New Mexico 2020 Regular Session Status: Enacted 2 D cosponsors

SB 64 — PUBLIC RECORDS PERTAINING TO CERTAIN CLAIMS

Last action — Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 31, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Advancing 58% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

53 added · 112 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to Bill SB 64 remove a previously established 180-day waiting period for releasing public records related to claims against government entities, public officers, or public employees. This change will make it easier for the public to access information about these claims more promptly. Additionally, the amendments eliminate criminal penalties for individuals who disclose confidential records related to these claims. This transparency is intended to enhance accountability within government operations.

→
Previous
Latest
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL 64 54 TH LEGISLATURE- STATE OF NEW MEXICO - SECOND SESSION , 2020 4 6 8 10 AN ACT RELATING TO RISK MANAGEMENT;
AN ACT RELATING TO RISK MANAGEMENT;
CHANGING AND REMOVING THE EVENTS THAT TRIGGER RELEASE OF PUBLIC RECORDS PERTAINING TO CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES, e t 17 PUBLIC OFFICERS OR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES;
CHANGING AND REMOVING THE EVENTS THAT TRIGGER RELEASE OF PUBLIC RECORDS PERTAINING TO CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES, PUBLIC OFFICERS OR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES;
ELIMINATING CRIMINAL w l n d 18 PENALTIES FOR REVEALING CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS PERTAINING TO = = 19 CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES, PUBLIC OFFICERS a l i a e r 20 OR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES.
ELIMINATING CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR REVEALING CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS PERTAINING TO CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES, PUBLIC OFFICERS OR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES.
a t m m 21 d r e 22 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
c e s k 23 SECTION 1.
SECTION 1.
Section 15-7-9 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1981, e a n b 24 Chapter 280, Section 1) is amended to read:
Section 15-7-9 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1981, Chapter 280, Section 1) is amended to read:
u [ "15-7-9.
"15-7-9.
CONFIDENTIALITY OF RECORDS [PENALTY ].-- .217238.1 SJC/SB 64 A.
CONFIDENTIALITY OF RECORDS.-- A.
The following records created or maintained by the risk management division of the general services department are confidential and shall not be subject to any right of inspection by any person [not a state officer, member of the legislature] except the New Mexico legislative council or a state employee within the scope of [his] the New Mexico legislative council's or state employee's official duties:
The following records created or maintained by the risk management division of the general services department are confidential and shall not be subject to any right of inspection by any person except the New Mexico legislative council or a state employee within the scope of the New Mexico legislative council's or state employee's official duties:
provided that any record of a particular coverage shall be available to any public officer, public employee or governmental entity insured under such coverage;
provided that any record of a particular coverage SJC/SB 64 Page 1 shall be available to any public officer, public employee or governmental entity insured under such coverage;
provided [such records shall be subject to public inspection by New Mexico citizens one hundred eighty days after the latest of the following dates:
provided that the records shall be subject to public inspection on and after the earliest of:
e e 17 (a) the date all statutes of limitation e e n d 18 applicable to the claim have run] that the records shall be = = l ] 19 subject to public inspection on and after the earliest of:
(a) the date a final judgment is issued resolving the claim and all appeals and rights to appeal have been exhausted;
a l r i 20 [(b)] (a) the date [all litigation t e a t involving the claim and the occurrence giving rise thereto has m m 21 e d been brought to] a final judgment is issued resolving the claim r e 22 c e r c 23 and all appeals and rights to appeal have been exhausted;
or (b) the date a settlement agreement is signed by all of the parties.
or e a n b 24 [(c) the date the claim is fully and u [ finally settled;
or .217238.1 - 2 - SJC/SB 64 (d) the date the claim has been placed on closed status] (b) the date a settlement agreement is signed by all of the parties.
Any person performing such audit or providing such defense shall keep such records confidential, except as required otherwise by law.
Any person performing such audit or providing such defense shall keep such records confidential, except as required otherwise by law." SJC/SB 64 Page 2 25
[C.
Any person who reveals records protected pursuant to Subsection A of this section to another person in violation of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall, upon conviction, be fined not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
The state shall not employ any person so convicted for a period of five years after the date of conviction.]" - 3 - e e 17 e e n d 18 = = l ] 19 a l r i 20 t e a t m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .217238.1
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed House

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. Sent to House State Government, Elections & Indian Affairs Committee

  5. passed Senate

  6. DO NOT PASS, replaced with committee substitute

  7. DO PASS committee report adopted

  8. germane

  9. Sent to Senate Committees' Committee & Senate Public Affairs Committee & Senate Judiciary Committee

  10. Sent to Senate Pre-file

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 108 not signed on

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (108)

108 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 108 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 64?
SB 64 is sponsored by Chandler, Christine, Rue, Sander, Linda M. Trujillo (Democrat), and Joseph Cervantes (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 64?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 31, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 64?
Track SB 64 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 64

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 64

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →