New Mexico 2019 Regular Session Status: Enacted 2 D cosponsors

SJM 2 — COMMIT TO ELIMINATION OF ACHIEVEMENT GAP

Last action — Signed

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 20, 2018. Enacted.

Prognosis

Advancing 54% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

82 added · 144 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to Bill SJM 2 adds a more detailed context to highlight the importance of addressing the achievement gap in New Mexico's education system. It specifies the demographic composition of students in the state, emphasizing that a significant majority are from minority backgrounds. This change is crucial as it underscores the urgent need for targeted educational strategies to support these students and ensure equitable opportunities for their success.

→
Previous
Latest
SENATE JOINT MEMORIAL 2 54TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSIO, 2019 INTRODUCED BY Michael Padilla and Christine Trujillo 6 8 10 A JOINT MEMORIAL EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR A STRENGTHENED COMMITMENT TO THE ELIMINATION OF THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP IN NEW MEXICO.
A JOINT MEMORIAL EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR A STRENGTHENED COMMITMENT TO THE ELIMINATION OF THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP IN NEW MEXICO.
14 WHEREAS, according to the national education association, despite decades of overall progress in narrowing achievement gaps, disparities in educational outcomes related to racial and e t 17 ethnic backgrounds persist;
5 WHEREAS, according to the national education association, despite decades of overall progress in narrowing achievement gaps, disparities in educational outcomes related to racial and ethnic backgrounds persist;
and w l n d 18 WHEREAS, minority students constitute seventy-five percent = = 19 a l of all students, totaling more than two hundred fifty thousand i a e r 20 students in the state;
and WHEREAS, minority students constitute seventy-five percent of all students, totaling more than two hundred fifty thousand students in the state;
and a t m m 21 WHEREAS, New Mexico is a rising minority-majority state d r e 22 whose minority numbers will continue to increase for c e s k 23 generations to come;
and WHEREAS, New Mexico is a rising minority-majority state whose minority numbers will continue to increase for generations to come;
and e a n b 24 WHEREAS, according to the public education department, u [ Latino students make up sixty-one percent of all students in .211204.1 the state, totaling more than two hundred twenty thousand students;
and WHEREAS, according to the public education department, Latino students make up sixty-one percent of all students in the state, totaling more than two hundred twenty thousand students;
Casey foundation, New Mexico is identified as the worst state in which to raise a child;
Casey foundation, New Mexico is identified as the worst state in SJM 2 Page 1 which to raise a child;
and WHEREAS, the cultural and linguistic diversity of the e e 17 state and equal opportunity for all New Mexicans should be e e n d 18 fostered;
and WHEREAS, the cultural and linguistic diversity of the state and equal opportunity for all New Mexicans should be fostered;
and = = l ] 19 WHEREAS, the first judicial district court ruled in the a l r i 20 consolidated cases of Yazzie v.
and WHEREAS, the first judicial district court ruled in the consolidated cases of Yazzie v.
State of New Mexico and t e a t Martinez v.
State of New Mexico and Martinez v.
State of New Mexico that the legislative and m m 21 e d r e 22 executive branches of government must make changes to address c e r c 23 the achievement gap and provide for a "sufficient education" e a n b 24 for all students, which includes funding and programming;
State of New Mexico that the legislative and executive branches of government must make changes to address the achievement gap and provide for a "sufficient education" for all students, which includes funding and programming;
and u [ WHEREAS, as held in the Yazzie/Martinez decision, the .211204.1 - 2 - funding provided has not been sufficient for all districts to provide the programs and services required by the constitution of New Mexico;
and WHEREAS, as held in the Yazzie/Martinez decision, the funding provided has not been sufficient for all districts to provide the programs and services required by the constitution of New Mexico;
and WHEREAS, in the Yazzie/Martinez decision, the court observed that it is the duty of the public education department to provide a constitutionally adequate education system that ensures that New Mexico schools have the resources necessary to give at-risk students the opportunity to obtain a uniform and sufficient education that prepares them for college and careers;
and WHEREAS, in the Yazzie/Martinez decision, the court observed that it is the duty of the public education department to provide a constitutionally adequate education system that ensures that New Mexico schools have the resources necessary to give at-risk students the opportunity SJM 2 Page 2 to obtain a uniform and sufficient education that prepares them for college and careers;
and e e 17 WHEREAS, sufficient financial resources must be applied to e e n d 18 combat the achievement gap that minority students face;
and WHEREAS, sufficient financial resources must be applied to combat the achievement gap that minority students face;
= = l ] 19 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE a l r i 20 STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the legislature's strengthened t e a t commitment to providing sufficient education for all students m m 21 e d r e 22 regardless of race be expressed;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the legislature's strengthened commitment to providing sufficient education for all students regardless of race be expressed;
and c e r c 23 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all agencies of the state, e a n b 24 school districts and local governments be encouraged to work u [ together to commit to the elimination of the achievement gap .211204.1 - 3 - between minority and non-minority students;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all agencies of the state, school districts and local governments be encouraged to work together to commit to the elimination of the achievement gap between minority and non-minority students;
- 4 - 8 10 12 14 16 e e 17 e e n d 18 = = l ] 19 a l r i 20 t e a t m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .211204.1
SJM 2 Page 3 25
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed House

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. Sent to House Education Committee

  5. passed Senate

  6. DO PASS committee report adopted

  7. DO PASS committee report adopted

  8. Sent to Senate Rules Committee & Senate Education Committee

  9. Sent to Senate Pre-file

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (110)

110 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 110 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SJM 2?
SJM 2 is sponsored by Linda M. Trujillo (Democrat) and Michael Padilla (Democrat).
What is the current status of SJM 2?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 20, 2018. Enacted.
Where can I track SJM 2?
Track SJM 2 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SJM 2

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SJM 2

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →