SAFE HARBOR FOR NURSES ACT
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 82 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 82.
You're tracking SB 82
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 82 — SAFE HARBOR FOR NURSES ACT
Last action — Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 17, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
3 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
111 added · 151 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes to SB 82, titled the "Safe Harbor for Nurses Act," establish clear protections for registered nurses and licensed practical nurses. The bill now requires employers to create a process for nurses to invoke a "safe harbor" if they are asked to perform tasks they believe violate their legal duties. This is important because it helps ensure that nurses can advocate for patient safety without fear of retaliation from their employers. Overall, these amendments empower nurses to speak up about unsafe practices, ultimately improving healthcare standards.
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL 82 54 TH LEGISLATURE- STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSIO, 2019 4 6 8 10 AN ACT RELATING TO HEALTH CARE;
REQUIRING EMPLOYERS TO DEVELOP A PROCESS FOR INVOKING SAFE e t 17 HARBOR;
PREVENTING EMPLOYERS FROM DISCIPLINING NURSES FOR w l n d 18 INVOKING SAFE HARBOR.
= = 19 a l i a e r 20 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
a t m m 21 SECTION 1.
[NEW MATERIAL ] SHORT TITLE.--This act may be d r e 22 cited as the "Safe Harbor for Nurses Act".
c e s k 23 SECTION 2.
[NEW MATERIAL] DEFINITIONS.--As used in the e a n b 24 Safe Harbor for Nurses Act:
u [ A.
"assignment" means the designated responsibility .213544.3 SJC/SB 82 for the provision or supervision of nursing care for a defined work period in a defined work setting, including the specified functions, duties, practitioner orders, supervisory directives and amount of work designated as an individual nurse's responsibility;
"good faith" means taking action supported by a sincere belief with a reasonable factual or legal basis other SJC/SB 82 Page 1 than the nurse's moral, religious or personal beliefs;
e e 17 (1) protects a registered nurse or a licensed e e n d 18 practical nurse from adverse action by the health care facility = = l ] 19 where the nurse is working when the nurse makes a good faith a l r i 20 request to be allowed to reject an assignment, which request is t e a t based on the nurse's:
m m 21 e d (a) assessment of the nurse's own r e 22 c e r c 23 education, knowledge, competence or experience;
and e a n b 24 (b) immediate assessment of the risk for u [ patient safety or potential violation of the Nursing Practice .213544.3 - 2 - SJC/SB 82 Act or board of nursing rules;
[NEW MATERIAL ] SAFE HARBOR--HEALTH CARE FACILITY RESPONSIBILITY.-- A.
(1) in the nurse's good faith judgment, the nurse lacks the basic knowledge, skills or abilities SJC/SB 82 Page 2 necessary to deliver nursing care that is safe and that meets the minimum standards of care to such an extent that accepting the assignment would expose one or more patients to an unjustifiable risk of harm or would constitute a violation of the Nursing Practice Act or board of nursing rules;
e e 17 B.
A nurse who intends to invoke safe harbor shall e e n d 18 invoke it before the nurse engages in conduct or an assignment = = l ] 19 giving rise to the nurse's request for safe harbor.
A nurse a l r i 20 may also invoke safe harbor at any time during the work period, t e a t when an initial assignment changes and, in the nurse's good m m 21 e d faith judgment, the change creates a situation that comports r e 22 c e r c 23 with the requirements for invoking safe harbor pursuant to e a n b 24 Subsection A of this section.
A health care facility shall u [ develop a process by which a nurse employed or contracted by .213544.3 - 3 - SJC/SB 82 that facility may invoke safe harbor.
(3) written documentation with the date, SJC/SB 82 Page 3 time and location of the invocation of safe harbor and the reason for invocation, signed by the supervisor and the nurse;
and (b) is used to determine whether additional action is required to minimize the likelihood of e e 17 similar situations in the future;
and e e n d 18 (5) documentation of the resolution and review = = l ] 19 of the matter in which safe harbor was invoked.
a l r i 20 D.
A health care facility shall not retaliate t e a t against, demote, suspend, terminate, discipline, discriminate m m 21 e d against or report any action to the board of nursing when a r e 22 c e r c 23 nurse makes a good faith request for safe harbor.
eSJC/SB a82 nPage b 24 - 4 -25 u [ .213544.3
View plain text versions (3)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Substitute JU substitute pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
passed House
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
referred to House Health & Human Services Committee & House Labor, Veterans & Military Affairs Committee
-
Sent to House Health & Human Services Committee & House Judiciary Committee
-
passed Senate
-
DO NOT PASS, replaced with committee substitute
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to Senate Public Affairs Committee & Senate Judiciary Committee
-
Sent to Senate Pre-file
Sponsors
- Gay G. Kernan · Primary
- Mary Kay Papen · Primary
- Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 109 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Kernan, Gay G.
- Papen, Mary Kay
- Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (109)
109 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 109 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| PAPEN | — | Yea |
| PAYNE | — | Yea |
| BURT | — | Yea |
| PIRTLE | — | Yea |
| CANDELARIA | — | Yea |
| RODRIGUEZ | — | Yea |
| CISNEROS | — | Yea |
| RUE | — | Yea |
| FULFER | — | Yea |
| SANCHEZ | — | Yea |
| GOULD | — | Yea |
| GRIGGS | — | Yea |
| SEDILLO-LOPEZ | — | Yea |
| INGLE | — | Yea |
| IVEY-SOTO | — | Yea |
| KERNAN | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| MOORES | — | Yea |
| NEVILLE | — | Yea |
| TALLMAN | — | Yea |
| O'NEILL | — | Yea |
| WHITE | — | Yea |
| SAPIEN | — | Not Voting |
| ORTIZ y PINO | — | Yea |
| Antoinette Sedillo Lopez | Democrat | Yea |
| Benny Shendo, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics | Democrat | Yea |
| George K. Muñoz | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Steinborn | Democrat | Yea |
| Joseph Cervantes | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Padilla | Democrat | Yea |
| Mimi Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Pete Campos | Democrat | Yea |
| Peter Wirth | Democrat | Yea |
| Shannon D. Pinto | Democrat | Yea |
| William P. Soules | Democrat | Yea |
| Alan T. Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Brian G. Baca | Republican | Yea |
| Craig W. Brandt | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gabriel Ramos | Republican | Yea |
| Pat Woods | Republican | Yea |
| William E. Sharer | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 82?
- SB 82 is sponsored by Kernan, Gay G., Papen, Mary Kay, and Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 82?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 17, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 82?
- Track SB 82 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 82
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 82
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →