ROAD MILEAGE-BASED USER FEE SYSTEM
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HM 77 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HM 77.
You're tracking HM 77
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HM 77 — ROAD MILEAGE-BASED USER FEE SYSTEM
Last action — Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 04, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
5 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (3 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
80 added · 146 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Bill HM 77 include the addition of specific lines emphasizing the need for the New Mexico Department of Transportation to engage with the Western Road Usage Charge Consortium and to propose the implementation of a mileage-based user fee system. This new fee structure aims to address declining revenue from gasoline taxes due to more fuel-efficient vehicles and the increasing popularity of electric vehicles. By shifting towards a mileage-based system, it allows funding for necessary improvements to the state's transportation infrastructure, enhancing safety and maintenance for all road users.
HOUSEA MEMORIAL 77REQUESTING 54THTHE LEGISLATUREDEPARTMENT -OF STATETRANSPORTATION OFTO NEWACTIVELY MEXICOPARTICIPATE -IN FIRSTTHE SESSION,WESTERN 2019ROAD INTRODUCEDUSAGE BYCHARGE PatricioCONSORTIUM RuilobaREGIONAL andSYSTEM PatriciaDEFINITION A.AND PILOT PLANNING PROJECT AND TO PROPOSE LEGISLATION TO IMPLEMENT A MILEAGE-BASED USER FEE SYSTEM IN NEW MEXICO.
Lundstrom8 WHEREAS, New Mexico's aging transportation infrastructure is in dire need of improvements and Robertopresents "Bobby"a J.safety hazard to those traveling on the state's roads;
Gonzalesand WHEREAS, improvements to New Mexico's transportation infrastructure, including roads and Rodolphobridges, "Rudy"are S.funded in large part by the state's gasoline tax;
Martinez and HarryWHEREAS, Garciagasoline 8tax 10revenues Aare MEMORIALexpected REQUESTINGto THEdecrease DEPARTMENTin OFthe TRANSPORTATIONfuture TOas ACTIVELYa PARTICIPATEresult INof THEincreasing WESTERNpassenger ROADvehicle USAGEfuel CHARGEefficiency CONSORTIUMand REGIONALincreasing SYSTEMuse DEFINITIONof ANDmotor PILOTvehicles PLANNINGusing PROJECTalternative ANDfuels; TO PROPOSE LEGISLATION TO IMPLEMENT A MILEAGE-BASED USER FEE SYSTEM IN NEW MEXICO.
e t 17 WHEREAS, New Mexico's aging transportation infrastructure w l n d 18 is in dire need of improvements and presents a safety hazard to = = 19 a l those traveling on the state's roads;
and i a e r 20 WHEREAS, improvements to New Mexico's transportation a t m m 21 infrastructure, including roads and bridges, are funded in d r e 22 large part by the state's gasoline tax;
and c e s k 23 WHEREAS, gasoline tax revenues are expected to decrease in e a n b 24 the future as a result of increasing passenger vehicle fuel u [ efficiency and increasing use of motor vehicles using .214515.1 alternative fuels;
and HM 77 WHEREAS, the adoption of mileage-based user fees will Page 1 help ensure that users of motor vehicles that use alternative fuels or electricity will pay their fair share of transportation infrastructure improvements;
and e e 17 WHEREAS, the western road usage charge consortium is an e e n d 18 organization that brings together leaders from state = = l ] 19 transportation organizations of fourteen western states, a l r i 20 including New Mexico, to share best practices and research t e a t regarding mileage-based user fees;
and m m 21 e d r e 22 WHEREAS, one western road usage charge consortium member c e r c 23 state, Oregon, has enacted a policy to implement a mileage- e a n b 24 based user fee system, and five other member states, u [ California, Colorado, Hawaii, Washington and Utah, are .214515.1 - 2 - currently testing mileage-based user fee pilot programs;
and WHEREAS, eleven western road usage charge consortium member states are participating in the western road usage charge consortium regional system definition and pilot HM 77 Page 2 planning project, but New Mexico is not participating;
and WHEREAS, New Mexico needs to become actively involved in e e 17 researching and evaluating options for implementing mileage- e e n d 18 based user fee systems in order to maintain sufficient funding = = l ] 19 for improvements to the state's transportation infrastructure;
a l r i 20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF t e a t REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the department m m 21 e d r e 22 of transportation be requested to actively participate in the c e r c 23 western road usage charge consortium regional system definition e a n b 24 and pilot planning project and research options for u [ implementing mileage-based user fee systems that would be .214515.1 - 3 - suitable for New Mexico;
-HM 477 -Page 113 13 15 e e 17 e e n d 18 = = l ] 19 a l r i 20 t e a t m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .214515.1
View plain text versions (2)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
passed House
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Transportation, Public Works & Capital Improvements Committee
Sponsors
- Patricio Ruiloba · Primary
- Martha Garcia · Primary
- Alan T. Martinez · Primary
- Anita Gonzales · Primary
- Patricia A. Lundstrom · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →5 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 107 not signed on
Sponsors (5)
- Ruiloba, Patricio
- Martha Garcia Democrat
- Alan T. Martinez Republican
- Anita Gonzales Democrat
- Patricia A. Lundstrom Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (107)
107 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 107 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HM 77?
- HM 77 is sponsored by Ruiloba, Patricio, Martha Garcia (Democrat), Alan T. Martinez (Republican), Anita Gonzales (Democrat), and Patricia A. Lundstrom (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HM 77?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 04, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track HM 77?
- Track HM 77 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HM 77
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HM 77
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →