SB 85 — An Act amending the act of December 7, 1982 (P.L.784, No.225), known as the Dog Law, in licenses, tags and kennels, further providing for transfer of dog licenses or tags and other licensing requirements and for service dogs and dogs used by municipal or State Police departments.
Last action — Referred to AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
66 added · 68 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to Bill SB 85 clarify the process for transferring dog ownership and licensing between counties. Key changes include designating the county treasurer as the responsible party for processing these transfers instead of a previously mentioned agent. This streamlining helps to ensure that owners have a clear point of contact for handling their dog’s registration, making the process easier and potentially reducing administrative confusion. Overall, these changes aim to simplify the dog licensing process for pet owners.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
63 PRINTER'STHE NO.GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of 2019 No.
2004 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of 2019 No.
WARD,WARD DINNIMAN, YUDICHAK, BROOKS AND BREWSTER,DINNIMAN, JANUARY 24, 2019 ASREFERRED AMENDEDTO ONAGRICULTURE THIRDAND CONSIDERATION,RURAL SEPTEMBERAFFAIRS, 21,JANUARY 202024, 2019 AN ACT Amending the act of December 7, 1982 (P.L.784, No.225), entitled "An act relating to dogs, regulating the keeping of dogs;
providing for payment of damages by the Commonwealth in certain cases and the liability of the dutiesowner onor certainkeeper Stateof anddogs localfor officerssuch anddamages; employees;
imposing powers and providing penalties;
and creating a Dog Law RestrictedRestrictedes; Account," in licenses, tags and kennels, further providing for transfer of dog licenses or tags and other licensing requirements and for service dogs and dogs used by municipal or State Police departments.
Account," in licenses, tags and kennels, further providing for transfer of dog licenses or tags and other licensing requirements and for service dogs and dogs used by municipal or State Police departments.
(1) Whenever the ownership or possession of [any] a dog is permanently transferred from one person to another within the same county, the license of [such] the dog may be likewise transferred, upon application to [an agent <-- AUTHORIZED under section 200(a)[.200(a).
Such application] the,the <-- INCLUDING A county treasurer.
[The issuing agent] <-- (4) The county treasurer shall charge and retain $1 for [such] the transfer application.
(b) Dog moved to another county.--Whenever [any] a dog licensed in one county is permanently moved to another county, [an issuing agent] the county treasurer of the county where the <-- dog license was issued shall, upon the application of the owner or keeper of [such] the dog, certify [such] the dog license to [an agent] the county treasurer of the county to which the dog <-- is moved.
[Such][Such THE agent] The county treasurer shall <-- thereupon, and upon the payment of a fee of $1 for the use of the [agent] county treasurer, issue a dog license and tag for <-- 20190SB0085PN2004 - 2 - [such] the dog in the county to which it is moved.
20190SB0085PN0063 - 2 - (c) Owners of unlicensed dogs.--[Any] A person other than as exempt in section 206, becoming the owner of [any] a dog three months old or older, which has not already been licensed shall forthwith apply for and secure a license for [such] the dog under the provisions of this act.
(ii) A municipal or State Police department or POLICE agency using a dog in the performance of the <-- functions or duties of the department or agency.
(3) For purposes of paragraph (1)(iii), a letter on official letterhead from the respective police chief, fire chief, sheriff or director or authorized agent of the 20190SB0085PN2004 - 3 - department, agency or office providing the services, along 20190SB0085PN0063 - 3 - with evidence that the dog is a service dog, shall accompany the application under section 201.
20190SB0085PN200420190SB0085PN0063 - 4 -
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Referred to AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS
-
Third consideration and final passage
-
PN 2004 Amended on third consideration
-
Removed from table
-
Laid on the table
-
Re-reported as committed
-
Re-referred to APPROPRIATIONS
-
Second consideration
-
First consideration
-
Reported as committed
-
PN 0063 Referred to AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AFFAIRS
Sponsors
- Kristin Phillips-Hill · Primary
- Folmer · Cosponsor
- Judith L. Schwank · Cosponsor
- Camera Bartolotta · Cosponsor
- Killion · Cosponsor
- Dinniman · Cosponsor
- Yudichak · Cosponsor
- Brewster · Cosponsor
- Michele Brooks · Cosponsor
- Kim L. Ward · Cosponsor
- Judy Ward · Cosponsor
- Jay Costa · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 11 co-sponsors · 241 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Kristin Phillips-Hill Republican
Co-sponsors (11)
- Folmer
- Judith L. Schwank Democratic
- Camera Bartolotta Republican
- Killion
- Dinniman
- Yudichak
- Brewster
- Michele Brooks Republican
- Kim L. Ward Republican
- Judy Ward Republican
- Jay Costa Democratic
Not signed on (241)
241 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 241 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 49 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (50)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| ARNOLD | — | Yea |
| AUMENT | — | Yea |
| BLAKE | — | Yea |
| BREWSTER | — | Yea |
| BROWNE | — | Yea |
| CORMAN | — | Yea |
| DINNIMAN | — | Yea |
| DISANTO | — | Yea |
| FARNESE | — | Yea |
| GORDNER | — | Yea |
| IOVINO | — | Yea |
| KILLION | — | Yea |
| LEACH | — | Yea |
| MENSCH | — | Yea |
| REGAN | — | Yea |
| SABATINA | — | Yea |
| SCARNATI | — | Yea |
| SCAVELLO | — | Yea |
| YUDICHAK | — | Yea |
| Anthony H. Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Art Haywood | Democratic | Yea |
| Christine M. Tartaglione | Democratic | Yea |
| Jay Costa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Judith L. Schwank | Democratic | Yea |
| Katie J. Muth | Democratic | Yea |
| Lindsey M. Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Lisa M. Boscola | Democratic | Yea |
| Maria Collett | Democratic | Yea |
| Sharif Street | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Santarsiero | Democratic | Yea |
| Timothy P. Kearney | Democratic | Yea |
| Vincent J. Hughes | Democratic | Yea |
| Wayne D. Fontana | Democratic | Yea |
| Camera Bartolotta | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Laughlin | Republican | Yea |
| David G. Argall | Republican | Yea |
| Doug Mastriano | Republican | Yea |
| Elder A. Vogel | Republican | Yea |
| Gene Yaw | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Pittman | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kathleen C. Tomlinson | Republican | Yea |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kristin Phillips-Hill | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Baker | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Brooks | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick J. Stefano | Republican | Yea |
| Scott E. Hutchinson | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne Langerholc | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (24)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BLAKE | — | Yea |
| IOVINO | — | Yea |
| KILLION | — | Yea |
| MENSCH | — | Yea |
| SCAVELLO | — | Yea |
| BROWNE | — | Yea |
| CORMAN | — | Yea |
| SCARNATI | — | Yea |
| Art Haywood | Democratic | Yea |
| Jay Costa | Democratic | Yea |
| Judith L. Schwank | Democratic | Yea |
| Maria Collett | Democratic | Yea |
| Sharif Street | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Santarsiero | Democratic | Yea |
| Vincent J. Hughes | Democratic | Yea |
| Daniel Laughlin | Republican | Yea |
| David G. Argall | Republican | Yea |
| Elder A. Vogel | Republican | Yea |
| Gene Yaw | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Pittman | Republican | Yea |
| Kristin Phillips-Hill | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick J. Stefano | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne Langerholc | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| AUMENT | — | Yea |
| DINNIMAN | — | Yea |
| SABATINA | — | Yea |
| SCARNATI | — | Yea |
| Judith L. Schwank | Democratic | Yea |
| Sharif Street | Democratic | Yea |
| David G. Argall | Republican | Yea |
| Elder A. Vogel | Republican | Yea |
| Gene Yaw | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Brooks | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 85?
- SB 85 is sponsored by Kristin Phillips-Hill (Republican), Folmer, Judith L. Schwank (Democratic), Camera Bartolotta (Republican), Killion, Dinniman, Yudichak, Brewster, Michele Brooks (Republican), Kim L. Ward (Republican), Judy Ward (Republican), and Jay Costa (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 85?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 85?
- Track SB 85 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 85
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 85
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →