HB 2399 — Relating to crime.
Last action — Chapter 399, (2019 Laws): Effective date January 1, 2020.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2019. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Provides that state appeal from order allowing demurrer must be decided by appellate court within prescribed time limits. Provides that, for purposes of naming defendant in post-conviction relief petition, petitioner released on post-prison supervision shall be deemed to be imprisoned in institution from which petitioner was released. Corrects terminology in statute regulating contact with victims during post-conviction relief proceedings. Sets time limits for filing notice of cross-appeal in post-conviction relief proceeding. Specifies that Attorney General represents defendant on appeal from post-conviction relief judgment. Provides that, for purposes of theft offense, when value of property cannot reasonably be ascertained, value is presumed to be less than $100. Requires financial institution to respond electronically to electronic request from law enforcement agency for information concerning customer account information. <b>Authorizes electronic signatures for search warrant affiants who swear to affidavit by telephone.</b>
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB 2399 on the official Oregon source →Action History
-
Chapter 399, (2019 Laws): Effective date January 1, 2020.
-
Governor signed.
-
President signed.
-
Speaker signed.
-
House concurred in Senate amendments and repassed bill.
-
Third reading. Carried by Bentz. Passed.
-
Second reading.
-
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments to the A-Eng. bill. (Printed B-Eng.)
-
Work Session held.
-
Public Hearing held.
-
Referred to Judiciary.
-
First reading. Referred to President's desk.
-
Third reading. Carried by Barker. Passed.
-
Rules suspended. Carried over to April 23, 2019 Calendar.
-
Second reading.
-
Recommendation: Do pass with amendments and be printed A-Engrossed.
-
Work Session held.
-
Public Hearing held.
-
Referred to Judiciary.
-
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 90 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (90)
90 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 90 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 28 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alan Olsen | — | Not Voting |
| Arnie Roblan | — | Yea |
| Betsy Johnson | — | Yea |
| Bill Hansell | — | Yea |
| Brian Boquist | — | Yea |
| Chuck Riley | — | Yea |
| Chuck Thomsen | — | Yea |
| Cliff Bentz | — | Yea |
| Dallas Heard | — | Yea |
| Dennis Linthicum | — | Yea |
| Elizabeth Steiner Hayward | — | Yea |
| Ginny Burdick | — | Yea |
| Herman Baertschiger Jr. | — | Yea |
| Jackie Winters | — | Not Voting |
| Laurie Monnes Anderson | — | Yea |
| Lee Beyer | — | Yea |
| Mark Hass | — | Yea |
| Michael Dembrow | — | Yea |
| Peter Courtney | — | Yea |
| Sara Gelser | — | Yea |
| Shemia Fagan | — | Yea |
| Tim Knopp | — | Yea |
| Floyd Prozanski | Democrat | Yea |
| James Manning Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Golden | Democrat | Yea |
| Kathleen Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Lew Frederick | Democrat | Yea |
| Rob Wagner | Democrat | Yea |
| Fred Girod | Republican | Yea |
| Kim Thatcher | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cliff Bentz | — | Yea |
| Dennis Linthicum | — | Yea |
| Sara Gelser | — | Yea |
| Shemia Fagan | — | Yea |
| Floyd Prozanski | Democrat | Yea |
| James Manning Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Kim Thatcher | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carla Piluso | — | Yea |
| Duane Stark | — | Yea |
| Janelle Bynum | — | Yea |
| Jeff Barker | — | Yea |
| Jennifer Williamson | — | Yea |
| Karin Power | — | Yea |
| Mitch Greenlick | — | Yea |
| Sherrie Sprenger | — | Yea |
| Chris Gorsek | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike McLane | Republican | Yea |
| Rick Lewis | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 2399 do?
- Provides that state appeal from order allowing demurrer must be decided by appellate court within prescribed time limits. Provides that, for purposes of naming defendant in post-conviction relief petition, petitioner released on post-prison supervision shall be deemed to be imprisoned in institution from which petitioner was released. Corrects terminology in statute regulating contact with victims during post-conviction relief proceedings. Sets time limits for filing notice of cross-appeal in post-conviction relief proceeding. Specifies that Attorney General represents defendant on appeal from post-conviction relief judgment. Provides that, for purposes of theft offense, when value of property cannot reasonably be ascertained, value is presumed to be less than $100. Requires financial institution to respond electronically to electronic request from law enforcement agency for information concerning customer account information. <b>Authorizes electronic signatures for search warrant affiants who swear to affidavit by telephone.</b>
- What is the current status of HB 2399?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2399?
- Track HB 2399 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2399
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2399
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →