New Mexico 2019 Regular Session Status: In Committee

SJM 11 — CABINET REDUCTION TASK FORCE

Last action — action postponed indefinitely

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

71 added · 71 removed

Plain-language change summary

The bill has changed the focus from convening a task force to assigning an interim committee for studying the consolidation of cabinet departments. This update suggests a more formal approach to the process, which may lead to a thorough examination of past recommendations and potential new ones for improving government efficiency. By creating an interim committee, lawmakers aim to ensure a structured and comprehensive review, which is important for making informed decisions about reducing government expenditures and streamlining operations.

→
Previous
Latest
SENATE JOINT MEMORIAL 11 54TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2019 INTRODUCED BY Bill Tallman 6 8 10 A JOINT MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE NEW MEXICO LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL TO CONVENE A TASK FORCE TO STUDY PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE REDUCTION IN CABINET DEPARTMENTS AND TO MAKE FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS.
SENATE RULES COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE JOINT MEMORIAL 11 54TH LEGISLATURE- STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSIO, 2019 4 6 8 10 A JOINT MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE NEW MEXICO LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL TO ASSIGN AN INTERIM COMMITTEE TO STUDY PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE REDUCTION IN CABINET DEPARTMENTS AND TO MAKE FURTHER RECOMMENDATIONS.
15 WHEREAS, in December 2009, Governor Bill Richardson appointed a committee on government efficiency and requested e t 17 recommendations on efficiency measures that could be taken in w l n d 18 the 2010 legislative session to reduce governmental = = 19 a l expenditures by at least fifty million dollars ($50,000,000);
16 WHEREAS, in December 2009, Governor Bill Richardson e t 17 appointed a committee on government efficiency and requested w l n d 18 recommendations on efficiency measures that could be taken in = = 19 the 2010 legislative session to reduce governmental a l i a e r 20 expenditures by at least fifty million dollars ($50,000,000);
i a e r 20 and a t m m 21 WHEREAS, the committee on government efficiency used the d r e 22 following criteria for evaluating cost-saving opportunities:
a t m m 21 and d r e 22 WHEREAS, the committee on government efficiency used the c e s k 23 following criteria for evaluating cost-saving opportunities:
c e s k 23 the amount of money to be saved if adopted, ease and timing of e a n b 24 implementation, mandatory obligations, economic impact of u [ implementing change, span of control and agency size and better .212370.1 alignment with corresponding or related federal agencies;
e a n b 24 the amount of money to be saved if adopted, ease and timing of u [ implementation, mandatory obligations, economic impact of .214441.2 SRC/SJM 11 implementing change, span of control and agency size and better alignment with corresponding or related federal agencies;
and 6 WHEREAS, during the 2010 regular legislative session, House Bill 237 was passed, creating a government restructuring task force to further explore the findings from the 2009 committee on government efficiency;
and WHEREAS, during the 2010 regular legislative session, House Bill 237 was passed, creating a government restructuring task force to further explore the findings from the 2009 committee on government efficiency;
and 12 WHEREAS, the government restructuring task force found that the proliferation of departments and agencies was a serious concern;
and WHEREAS, the government restructuring task force found that the proliferation of departments and agencies was a serious concern;
and WHEREAS, the government restructuring task force recommended eliminating, merging and realigning certain e e 17 agencies for cost savings, efficiency and effectiveness;
and WHEREAS, the government restructuring task force e e 17 recommended eliminating, merging and realigning certain e e n d 18 agencies for cost savings, efficiency and effectiveness;
and e e n d 18 WHEREAS, several bills were introduced during the 2011 = = l ] 19 legislative session to implement the government restructuring a l r i 20 task force recommendations, but none of the bills passed;
and = = l ] 19 WHEREAS, several bills were introduced during the 2011 a l r i 20 legislative session to implement the government restructuring t e a t task force recommendations, but none of the bills passed;
and t e a t WHEREAS, during her term, Governor Susana Martinez m m 21 e d discussed the consolidation of several departments, but no r e 22 c e r c 23 action was taken;
and m m 21 e d WHEREAS, during her term, Governor Susana Martinez r e 22 c e r c 23 discussed the consolidation of several departments, but no e a n b 24 action was taken;
and e a n b 24 WHEREAS, the need to look at cost-saving measures, such as u [ the elimination or consolidation of agencies in state .212370.1 - 2 - government is still relevant;
and u [ WHEREAS, the need to look at cost-saving measures, such as .214441.2 - 2 - SRC/SJM 11 the elimination or consolidation of agencies in state government, is still relevant;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the New Mexico legislative council be requested to convene a new task force to study the previous recommendations of the 2010 government restructuring task force 6 and to determine if its recommendations are relevant for further legislative action;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the New Mexico legislative council be requested to assign an interim committee to study the previous recommendations of the 2010 government restructuring task force and to determine if its recommendations are relevant for further legislative action;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the new task force be created to be composed of six current or former legislators appointed by the New Mexico legislative council and six current or former cabinet secretaries appointed by the governor;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the interim committee assigned by the New Mexico legislative council request testimony from former legislators, former cabinet secretaries and others who currently or formerly worked in New Mexico state government in policy or decision-making positions;
and 12 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the new task force be requested to issue a report on its findings and conclusions by October 31, 2019;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the assigned interim committee be requested to issue a report on its findings and conclusions by October 31, 2019;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that duplicate copies of the report be filed with the legislative council service library;
and e e 17 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that duplicate copies of the report e e n d 18 be filed with the legislative council service library;
and e e 17 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be e e n d 18 transmitted to the governor and the co-chairs of the New Mexico = = l ] 19 legislative council.
and = = l ] 19 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be a l r i 20 transmitted to the governor and the co-chairs of the New Mexico t e a t legislative council.
a l r i 20 - 3 - t e a t m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .212370.1
m m 21 e d - 3 - r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .214441.2
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. action postponed indefinitely

  2. withdrawn from committee

  3. DO NOT PASS, replaced with committee substitute

  4. Sent to Senate Rules Committee & Senate Finance Committee

Sponsors

  • Bill Tallman · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Tallman, Bill

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (111)

111 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 111 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SJM 11?
SJM 11 is sponsored by Tallman, Bill.
What is the current status of SJM 11?
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SJM 11?
Track SJM 11 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SJM 11

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SJM 11

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →