ENERGY OPERATION BONDING AMOUNTS
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HM 29 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HM 29.
You're tracking HM 29
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HM 29 — ENERGY OPERATION BONDING AMOUNTS
Last action — action postponed indefinitely
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
158 added · 119 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill HM 29 emphasizes the importance of establishing adequate bonding amounts for energy operations, particularly regarding activities related to oil and gas extraction. It clarifies the roles of various governmental departments regulating these industries and reinforces the responsibility of operators to reclaim and remediate lands they impact. This change matters because it aims to enhance environmental protections and ensure that financial resources are available to address potential damages caused by energy operations, ultimately promoting greater accountability within the industry.
HOUSE ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE MEMORIAL 29 54TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - SECOND SESSION , 2020 INTRODUCED4 BY Matthew McQueen 6 8 10 A MEMORIAL REQUESTING A REVIEW OF STATEWIDE REMEDIATION AND RECLAMATION BONDS AND EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR ESTABLISHING SUFFICIENT BONDING AMOUNTS FOR ENERGY OPERATIONS.
1514 WHEREAS, New Mexico is one of North America's leading energy producers;
and e t 17 WHEREAS, multiple state agencies are tasked with ensuring w l n d 18 adequate bonding protection for energy-energy-related and extraction-relatedoil-and-gas- = = 19 aextraction-related l activities on public and private lands;
and i a el ri 20a WHEREAS, the commissioner of public lands, as the chief e r 20 a t m m 21 executive of the state land office, has a constitutional and d r e 22 statutory duty to manage and care for approximately nine c e s k 23 million acres of surface land and thirteen million acres of e a n b 24 mineral estate throughout New Mexico;
and u [ WHEREAS, the oil conservation division of the energy, .217374.2 HENRC/HM 29 minerals and natural resources .216793.2 department regulates mining, oil and gas activities and produced water disposaldisposal, and the department manages clean energy programs;
and WHEREAS, the department of environment'senvironment missionregulates isenergy- torelated protectactivities andnot restoreexclusively regulated under the environmentOil forand futureGas generations;Act;
and WHEREAS, persons engaged in energy-energy-related and extraction-relatedoil-and- gas-extraction-related activities can be required by law and contract to reclaim lands disturbed by those activities and to remediate surface and subsurface contamination caused by those activities;
and WHEREAS, requiring that persons engaged in energy-energy-related e e 17 and extraction-relatedoil-and-gas-extraction-related activities provide e e n d 18 regulators and land management agencies with bonds or personal = = l ] 19 financial security can be an effective way to ensure that the personsa engagedl inr ei e20 17persons engaged in those activities perform their obligations t e a t to reclaim the land e e n d 18 and remediate surface and subsurface m m 21 e d contamination;
and =r =e l22 ]c 19e r c 23 WHEREAS, bonds help prevent or reduce taxpayer losses;
and e a ln rb i24 20 WHEREAS, bonds should be set at amounts that provide tu e[ a t sufficient financial assurance to prevent remediation and m.217374.2 m- 212 e- dHENRC/HM r29 e 22 compliance costs, such as the costs of remediating sites and c e r c 23 removing infrastructure, from falling on taxpayers or state e a n b 24 land trust beneficiaries;
and u [ WHEREAS, there are approximately fifty-seven thousand four .216793.2 - 2 - hundred one active oil and gas wells and sixty-four thousand eight hundred fifty-eight inactive wells statewide, of which seven hundred eleven wells are orphaned wells and fourteen thousand sixty active and seventeen thousand six hundred eighty-six inactive oil and gas wells are on state trust lands;
and WHEREAS, the current state land office bonding e e 17 requirements require a maximum bond of twenty-five thousand e e n d 18 dollars ($25,000), which covers an unlimited number of oil and = = l ] 19 gas and mineral leases, as well as rights of way, recycling a l r i 20 facilities and all other types of leases issued on state land et e 17a t statewide to a single lessee;
and em em n21 e d 18 WHEREAS, bond requirements of the oil conservation =r =e l22 ]c 19e r c 23 division of the energy, minerals and natural resources e a ln rb i24 20 department are generally limited to plugging and abandonment tu e[ a t costs, in an amount that varies depending on the number of m.217374.2 m- 213 e- dHENRC/HM r29 e 22 wells per operator, with the maximum amount set at two hundred c e r c 23 fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) for over one hundred wells;
e a n b 24 and u [ WHEREAS, the existing exposure for plugging inactive well .216793.2 - 3 - sites on state lands alone is over five million dollars ($5,000,000), and the cost of remediating these sites would cost additional unknown millions of dollars;
and WHEREAS, the existing exposure for decommissioning pipelines and remediating rights of way on state lands alone is hundreds of millions of dollars, and the cost of remediating these rights of way if, for example, leaks and spills occur, would cost additional unknown millions of dollars;
and WHEREAS, in a September 2019 report, the United States e e 17 government accountability office reviewed whether bonding e e n d 18 inadequacies exist and found that oil and gas bond amounts set = = l ] 19 by the bureau of land management of the United States a l r i 20 department of the interior largely have not been updated in et e 17a t forty years or more and fail to serve their intended purpose em em n21 e d 18 and recommended that bond minimums be raised to more closely =r =e l22 ]c 19e r c 23 reflect actual remediation and reclamation costs;
and e a ln rb i24 20 WHEREAS, the bureau of land management concurred with the tu e[ a t report's findings to routinely review oil and gas bonds and set m.217374.2 m- 214 e- dHENRC/HM r29 e 22 amounts that appropriately reflect the risks and liabilities c e r c 23 posed by lessees and operators to protect taxpayers;
and e a n b 24 WHEREAS, the minimum bond amounts utilized by the bureau u [ of land management and found to be insufficient are in many .216793.2 - 4 - cases the same rates applicable to state land office and oil conservation division bond thresholds;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that support be expressed for establishing bonding amounts that are sufficient to cover reasonably anticipated remediation and reclamation costs and lease obligations;obligations for energy-related and oil-and-gas- extraction-related activities;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the state land office, in consultation with the oil conservation division of the energy, minerals and natural resources department and the department of environmentenvironment, be requested to conduct a bond adequacy review e e 17 related to energy production and infrastructure;
and e e n d 18 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the agencies be requested to = = l ] 19 evaluate how to collectively ensure adequate bondingbonding, toa fulfilll theirr respectivei statutory20 obligationsappropriate use of funds from forfeited bonds and adequate t e a t funding and appropriate use of statutorily dedicated m m 21 e d reclamation funds to avoid having excess expenses fall on r e 22 c e r c 23 taxpayers or state land trust beneficiaries e e 17 and to report theire a n b 24 findings to the appropriate legislative e e n d 18 interim committee by u [ December 1, 2020;
and =.217374.2 =- l5 ]- 19HENRC/HM 29 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be a l r i 20 transmitted to the commissioner of public lands, or the secretarycommissioner's tdesignee, eform aand tchair ofan environment,advisory thegroup secretaryto ofmeet, energy,share mineralsinformation and naturalevaluate mexisting mrequirements 21for eand dlimits ron ebonding 22and resourcesto andassess the directorneed offor thechanges legislativeto financelaws, crules eand rpolicies cto 23achieve committee.the objectives of this memorial;
eand aBE nIT bFURTHER 24RESOLVED -that 5the -advisory ugroup [be .216793.2composed of representatives from the following groups:
A.
the state land office;
B.
the oil and conservation division of the energy, minerals and natural resources department;
C.
the department of environment;
and D.
affected stakeholders, including representatives of large and small oil and gas producers, midstream operators, other energy project operators, environmental and conservation advocacy organizations and interested members of the public;
e e 17 and e e n d 18 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be = = l ] 19 transmitted to the commissioner of public lands, the secretary a l r i 20 of environment, the secretary of energy, minerals and natural t e a t resources and the director of the legislative finance m m 21 e d committee.
r e 22 c e r c 23 - 6 - e a n b 24 u [ .217374.2
View plain text versions (2)
- Substitute EN substitute Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
action postponed indefinitely
-
DO NOT PASS, replaced with committee substitute
-
Sent to House Energy, Environment and Natural Resources Committee
Sponsors
- Matthew McQueen · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Matthew McQueen Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HM 29?
- HM 29 is sponsored by Matthew McQueen (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HM 29?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HM 29?
- Track HM 29 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HM 29
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HM 29
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →