SB 86 — Relating to fingerprinting required by agencies that request human resource services.
Last action — Effective date, January 1, 2018.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2017. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 4 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Authorizes Oregon Department of Administrative Services to require fingerprints of certain persons who are employed by or applying for employment with qualified entity or who provide services or seek to provide services to qualified entity. Defines "qualified entity."
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SB 86 on the official Oregon source →Action History
-
Effective date, January 1, 2018.
-
Chapter 560, 2017 Laws.
-
Governor signed.
-
Speaker signed.
-
President signed.
-
Third reading. Carried by Kennemer. Passed.
-
Rules suspended. Carried over to June 26, 2017 Calendar.
-
Second reading.
-
Recommendation: Do pass.
-
Work Session held.
-
Public Hearing held.
-
Referred to Rules.
-
First reading. Referred to Speaker's desk.
-
Third reading. Carried by Prozanski. Passed.
-
Second reading.
-
Recommendation: Do pass.
-
Work Session held.
-
Public Hearing held.
-
Referred to General Government and Accountability.
-
Introduction and first reading. Referred to President's desk.
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 90 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (90)
90 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 90 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democrat | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (60)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Barbara Smith Warner | — | Yea |
| Bill Kennemer | — | Yea |
| Dan Rayfield | — | Yea |
| Greg Barreto | — | Yea |
| Jennifer Williamson | — | Yea |
| Jodi Hack | — | Yea |
| Paul Holvey | — | Yea |
| Rob Nosse | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike McLane | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 26 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 87% | 3% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (30)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alan DeBoer | — | Not Voting |
| Alan Olsen | — | Yea |
| Arnie Roblan | — | Yea |
| Betsy Johnson | — | Yea |
| Bill Hansell | — | Yea |
| Brian Boquist | — | Nay |
| Chuck Riley | — | Yea |
| Chuck Thomsen | — | Yea |
| Dennis Linthicum | — | Yea |
| Elizabeth Steiner Hayward | — | Yea |
| Ginny Burdick | — | Yea |
| Herman Baertschiger Jr. | — | Yea |
| Jackie Winters | — | Yea |
| Jeff Kruse | — | Yea |
| Laurie Monnes Anderson | — | Yea |
| Lee Beyer | — | Yea |
| Mark Hass | — | Yea |
| Michael Dembrow | — | Yea |
| Peter Courtney | — | Yea |
| Richard Devlin | — | Yea |
| Rod Monroe | — | Yea |
| Sara Gelser | — | Yea |
| Ted Ferrioli | — | Yea |
| Tim Knopp | — | Yea |
| Floyd Prozanski | Democrat | Yea |
| James Manning Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Kathleen Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Lew Frederick | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Fred Girod | Republican | Yea |
| Kim Thatcher | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alan DeBoer | — | Yea |
| Chuck Riley | — | Yea |
| Mark Hass | — | Yea |
| Floyd Prozanski | Democrat | Yea |
| Kim Thatcher | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 86 do?
- Authorizes Oregon Department of Administrative Services to require fingerprints of certain persons who are employed by or applying for employment with qualified entity or who provide services or seek to provide services to qualified entity. Defines "qualified entity."
- What is the current status of SB 86?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2017. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 86?
- Track SB 86 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 86
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 86
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →