Relating to criminal appeals.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 896 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 896.
You're tracking SB 896
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 896 — Relating to criminal appeals.
Last action — Chapter 529, 2017 Laws.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 28, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Defines terms related to appeals. Separates provisions relating to appealability from provisions relating to reviewability. Lists specific judgments and orders that defendant and state may appeal, including trial court denial of restitution or award of restitution in amount less than that requested by state. Requires nonjurisdictional showing of colorable claim of error in defendant's notice on appeal from certain trial court decisions. Reorganizes provisions concerning appellate procedures. Revises provisions concerning service of notice of appeal on opposing party and filing of notice. Expands appellate court authority to review sentences in misdemeanor cases. Expressly provides for appellate court authority to review trial court's decision to merge or not to merge determinations of guilt. Describes intermediate decisions of trial court that appellate court has authority to review. Reorganizes provisions concerning trial court authority to enter corrected judgment or supplemental judgment awarding restitution during pendency of appeal. Describes scope of appellate court authority to review corrected or amended judgments. Reorganizes and revises provisions describing dispositional authority of appellate court.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SB 896 on the official Oregon source →Action History
-
Chapter 529, 2017 Laws.
-
Effective date, January 1, 2018.
-
Governor signed.
-
Speaker signed.
-
President signed.
-
Third reading. Carried by Barker. Passed.
-
Rules suspended. Carried over to June 21, 2017 Calendar.
-
Second reading.
-
Recommendation: Do pass.
-
Referred to Ways and Means.
-
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
-
Third reading. Carried by Prozanski. Passed.
-
Second reading.
-
Recommendation: Do pass.
-
Work Session held.
-
Public Hearing and Work Session held.
-
Returned to Full Committee.
-
Assigned to Subcommittee On Public Safety.
-
Referred to Ways and Means by order of the President.
-
Recommendation: Do pass.
-
Work Session held.
-
Public Hearing held.
-
Referred to Judiciary.
-
Introduction and first reading. Referred to President's desk.
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 90 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (90)
90 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 90 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 58 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alan DeBoer | — | Yea |
| Alan Olsen | — | Yea |
| Arnie Roblan | — | Yea |
| Betsy Johnson | — | Yea |
| Bill Hansell | — | Yea |
| Brian Boquist | — | Yea |
| Chuck Riley | — | Yea |
| Chuck Thomsen | — | Yea |
| Dennis Linthicum | — | Yea |
| Elizabeth Steiner Hayward | — | Yea |
| Ginny Burdick | — | Yea |
| Herman Baertschiger Jr. | — | Yea |
| Jackie Winters | — | Yea |
| Jeff Kruse | — | Yea |
| Laurie Monnes Anderson | — | Yea |
| Lee Beyer | — | Yea |
| Mark Hass | — | Yea |
| Michael Dembrow | — | Yea |
| Peter Courtney | — | Yea |
| Richard Devlin | — | Yea |
| Rod Monroe | — | Yea |
| Sara Gelser | — | Yea |
| Ted Ferrioli | — | Yea |
| Tim Knopp | — | Yea |
| Floyd Prozanski | Democrat | Yea |
| James Manning Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Kathleen Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Lew Frederick | Democrat | Yea |
| Fred Girod | Republican | Yea |
| Kim Thatcher | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 46 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (46)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dennis Linthicum | — | Yea |
| Michael Dembrow | — | Yea |
| Floyd Prozanski | Democrat | Yea |
| James Manning Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Kim Thatcher | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 896 do?
- Defines terms related to appeals. Separates provisions relating to appealability from provisions relating to reviewability. Lists specific judgments and orders that defendant and state may appeal, including trial court denial of restitution or award of restitution in amount less than that requested by state. Requires nonjurisdictional showing of colorable claim of error in defendant's notice on appeal from certain trial court decisions. Reorganizes provisions concerning appellate procedures. Revises provisions concerning service of notice of appeal on opposing party and filing of notice. Expands appellate court authority to review sentences in misdemeanor cases. Expressly provides for appellate court authority to review trial court's decision to merge or not to merge determinations of guilt. Describes intermediate decisions of trial court that appellate court has authority to review. Reorganizes provisions concerning trial court authority to enter corrected judgment or supplemental judgment awarding restitution during pendency of appeal. Describes scope of appellate court authority to review corrected or amended judgments. Reorganizes and revises provisions describing dispositional authority of appellate court.
- What is the current status of SB 896?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 28, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 896?
- Track SB 896 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 896
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 896
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →