Relating to urban renewal; and prescribing an effective date.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2174 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2174.
You're tracking HB 2174
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2174 — Relating to urban renewal; and prescribing an effective date.
Last action — Chapter 580, (2019 Laws): Effective date September 29, 2019.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
For urban renewal plan proposed on or after effective date of Act, that includes public building project, requires concurrence of at least three of four taxing districts estimated to forgo most property tax revenue under proposed plan. Requires notice of hearing on proposed urban renewal plan or substantial amendment or change to plan to contain statement that adoption may affect property tax rates for standard rate urban renewal plans or reduced rate plans whose consolidated billing tax rate includes tax pledged to repay exempt bonded indebtedness approved on or before October 6, 2001. <i>Excludes</i>] <b>Clarifies and modifies inclusions in and exclusions</b> from consolidated billing tax rate of urban renewal plans <i>adopted or amended on or after effective date of Act tax pledged to repay exempt bonded indebtedness approved on or after effective date of Act</i>]. Provides that for purposes of 20 percent limit on amount of land added by amendments to total land area of original urban renewal plan, calculation of total land area excludes reductions of land area made after original plan was adopted. Requires urban renewal agency's annual statement to include maximum indebtedness for each urban renewal area included in urban renewal plan of agency, including amount of indebtedness incurred through end of preceding fiscal year. Requires statement to be distributed to each taxing district affected by urban renewal plan of agency. Takes effect on 91st day following adjournment sine die.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB 2174 on the official Oregon source →Action History
-
Chapter 580, (2019 Laws): Effective date September 29, 2019.
-
Governor signed.
-
President signed.
-
Speaker signed.
-
Rules suspended. Third reading. Carried by Taylor. Passed.
-
Second reading.
-
Recommendation: Do pass the B-Eng. bill.
-
Work Session held.
-
Public Hearing and Work Session held.
-
Referred to Finance and Revenue.
-
First reading. Referred to President's desk.
-
Rules suspended. Third reading. Carried by Marsh. Passed.
-
Second reading.
-
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments and be printed B-Engrossed.
-
Work Session held.
-
Work Session cancelled.
-
Public Hearing held.
-
Referred to Revenue by order of Speaker.
-
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments, be printed A-Engrossed, and be referred to Revenue.
-
Work Session held.
-
Public Hearing held.
-
Referred to Economic Development.
-
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 90 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (90)
90 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 90 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 26 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 3% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alan Olsen | — | Nay |
| Arnie Roblan | — | Yea |
| Betsy Johnson | — | Yea |
| Bill Hansell | — | Yea |
| Brian Boquist | — | Not Voting |
| Chuck Riley | — | Yea |
| Chuck Thomsen | — | Yea |
| Cliff Bentz | — | Yea |
| Dallas Heard | — | Yea |
| Dennis Linthicum | — | Not Voting |
| Denyc Boles | — | Yea |
| Elizabeth Steiner Hayward | — | Yea |
| Ginny Burdick | — | Yea |
| Herman Baertschiger Jr. | — | Yea |
| Laurie Monnes Anderson | — | Yea |
| Lee Beyer | — | Yea |
| Mark Hass | — | Yea |
| Michael Dembrow | — | Yea |
| Peter Courtney | — | Yea |
| Sara Gelser | — | Yea |
| Shemia Fagan | — | Yea |
| Tim Knopp | — | Yea |
| Floyd Prozanski | Democrat | Yea |
| James Manning Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Golden | Democrat | Yea |
| Kathleen Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Lew Frederick | Democrat | Yea |
| Rob Wagner | Democrat | Yea |
| Fred Girod | Republican | Not Voting |
| Kim Thatcher | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brian Boquist | — | Yea |
| Chuck Riley | — | Yea |
| Cliff Bentz | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Hass | — | Yea |
| Kathleen Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 2% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Barbara Smith Warner | — | Yea |
| Lynn Findley | — | Yea |
| Nancy Nathanson | Democrat | Yea |
| Pam Marsh | Democrat | Yea |
| Sue Rieke Smith | Democrat | Yea |
| E. Werner Reschke | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brad Witt | — | Yea |
| Caddy McKeown | — | Yea |
| Greg Barreto | — | Yea |
| John Lively | Democrat | Yea |
| Julie Fahey | Democrat | Yea |
| Ken Helm | Democrat | Yea |
| Pam Marsh | Democrat | Yea |
| Susan McLain | Democrat | Yea |
| Christine Drazan | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Bonham | Republican | Yea |
| Kim Wallan | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 2174 do?
- For urban renewal plan proposed on or after effective date of Act, that includes public building project, requires concurrence of at least three of four taxing districts estimated to forgo most property tax revenue under proposed plan. Requires notice of hearing on proposed urban renewal plan or substantial amendment or change to plan to contain statement that adoption may affect property tax rates for standard rate urban renewal plans or reduced rate plans whose consolidated billing tax rate includes tax pledged to repay exempt bonded indebtedness approved on or before October 6, 2001. <i>Excludes</i>] <b>Clarifies and modifies inclusions in and exclusions</b> from consolidated billing tax rate of urban renewal plans <i>adopted or amended on or after effective date of Act tax pledged to repay exempt bonded indebtedness approved on or after effective date of Act</i>]. Provides that for purposes of 20 percent limit on amount of land added by amendments to total land area of original urban renewal plan, calculation of total land area excludes reductions of land area made after original plan was adopted. Requires urban renewal agency's annual statement to include maximum indebtedness for each urban renewal area included in urban renewal plan of agency, including amount of indebtedness incurred through end of preceding fiscal year. Requires statement to be distributed to each taxing district affected by urban renewal plan of agency. Takes effect on 91st day following adjournment sine die.
- What is the current status of HB 2174?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2174?
- Track HB 2174 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2174
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2174
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →