Oregon 2017 Regular Session Status: Passed House 4 D cosponsors

HB 2567 — Relating to a requirement that certain employers provide notice before a reduction in workforce.

Last action — In committee upon adjournment.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Requires employers with 100 or more employees to provide 60 days' notice to employees and certain officials before ceasing operations, relocating or ordering mass layoff involving 50 or more employees. Creates exceptions. Requires employer attempting to invoke exception involving active pursuit of capital or business to provide, under penalty of perjury, written documentation of efforts to court or Commissioner of Bureau of Labor and Industries. Requires commissioner to adopt rules related to requirements. Provides that employer is liable for back pay to employee and other relief.

Bill Text

We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.

Read HB 2567 on the official Oregon source →

Action History

  1. In committee upon adjournment.

  2. Public Hearing held.

  3. Referred to Workforce.

  4. First reading. Referred to President's desk.

  5. Vote explanation(s) filed by Smith DB.

  6. Third reading. Carried by Witt. Passed.

  7. Rules suspended. Carried over to April 24, 2017 Calendar.

  8. Second reading.

  9. Recommendation: Do pass with amendments and be printed A-Engrossed.

  10. Work Session held.

  11. Work Session held.

  12. Public Hearing held.

  13. Referred to Business and Labor.

  14. First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 6 co-sponsors · 83 not signed on · 22 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (6)

Not signed on (83)

83 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 83 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Third reading. Carried by Witt. Passed.

Passed 33 Yea · 23 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211802
Republican 0500
Democrat 12002
Total 332304
% of votes cast 55%38%0%7%
How each member voted (60)
Member Party Vote
John Huffman — Nay
A. Richard Vial — Nay
Alissa Keny-Guyer — Yea
Andy Olson — Nay
Ann Lininger — Yea
Barbara Smith Warner — Yea
Bill Kennemer — Nay
Bill Post — Nay
Brad Witt — Yea
Brian Clem — Yea
Caddy McKeown — Yea
Carl Wilson — Nay
Carla Piluso — Yea
Cliff Bentz — Nay
Dallas Heard — Nay
Dan Rayfield — Yea
Deborah Boone — Not Voting
Diego Hernandez — Yea
Duane Stark — Nay
Gene Whisnant — Nay
Greg Barreto — Nay
Janelle Bynum — Yea
Jeff Barker — Yea
Jeff Reardon — Yea
Jennifer Williamson — Yea
Jodi Hack — Nay
Julie Parrish — Yea
Karin Power — Yea
Knute Buehler — Nay
Margaret Doherty — Yea
Mark Johnson — Nay
Mike Nearman — Nay
Mitch Greenlick — Yea
Paul Holvey — Yea
Phil Barnhart — Yea
Ron Noble — Nay
Sal Esquivel — Nay
Sheri Malstrom — Yea
Sherrie Sprenger — Nay
Teresa Alonso Leon — Not Voting
Tina Kotek — Yea
Chris Gorsek Democrat Not Voting
David Gomberg Democrat Yea
Janeen Sollman Democrat Yea
John Lively Democrat Yea
Julie Fahey Democrat Yea
Ken Helm Democrat Yea
Mark Meek Democrat Yea
Nancy Nathanson Democrat Yea
Pam Marsh Democrat Yea
Paul Evans Democrat Yea
Rob Nosse Democrat Yea
Sue Rieke Smith Democrat Not Voting
Susan McLain Democrat Yea
Tawna Sanchez Democrat Yea
Cedric Hayden Republican Nay
David Brock Smith Republican Nay
E. Werner Reschke Republican Nay
Mike McLane Republican Nay
Rick Lewis Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 2567 do?
Requires employers with 100 or more employees to provide 60 days' notice to employees and certain officials before ceasing operations, relocating or ordering mass layoff involving 50 or more employees. Creates exceptions. Requires employer attempting to invoke exception involving active pursuit of capital or business to provide, under penalty of perjury, written documentation of efforts to court or Commissioner of Bureau of Labor and Industries. Requires commissioner to adopt rules related to requirements. Provides that employer is liable for back pay to employee and other relief.
Who sponsors HB 2567?
HB 2567 is sponsored by Janeen Sollman (Democrat), Rob Nosse (Democrat), Chris Gorsek (Democrat), Mark Meek (Democrat), Jennifer Williamson, Teresa Alonso Leon, and Brad Witt.
What is the current status of HB 2567?
This bill died with 2017 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 2567?
Track HB 2567 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 2567

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 2567

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →