New Mexico 2019 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 262 — UNIFORM MONEY SERVICES ACT CHANGES

Last action — Signed

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 21, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

52 added · 70 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill SB 262 includes a key addition that allows the director to issue cease and desist orders not only based on direct violations but also for violations involving an authorized delegate of a licensee. This change is important because it reinforces oversight and accountability, ensuring that violators cannot circumvent regulations by using third parties. Ultimately, it aims to protect customers and the public from harmful financial practices more effectively.

→
Previous
Latest
SENATE BILL 262 54TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSIO, 2019 INTRODUCED BY William H.
AN ACT RELATING TO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS;
Payne 6 8 10 AN ACT RELATING TO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS;
14 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
e t 17 "58-32-803.
"58-32-803.
ORDERS TO CEASE AND DESIST.-- w l n d 18 A.
ORDERS TO CEASE AND DESIST.-- A.
If the director determines that a violation of = = 19 the Uniform Money Services Act, or of a rule adopted or an a l i a e r 20 order issued pursuant to that act, by a licensee or authorized a t m m 21 delegate is likely to cause immediate and irreparable harm to d r e 22 the licensee, its customers or the public as a result of the c e s k 23 violation, or causes insolvency or significant dissipation of e a n b 24 assets of the licensee, the director may issue an order u [ requiring the licensee or authorized delegate to cease and .210864.1 desist from the violation.
If the director determines that a violation of the Uniform Money Services Act, or of a rule adopted or an order issued pursuant to that act, by a licensee or authorized delegate is likely to cause immediate and irreparable harm to the licensee, its customers or the public as a result of the violation, or causes insolvency or significant dissipation of assets of the licensee, the director may issue an order requiring the licensee or authorized delegate to cease and desist from the violation.
An order to cease and desist remains effective and enforceable pending the completion of an administrative proceeding pursuant to Section [801 or 802 of the Uniform Money Services Act] 58-32-901 or 58-32-902 NMSA 1978.
An order to cease and desist remains effective and enforceable pending the completion of an administrative SB 262 Page 1 proceeding pursuant to Section 58-32-901 or 58-32-902 NMSA 1978.
A licensee or an authorized delegate that is served with an order to cease and desist may petition the district court for a judicial order setting aside, limiting or suspending the enforcement, operation or effectiveness of the order pending the completion of an administrative proceeding pursuant to Section [801 or 802 of the Uniform Money Services e e 17 Act] 58-32-901 or 58-32-902 NMSA 1978.
A licensee or an authorized delegate that is served with an order to cease and desist may petition the district court for a judicial order setting aside, limiting or suspending the enforcement, operation or effectiveness of the order pending the completion of an administrative proceeding pursuant to Section 58-32-901 or 58-32-902 NMSA 1978.
e e n d 18 E.
E.
An order to cease and desist expires unless the = = l ] 19 director commences an administrative proceeding pursuant to a l r i 20 Section [801 or 802 of the Uniform Money Services Act ] t e a t 58-32-901 or 58-32-902 NMSA 1978 within ten days after it is m m 21 e d r e 22 issued." c e r c 23 - 2 - e a n b 24 u [ .210864.1
An order to cease and desist expires unless the director commences an administrative proceeding pursuant to Section 58-32-901 or 58-32-902 NMSA 1978 within ten days after it is issued." SB 262 Page 2 25
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed House

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. DO PASS committee report adopted

  5. Sent to House Commerce & Economic Development Committee & House Judiciary Committee

  6. passed Senate

  7. DO PASS committee report adopted

  8. DO PASS committee report adopted

  9. Sent to Senate Corporations and Transportation Committee & Senate Judiciary Committee

Sponsors

  • William H. Payne · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Payne, William H.

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (111)

111 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 111 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

senate passage

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 5001
Unaffiliated 22002
Democrat 9003
Total 36006
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (42)
Member Party Vote
PAPEN — Yea
PAYNE — Yea
BURT — Yea
PIRTLE — Yea
CANDELARIA — Yea
RODRIGUEZ — Yea
CISNEROS — Yea
RUE — Yea
FULFER — Yea
SANCHEZ — Yea
GOULD — Yea
GRIGGS — Yea
SEDILLO-LOPEZ — Yea
INGLE — Yea
IVEY-SOTO — Yea
KERNAN — Yea
SMITH — Yea
MOORES — Yea
NEVILLE — Yea
TALLMAN — Yea
O'NEILL — Yea
SAPIEN — Not Voting
WHITE — Not Voting
ORTIZ y PINO — Yea
Antoinette Sedillo Lopez Democrat Yea
Benny Shendo, Jr. Democrat Yea
Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics Democrat Yea
George K. Muñoz Democrat Not Voting
Jeff Steinborn Democrat Yea
Joseph Cervantes Democrat Not Voting
Michael Padilla Democrat Yea
Mimi Stewart Democrat Yea
Pete Campos Democrat Yea
Peter Wirth Democrat Yea
Shannon D. Pinto Democrat Not Voting
William P. Soules Democrat Yea
Alan T. Martinez Republican Yea
Brian G. Baca Republican Yea
Craig W. Brandt Republican Yea
Gabriel Ramos Republican Yea
Pat Woods Republican Not Voting
William E. Sharer Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 262?
SB 262 is sponsored by Payne, William H..
What is the current status of SB 262?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 21, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 262?
Track SB 262 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 262

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 262

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →