INCORPORATE SANTA CRUZ DE LA CANADA
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HM 38 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HM 38.
You're tracking HM 38
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HM 38 — INCORPORATE SANTA CRUZ DE LA CANADA
Last action — Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 11, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
3 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
107 added · 143 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill HM 38 adds specific details about the historical founding of Santa Cruz de la Cañada, including its founding date and the governor responsible for its establishment. This change emphasizes the legal and historical context of the area, which may support its petition for incorporation as a municipality. Highlighting these details is important because it lends credibility to the request and helps inform lawmakers about the significance of the land claims associated with this settlement.
HOUSEA MEMORIAL 38REQUESTING 54THTHE LEGISLATUREBOARD -OF STATECOUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF NEWRIO MEXICOARRIBA -COUNTY FIRSTTO SESSION,FACILITATE 2019THE INTRODUCEDINCORPORATION BYOF EliseoSANTA LeeCRUZ AlconDE andLA JosephCAÑADA L.AS A MUNICIPALITY;
Sanchez and Andrea Romero 6 8 10 A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THE BOARDGUADALUPE OFHIDALGO COUNTYTREATY COMMISSIONERSDIVISION OF RIOTHE ARRIBAATTORNEY COUNTYGENERAL'S OFFICE TO FACILITATEEXAMINE THE INCORPORATIONLAND CLAIMS OF SANTA CRUZ DE LA CAÑADA ASAND AREPORT MUNICIPALITY;TO THE APPROPRIATE INTERIM LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE THAT STUDIES LAND GRANTS.
REQUESTINGWHEREAS, THEthe GUADALUPEVilla HIDALGONueva TREATYde DIVISIONSanta OFCruz THEde ATTORNEYlos GENERAL'SEspañoles OFFICEMéxicanos TOdel EXAMINERey THEDon LANDCarlos CLAIMSSegundo OFwas SANTAfounded CRUZon DEApril LA22, CAÑADA1695 ANDby REPORTGovernor TODon THEDiego APPROPRIATEde INTERIMVargas LEGISLATIVEZapata COMMITTEEy THATLuján STUDIESas LANDthe esecond tofficial 17Spanish GRANTS.municipality in New Mexico in accordance with Spanish law and with the approval of the Spanish crown;
wand lWHEREAS, nGovernor dDon 18Diego =de =Vargas 19Zapata ay lLuján WHEREAS,defined the Villaboundaries Nuevaof dethe Santasettlement Cruzas dethe lostributaries Españolesof ithe aSanta eCruz rriver 20from Méxicanosthe delmountains Reyto Donthe Carlos"Río Segundodel wasNorte", foundedas onthe AprilRio 22,Grande awas tcalled mat mthe 21time, 1695and by"as Governorfar Don Diego de Vargas Zapata y Luján as the dpueblos rof eNambé, 22Pojoaque, secondJacona, officialSan SpanishIldefonso municipalityand inSan NewJuan Mexicode inlos cCaballeros e s k 23 accordance with Spanish law and withon the approvalwest of the eRío adel nNorte"; b 24 Spanish crown;
and u [ WHEREAS, Governor Don Diego de Vargas Zapata y Luján .212321.2outlined defined the boundariesrights ofconveyed theby settlement as the tributariesofficial establishment of the Santasettlement's Cruzboundaries riveras fromland thethat mountains to the "Ríosettlement delmay Norte",HM as38 thePage Rio1 Grande"enjoy, washold calledand athave, the time, and "aswhich farI asmake thea pueblosseat ofand Nambé,town, Pojoaque,and Jacona,also Sanpossession Ildefonsoof andthe Sanhouses Juanwhich demay losbe Caballerosgiven andor onassigned theto westthem thein Ríoperson"; del Norte";
and WHEREAS, Governor Don Diego de Vargas Zapata y Luján outlined the rights conveyed by the official establishment of the settlement's boundaries as land that the settlement may "enjoy, hold and have, and which I make a seat and town, and also possession of the houses which may be given or assigned to them in person";
and WHEREAS, over time, the Villa Nueva de Santa Cruz de los e e 17 Españoles Méxicanos del Rey Don Carlos Segundo became generally e e n d 18 referred to as Santa Cruz de la Cañada and is known by that = = l ] 19 name today;
and a l r i 20 WHEREAS, Santa Cruz de la Cañada maintained a town t e a t council, referred to as a cabildo, under Spanish law from 1695 m m 21 e d r e 22 to 1821;
and c e r c 23 WHEREAS, Santa Cruz de la Cañada maintained a town e a n b 24 council, referred to as a ayuntamiento, under Mexican law from u [ 1821 to 1848;
and .212321.2 - 2 - WHEREAS, in 1848, in the peace treaty between the United States of America and the United Mexican States, known as the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, the lands that constitute modern-modern-day day New Mexico were ceded to the United States;
to ascertain the origin, nature, character, and extent of all claims to lands HM 38 Page 2 under the laws, usages, and customs of Spain and Mexico";
and WHEREAS, Santa Cruz de la Cañada is now an unincorporated community and does not have the land planning authority to e e 17 manage its growth, land use or establish water, sewer or refuse e e n d 18 facilities;
and = = l ] 19 WHEREAS, Santa Cruz de la Cañada is now bisected by the a l r i 20 Rio Arriba-Santa Fe county line, but the dominant portion is t e a t within Rio Arriba county;
m m 21 e d r e 22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF c e r c 23 REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that Rio Arriba e a n b 24 county be encouraged to facilitate the incorporation of Santa u [ Cruz de la Cañada as a municipality in order to for it to have .212321.2 - 3 - adequate governing authority needed to protect the health, safety and welfare of its residents;
and HM 38 Page 3 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Guadalupe Hidalgo treaty division of the attorney general's office be requested to present a report of its analysis to the appropriate interim legislative committee that studies land grants prior to November 1, 2019;
eHM e38 17Page - 4 -25 e e n d 18 = = l ] 19 a l r i 20 t e a t m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .212321.2
View plain text versions (2)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
passed House
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Local Government, Land Grants & Cultural Affairs Committee
Sponsors
- Eliseo Lee Alcon · Primary
- Andrea Romero · Primary
- Joseph Sanchez · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 109 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Alcon, Eliseo Lee
- Andrea Romero Democrat
- Joseph Sanchez Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (109)
109 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 109 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HM 38?
- HM 38 is sponsored by Alcon, Eliseo Lee, Andrea Romero (Democrat), and Joseph Sanchez (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HM 38?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 11, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track HM 38?
- Track HM 38 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HM 38
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HM 38
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →