"URANIUM WORKERS DAY"
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HM 26 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HM 26.
You're tracking HM 26
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HM 26 — "URANIUM WORKERS DAY"
Last action — Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 04, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
78 added · 143 removedPlain-language change summary
The legislation was updated to include specific references to the history and impact of uranium mining in New Mexico, particularly focusing on sites within the Navajo Nation and the surrounding counties. It highlights the number of abandoned uranium mines and underscores the lack of reclamation for many of those sites. This change is important because it not only honors uranium workers but also raises awareness about the environmental and health issues associated with abandoned mines, emphasizing the need for action and support for affected communities.
HOUSEA MEMORIAL 26PROCLAIMING 54THFEBRUARY LEGISLATURE15, - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2019 INTRODUCED"URANIUM BYWORKERS EliseoDAY" LeeIN AlconTHE andHOUSE D.OF REPRESENTATIVES.
Wonda5 JohnsonWHEREAS, andthe HarryGrants Garciamineral belt, situated between Shiprock and Patriciathe A.Pueblo of Laguna, contains one of the world's richest uranium deposits;
Lundstromand 7WHEREAS, 9during Aa MEMORIALthirty-year PROCLAIMINGperiod FEBRUARYbeginning 15,in 20191948, "URANIUMthe WORKERSGrants DAY"mineral INbelt THEproduced HOUSEmore OFuranium REPRESENTATIVES.than any other district in the world and accounted for one-third of all of the uranium produced in the United States during that period;
14and WHEREAS, the Grantshistory mineralof belt,uranium situatedmining betweenhas Shiprockinvolved small "mom and thepop" Pueblosurface ofand Laguna,underground containsmines oneand oflarge- thescale world'scommercial richestsurface uraniumand deposits;underground mines;
and e t 17 WHEREAS, during a thirty-year period beginning in 1948, w l n d 18 the GrantsNavajo mineralNation belthas producedidentified moreover uraniumfive thanhundred anyabandoned other = = 19 a l district in the world and accounted for one-third of all of the i a e r 20 uranium producedmines inon thetribal Unitedlands; States during that period;
and a t m m 21 WHEREAS, the history of uranium mining hasand involvedminerals smalldivision dof rthe eenergy, 22minerals "mom and pop"natural surfaceresources anddepartment undergroundhas minesidentified andnearly large-scalesix chundred emine sand kexploration 23sites commercialin surfaceMcKinley, Cibola and undergroundSandoval mines;counties alone;
and e a n b 24 WHEREAS, the Navajo Nation has identified over five u [ hundred abandoned uranium mines on tribal lands;
and .213201.1 WHEREAS, the mining and minerals division of the energy, minerals and natural resources department has identified nearly six hundred mine and exploration sites in McKinley, Cibola and Sandoval counties alone;
and HM 26 WHEREAS, in addition to uranium mines, mills used to Page 1 process ore to yellowcake were constructed and operated at seven sites in New Mexico;
and WHEREAS, the energy, minerals and natural resources department estimates that about seven thousand people were e e 17 employed in the uranium industry in New Mexico in 1978, the e e n d 18 record year for uranium production in the state;
and = = l ] 19 WHEREAS, limited studies on the health risks to miners a l r i 20 from uranium exposure showed that Navajo uranium miners were t e a t three times more likely to die from lung cancer than the United m m 21 e d r e 22 States average;
and c e r c 23 WHEREAS, uranium miners were five times more likely to e a n b 24 develop lung cancer than the general population;
and u [ WHEREAS, exposure to dust, gases, exhaust and fumes as .213201.1 - 2 - well as the lack of protective clothing and safety measures, such as miners coming in contact with water from the mine ceilings or eating their lunches while at work, can result in non-malignant and malignant respiratory diseases;
and WHEREAS, the negative effects of uranium mining and HM 26 Page 2 milling and the health impacts from working in a mine are stressors for individuals and families;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that, in recognition e e 17 of the contributions of uranium workers and in recognition of e e n d 18 the ongoing health and environmental impacts as a result of = = l ] 19 historical uranium industrial operations in New Mexico, a l r i 20 February 15, 2019 be designated "Uranium Workers Day" in the t e a t house of representatives;
and m m 21 e d r e 22 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be c e r c 23 transmitted to members of the New Mexico congressional e a n b 24 delegation, the governor of the Pueblo of Laguna, the governor u [ of the Pueblo of Acoma, the president of the Navajo Nation and .213201.1 - 3 - the county commissioners of Cibola, Sandoval and McKinley counties.
-HM 426 -Page 53 725 9 11 13 15 e e 17 e e n d 18 = = l ] 19 a l r i 20 t e a t m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .213201.1
View plain text versions (2)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
passed House
-
withdrawn from committee
-
not printed, not referred to committee, tabled
Sponsors
- Eliseo Lee Alcon · Primary
- Patricia A. Lundstrom · Primary
- Martha Garcia · Primary
- D. Wonda Johnson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 108 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Alcon, Eliseo Lee
- Patricia A. Lundstrom Democrat
- Martha Garcia Democrat
- D. Wonda Johnson Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (108)
108 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 108 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HM 26?
- HM 26 is sponsored by Alcon, Eliseo Lee, Patricia A. Lundstrom (Democrat), Martha Garcia (Democrat), and D. Wonda Johnson (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HM 26?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 04, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track HM 26?
- Track HM 26 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HM 26
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HM 26
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →