican Yea
Michele Brooks Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 85?
SB 85 is sponsored by Kristin Phillips-Hill (Republican), Folmer, Judith L. Schwank (Democratic), Camera Bartolotta (Republican), Killion, Dinniman, Yudichak, Brewster, Michele Brooks (Republican), Kim L. Ward (Republican), Judy Ward (Republican), and Jay Costa (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 85?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 85?
Track SB 85 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 85

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 85

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →