RACIAL IMPACT OF CERTAIN LEGISLATION
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 81 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 81.
You're tracking SB 81
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 81 — RACIAL IMPACT OF CERTAIN LEGISLATION
Last action — DO PASS, as amended, committee report adopted
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
163 added · 142 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Senate Bill 81 adds clarity regarding purposes for which the New Mexico Sentencing Commission must evaluate proposed legislation related to crime. This change highlights the importance of assessing the racial impact of new laws before they are enacted. By doing so, the amendment aims to ensure a more equitable justice system and to help prevent unintended discriminatory outcomes in sentencing.
SENATE BILL 81 55TH LEGISLATURE -STATEOFNEWMEXICO-- STATEOFNEWMEXICO- FIRST SESSION, 2021 INTRODUCED BY Bill B.
O'Neill and Sheryl Williams Stapleton 6This 8document 10may ANincorporate ACTamendments RELATINGproposed TOby CRIME;a committee, but not yet adopted, as well as amendments that have been adopted during the current legislative session.
REQUIRINGThe THEdocument NEWis MEXICOa SENTENCINGtool COMMISSIONto TOshow EVALUATEamendments THEin RACIALAN IMPACTACT OFRELATING CERTAINTO PROPOSEDCRIME; LEGISLATION.
15REQUIRING BETHE ITNEW ENACTEDMEXICO BYSENTENCING THEh LEGISLATURECOMMISSION OFTO EVALUATE THE STATERACIAL IMPACT OF NEWCERTAIN MEXICO:PROPOSED g o LEGISLATION.
SECTIONt 1.hr g e i k h r i s BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
Sectionh 9-3-10.3, NMSAt, 1978SECTION (being1. Laws 2019, e t 17 Chapter 211, Section 16) is amended to read:
wSection 9-3-10.3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2019, e u g e b l ne de 18h "9-3-10.3.Chapter 211, Section 16) is amended to read:
LEGISLATIONn TOd INCREASE,d DECREASEi OR CREATE = = 19o ah l"9-3-10.3. PERIODS OF IMPRISONMENT--FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENTS--PROCEDURE.-- i a e r 20 A.
TheLEGISLATION NewTO MexicoINCREASE, sentencingDECREASE commissionOR shallCREATE al t] mb m,d 21i prepare a fiscalº impacte statementPERIODS asOF providedIMPRISONMENT--FISCAL inIMPACT thisSTATEMENTS--PROCEDURE.-- sectionr di = r t e 22w ford m a billn that:o A.
cThe eNew sMexico ksentencing 23commission (1)shall createsd am new: crime or repeals an existing e a n b 24 crime for which imprisonment is authorized;
b e d s º o t n = .218226.3AIC February 2, 2021 (11:57am) s k m e e a n e d r e l u [ (2)A increasesd orprepare decreasesa thefiscal periodimpact ofstatement .218226.3as imprisonmentprovided authorizedin this section for ana existingbill crime;that:
(1) creates a new crime or repeals an existing crime for which imprisonment is authorized;
(2) increases or decreases the period of imprisonment authorized for an existing crime;
The estimated change in annual operating costs shall reflect the largest annual change from the projected change for the six h fiscal years following the effective date of the law and shall g o t hr be calculated in current dollars.
The fiscal impact statement g e i k shall include details concerning any:
h r i s (1) increase or decrease in the inmate h , t, population;
and e tu 17g e b l e e h (2) racial impact of the proposed legislation, w l n d 18d i = = o h including:
=l =] 19b ,d i a lº e (a) information regarding any unique or r i a= r t e rw 20d m a n o disproportionate impact on any race, gender orSJCºidentity»SJC sexuald a t m m: 21 orientation of persons in the state;
b e d rs eº 22o (b)t statisticaln analysis= of.218226.3AIC theFebruary c2, e2021 (11:57am) s k 23m projectede impact- of2 the- proposede legislationa onn anye race,d r e al nu b[ 24A genderd or sexual orientation of persons in the state;
u(b) [statistical (c)analysis any unintended consequences of the .218226.3projected -impact 2of -the proposed legislation thaton would impact any race, gender SJCºidentity»SJC or sexual orientation of persons in the state;
(d)(c) theany impactunintended consequences of the proposed legislation onthat correctionalwould facilitiesimpact and services for any race, gender SJCºidentity»SJC or sexual orientation of persons in the state;
(e)(d) the impact of the proposed legislation on recidivismcorrectional ratesfacilities SJCº;»SJC SJCºand»SJC SJCº(e) the impact of the proposed legislation on»SJC services for any race, gender SJCºidentity»SJC or sexual orientation of persons in the state;
andSJCº(e)»SJC (f)SJCº(f)»SJC informationthe regardingimpact anyon uniqueh orrecidivism disproportionaterates impactfor andany statisticalrace, analysisgender ofSJCºidentity»SJC theor projectedu impact» ofr thesexual proposedorientation legislationof onpersons each judicial district in the state.state;
C.and t h g e l i SJCº(f)»SJC SJCº(g)»SJC information h r i s regarding any unique or disproportionate impact and statistical h , e h analysis of the projected impact of the proposed legislation on t u g e b l e e , gh each judicial district in the state.
Ifn thed Newd Mexicoi sentencing= commission= doeso noth haveC. sufficient information to project the fiscal impact, the fiscal impact statement shall state that there is insufficient information to estimate the fiscal impact.
If the New Mexico sentencing commission does not l ] b ,d i a º r have sufficient information to project the fiscal impact, the e r = t 17e D.w d m a n o fiscal impact statement shall state that there is insufficient d m :
Theb correctionsr departmente shallt annuallyº wo lt n = .218226.3AIC February 2, 2021 (11:57am) s k m e - 3 - e a n e d 18r providee thel Newu Mexico[ sentencingA commissiond with:information to estimate the fiscal impact.
=D. = 19 a l (1) the average operating costs per inmate and i a e r 20 the number of inmates in adult correctional facilities;
andThe acorrections tdepartment mshall mannually 21provide (2)the admissionsNew andMexico releasesentencing datacommission forwith: all d r e 22 inmates in adult correctional facilities.
c(1) ethe saverage koperating 23costs E.per inmate and the number of inmates in adult correctional facilities;
Theand judiciary(2) shalladmissions annuallyand providerelease the New e a n b 24 Mexico sentencing commission with requested data necessaryfor toall uinmates [in prepareadult fiscalcorrectional impactfacilities. statements.
.218226.3E. - 3 - F.
AsThe usedjudiciary inshall thisannually section,provide "operatingthe costs"New meansMexico allsentencing costscommission otherwith thanrequested capitaldata outlaynecessary coststo forprepare state-operatedfiscal adultimpact correctionalstatements. facilities and privately operated adult correctional facilities." - 4 - 7 9 11 13 15 e t 17 w l n d 18 = = 19 a l i a e r 20 a t m m 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .218226.3
F.
As used in this section, "operating costs" means all costs other than capital outlay costs for state-operated adult correctional facilities and privately operated adult correctional facilities." - 4 - h u » r t h g e l i h r i s h , e h t u g e b l e e , gh n d d i = = o h l ] b ,d i a º r e r = t e w d m a n o d m :
b r e t º o t n = .218226.3AIC February 2, 2021 (11:57am) s k m e e a n e d r e l u [ A d
View plain text versions (2)
- Amended Amendments in Context Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
DO PASS, as amended, committee report adopted
-
Sent to Senate Judiciary Committee & Senate Finance Committee
Sponsors
- Bill B. O'Neill · Primary
- Sheryl Williams Stapleton · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- O'Neill, Bill B.
- Stapleton, Sheryl Williams
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (110)
110 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 110 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 81?
- SB 81 is sponsored by O'Neill, Bill B. and Stapleton, Sheryl Williams.
- What is the current status of SB 81?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 81?
- Track SB 81 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 81
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 81
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →