New Mexico 2019 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

HB 208 — HAZARDOUS OFFICER STATEMENT UPON COURT ORDER

Last action — Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

110 added · 184 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to Bill HB 208 clarifies that statements made by officers, when compelled to speak under threat of dismissal, will only be released if a court orders it. This change is significant because it helps protect the privacy of officers and ensures that sensitive information shared in potentially high-pressure situations is not easily accessible to the public. By restricting the release of these statements, the amendment aims to promote a fairer environment for officers and protect their rights during employer-employee interactions.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE BILL 208 54TH LEGISLATURE - STATEOFNEWMEXICO- FIRST SESSION, 2019 INTRODUCED BY Nathan P.
AN ACT RELATING TO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES;
Small 6 8 10 AN ACT RELATING TO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES;
AMENDING THE HAZARDOUS DUTY OFFICERS' EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS ACT TO CLARIFY THAT THE COMPELLED STATEMENT OF AN OFFICER SHALL NOT BE RELEASED EXCEPT UPON COURT ORDER.
AMENDING THE HAZARDOUS DUTY OFFICERS' EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS ACT TO CLARIFY THAT THE COMPELLED STATEMENT OF AN OFFICER SHALL NOT BE RELEASED EXCEPT 14 UPON COURT ORDER.
7 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
16 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
SECTION 1.
e t 17 SECTION 1.
Section 10-7F-1 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2010, Chapter 62, Section 1) is amended to read:
Section 10-7F-1 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2010, w l n d 18 Chapter 62, Section 1) is amended to read:
"10-7F-1.
= = 19 "10-7F-1.
SHORT TITLE.--Chapter 10, Article 7F NMSA 1978 may be cited as the "Hazardous Duty Officers' Employer- Employee Relations Act"." SECTION 2.
SHORT TITLE.--[This act ] Chapter 10, Article 7F a l i a e r 20 NMSA 1978 may be cited as the "Hazardous Duty Officers' a t m m 21 Employer-Employee Relations Act"." d r e 22 SECTION 2.
Section 10-7F-2 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2010, Chapter 62, Section 2) is amended to read:
Section 10-7F-2 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2010, c e s k 23 Chapter 62, Section 2) is amended to read:
"10-7F-2.
e a n b 24 "10-7F-2.
DEFINITIONS.--As used in the Hazardous Duty Officers' Employer-Employee Relations Act:
DEFINITIONS.--As used in the Hazardous Duty u [ Officers' Employer-Employee Relations Act:
A.
.212333.1 A.
[A.] B.
B.
"emergency medical technician" means an 6 individual who has been licensed by the department of health as an emergency medical technician;
"emergency medical technician" means an individual who has been licensed by the department of health as an emergency medical technician;
[B.] C.
C.
"firefighter" means an individual who is employed as a non-volunteer firefighter and who has taken the oath prescribed for firefighters;
"firefighter" means an individual who is employed as a non-volunteer firefighter and who has taken the HB 208 Page 1 oath prescribed for firefighters;
[C.] D.
D.
"hazardous duty officer" or "officer" means an individual who is employed full time by the state or a political subdivision of the state as a firefighter, emergency medical technician or paramedic, provided that "hazardous duty officer" does not include an individual who has not completed the probationary period established by the individual's e e 17 employer as a condition of employment;
"hazardous duty officer" or "officer" means an individual who is employed full time by the state or a political subdivision of the state as a firefighter, emergency medical technician or paramedic, provided that "hazardous duty officer" does not include an individual who has not completed the probationary period established by the individual's employer as a condition of employment;
and e e n d 18 [D.] E.
and E.
"paramedic" means an individual who has = = l ] 19 been licensed by the department of health as a paramedic." a l r i 20 SECTION 3.
"paramedic" means an individual who has been licensed by the department of health as a paramedic." SECTION 3.
Section 10-7F-3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2010, t e a t Chapter 62, Section 3) is amended to read:
Section 10-7F-3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2010, Chapter 62, Section 3) is amended to read:
m m 21 e d r e 22 "10-7F-3.
"10-7F-3.
INVESTIGATIONS OF HAZARDOUS DUTY OFFICERS-- c e r c 23 REQUIREMENTS--LIMITATION.-- e a n b 24 A.
INVESTIGATIONS OF HAZARDOUS DUTY OFFICERS-- REQUIREMENTS--LIMITATION.-- A.
When a hazardous duty officer is under u [ investigation by the officer's employer for alleged actions .212333.1 - 2 - that could result in administrative sanctions being levied against the officer, any [interrogation ] investigative interview of the officer shall be conducted only:
When a hazardous duty officer is under investigation by the officer's employer for alleged actions that could result in administrative sanctions being levied against the officer, any investigative interview of the officer shall be conducted only:
6 [(1)] (2) when the officer is on duty or during the officer's normal waking hours, unless the urgency of the investigation requires otherwise;
(2) when the officer is on duty or during the officer's normal waking hours, unless the urgency of the investigation requires otherwise;
and [(2)] (3) at the employer's facility, unless the urgency of the investigation requires otherwise.
and (3) at the employer's facility, unless the HB 208 Page 2 urgency of the investigation requires otherwise.
Prior to commencement of an [interrogation session] investigative interview:
Prior to commencement of an investigative interview:
(1) the officer shall be informed of the name and rank of the person in charge of the [interrogation ] investigative interview and all other persons who will be ] investigative interview;
(1) the officer shall be informed of the name and rank of the person in charge of the investigative interview and all other persons who will be present during the investigative interview;
present during the [interrogation e e 17 (2) the officer shall be informed of the e e n d 18 nature of the investigation, and the names of all known = = l ] 19 complainants shall be disclosed to the officer unless the chief a l r i 20 administrator of the officer's employer determines that the t e a t identification of the complainant shall not be disclosed m m 21 e d r e 22 because it is necessary for the protection of an informant or c e r c 23 because disclosure would jeopardize or compromise the integrity e a n b 24 or security of the investigation;
(2) the officer shall be informed of the nature of the investigation, and the names of all known complainants shall be disclosed to the officer unless the chief administrator of the officer's employer determines that the identification of the complainant shall not be disclosed because it is necessary for the protection of an informant or because disclosure would jeopardize or compromise the integrity or security of the investigation;
and u [ (3) a reasonable attempt shall be made to .212333.1 - 3 - notify the officer's immediate superior of the pending [interrogation ] investigative interview.
and (3) a reasonable attempt shall be made to notify the officer's immediate superior of the pending investigative interview.
During an [interrogation session ] investigative interview, the following requirements shall be adhered to:
During an investigative interview, the following requirements shall be adhered to:
[(1)] (2) each [interrogation] investigative interview session shall not exceed two hours unless the parties mutually consent to continuation of the session;
(2) each investigative interview session HB 208 Page 3 shall not exceed two hours unless the parties mutually consent to continuation of the session;
[(2)] (3) there shall not be more than one [interrogation ] investigative interview session within a twenty-four-hour period, unless the parties mutually consent to additional sessions, provided that there shall be at least a one-hour rest period between the sessions;
(3) there shall not be more than one investigative interview session within a twenty-four-hour period, unless the parties mutually consent to additional sessions, provided that there shall be at least a one-hour rest period between the sessions;
e e 17 [(3)] (4) there shall not be more than two e e n d 18 [interrogators ] investigators at any given time;
(4) there shall not be more than two investigators at any given time;
= = l ] 19 [(4)] (5) the officer shall be allowed to a l r i 20 attend to physical necessities as they occur in the course of t e a t an [interrogation session ] investigative interview;
(5) the officer shall be allowed to attend to physical necessities as they occur in the course of an investigative interview;
and m m 21 e d r e 22 [(5)] (6) the officer shall not be subjected c e r c 23 to offensive language or illegal coercion by [the officer's e a n b 24 interrogator] an investigator in the course of an u [ [interrogation session ] investigative interview.
and (6) the officer shall not be subjected to offensive language or illegal coercion by an investigator in the course of an investigative interview.
.212333.1 - 4 - D.
D.
An [interrogation ] investigative interview of an officer shall be recorded, and the complete [interrogation ] investigative interview shall be published as a transcript;
An investigative interview of an officer shall be recorded, and the complete investigative interview shall be published as a transcript;
provided that any recesses called during the [interrogation ] shall be noted in the transcript.
provided that any recesses called during the investigative interview shall be noted in the transcript.
An investigative interview accurate copy of the transcript or tape shall be provided to the officer, upon written request, no later than fifteen working days after the investigation has been completed.
An accurate copy of the transcript or tape shall be provided to the officer, upon written request, no later than fifteen working days after the investigation has been completed.
Show all 41 changed rows (1 more)
Previous
Latest
The compelled statement of an officer shall not be released by the employer except upon court order." - 5 - 13 15 e e 17 e e n d 18 = = l ] 19 a l r i 20 t e a t m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .212333.1
The compelled statement of an officer shall not be released by the employer except upon court order." HB 208 Page 4
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed Senate

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. Sent to Senate Judiciary Committee

  5. passed House

  6. DO PASS committee report adopted

  7. DO PASS committee report adopted

  8. Sent to House Labor, Veterans & Military Affairs Committee & House Judiciary Committee

  9. Sent to House Pre-file

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (111)

111 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 111 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

house passage

Passed 64 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 30004
Republican 11001
Democrat 23001
Total 64006
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (70)
Member Party Vote
Akhil — Yea
Allison — Yea
Madrid — Yea
Martmnez, Javier — Yea
Bash — Yea
Black — Yea
Pratt — Yea
Rehm — Yea
Salazar, Tomás — Yea
Sanchez — Yea
Stansbury — Yea
Gonzales — Yea
Hochman — Yea
Garcma, M.P. — Not Voting
Alcon — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Baldonado — Yea
Bandy — Yea
Chasey — Yea
Cook — Not Voting
Crowder — Yea
Egolf — Yea
Ely — Yea
Fajardo — Yea
Harper — Not Voting
Lewis — Yea
Louis — Not Voting
Nibert — Yea
Powdrell-Culbert — Yea
Ruiloba — Yea
Schmedes — Yea
Stapleton — Yea
Strickler — Yea
Sweetser — Yea
Andrea Romero Democrat Yea
Angelica Rubio Democrat Yea
Antonio Maestas Democrat Yea
Christine Chandler Democrat Yea
D. Wonda Johnson Democrat Yea
Debra M. Sariñana Democrat Yea
Derrick J. Lente Democrat Yea
Doreen Y. Gallegos Democrat Yea
Elizabeth "Liz" Thomson Democrat Yea
G. Andrés Romero Democrat Yea
Joanne J. Ferrary Democrat Yea
Joy Garratt Democrat Yea
Linda M. Trujillo Democrat Yea
Linda M. Trujillo Democrat Yea
Linda M. Trujillo Democrat Yea
Martha Garcia Democrat Yea
Matthew McQueen Democrat Yea
Micaela Lara Cadena Democrat Yea
Natalie Figueroa Democrat Yea
Nathan P. Small Democrat Yea
Patricia A. Lundstrom Democrat Yea
Patricia Roybal Caballero Democrat Yea
Raymundo Lara Democrat Yea
Susan K. Herrera Democrat Not Voting
Alan T. Martinez Republican Yea
Candy Spence Ezzell Republican Yea
Cathrynn N. Brown Republican Yea
David M. Gallegos Republican Yea
Gail Armstrong Republican Yea
Gail Armstrong Republican Not Voting
Jack Chatfield Republican Yea
James G. Townsend Republican Yea
Larry R. Scott Republican Yea
Martin R. Zamora Republican Yea
Rebecca Dow Republican Yea
Rod Montoya Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 208?
HB 208 is sponsored by Nathan P. Small (Democrat).
What is the current status of HB 208?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 10, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 208?
Track HB 208 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 208

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 208

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →