PUBLIC PEACE, HEALTH, SAFETY & WELFARE
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 646 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 646.
You're tracking SB 646
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 646 — PUBLIC PEACE, HEALTH, SAFETY & WELFARE
Last action — action postponed indefinitely
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
45 added · 12 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Bill SB 646 clarify that any compelled statements made by police officers cannot be released to the public unless a court specifically orders it. This addition aims to protect the privacy of officers during investigations and ensures that their statements are not disclosed without legal oversight. This change matters because it seeks to balance transparency with the rights of law enforcement personnel, potentially fostering a more confidential and secure environment for them while they perform their duties.
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL 646 54 TH LEGISLATURE- STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSIO, 2019 INTRODUCED4 BY6 William8 H.10 AN ACT RELATING TO THE PUBLIC PEACE, HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE;
PayneAMENDING 6THE 8PEACE 10OFFICER'S ANEMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS ACT RELATING TO CLARIFY THAT THE PUBLICCOMPELLED PEACE,STATEMENT HEALTH,OF SAFETYAN ANDOFFICER WELFARE.SHALL NOT BE RELEASED EXCEPT UPON COURT ORDER.
1316 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
15 e t 17 wSECTION l1. n d 18 = = 19 a l i a e r 20 a t m m 21 d r e 22 c e s k 23 e a n b 24 u [ .213356.1
Section 29-14-3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1991, w l n d 18 Chapter 117, Section 3) is amended to read:
= = 19 "29-14-3.
[DEFINITION ] DEFINITIONS.--As used in the Peace a l i a e r 20 Officer's Employer-Employee Relations Act:
a t m m 21 A.
"compelled statement" means a statement provided d r e 22 by an officer to the officer's employer if the statement is c e s k 23 compelled under threat of dismissal from employment or any e a n b 24 other employment sanction;
and u [ B.
"peace officer" or "officer" means any employee .214162.1 SJC/SB 646 of a police or sheriff's department that is part of or administered by the state or any political subdivision of the state who is responsible for the prevention and detection of crime and the enforcement of the penal, traffic or highway laws of the state." SECTION 2.
Section 29-14-6 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1991, Chapter 117, Section 6) is amended to read:
"29-14-6.
INVESTIGATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS-- LIMITATIONS.-- A.
When any peace officer is under investigation for an administrative matter, the officer shall be permitted to produce any relevant documents, witnesses or other evidence to support [his] the case and [he] the officer may cross-examine any adverse witnesses during any grievance process or appeal involving disciplinary action.
B.
The compelled statement of an officer shall not e e 17 be released by the employer except upon court order." e e n d 18 - 2 - = = l ] 19 a l r i 20 t e a t m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .214162.1
View plain text versions (2)
- Substitute JU substitute Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
action postponed indefinitely
-
referred to Senate Public Affairs Committee & Senate Judiciary Committee
-
DO NOT PASS, replaced with committee substitute
-
not printed Senate Judiciary Committee
Sponsors
- Sander Rue · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Rue, Sander
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 646?
- SB 646 is sponsored by Rue, Sander.
- What is the current status of SB 646?
- This bill died with 2019 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 646?
- Track SB 646 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 646
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 646
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →