SB 96 — CONVICTION INFO ON JOB APPLICATIONS
Last action — Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 18, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
53 added · 81 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of SB 96 adds a new section that prohibits private employers from asking about an applicant's arrest or conviction history on their initial job applications. This change is important because it can help ex-convicts have a fair chance at employment by allowing them to present their qualifications first, without being automatically disqualified due to past offenses. The bill also establishes a grievance process, giving applicants a way to address any issues that arise related to this new rule. This approach aims to reduce stigma and promote reintegration into the workforce for individuals with criminal records.
SENATEAN FLOORACT SUBSTITUTERELATING FORTO SENATEEMPLOYMENT JUDICIARYOF COMMITTEEEX-CONVICTS; SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL 96 54TH LEGISLATURE - STATEOFNEWMEXICO- FIRST SESSION, 2019 Pursuant to House Rule 24-1, this document incorporates amendments that have been adopted prior to consideration of this measure by the House.
ItPROHIBITING isPRIVATE aEMPLOYERS toolFROM toINQUIRING showABOUT theAN amendmentsAPPLICANT'S inHISTORY contextOF andARREST isOR notCONVICTION toON beAN usedINITIAL forEMPLOYMENT theAPPLICATION; purpose of amendments.
ANPROVIDING ACTA hGRIEVANCE RELATINGPROCESS. TO EMPLOYMENT OF EX-CONVICTS;
PROHIBITING7 PRIVATEBE gIT oENACTED EMPLOYERSBY FROMTHE INQUIRINGLEGISLATURE ABOUTOF ANTHE APPLICANT'SSTATE HISTORY OF ARRESTNEW tMEXICO: hr g e i k OR CONVICTION ON AN INITIAL EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION;
PROVIDINGSECTION A1. h r i s GRIEVANCE PROCESS.
hSection ,28-2-1 t,NMSA e1978 u(being gLaws e1974, bChapter l78, eSection e1) his BEamended ITto ENACTEDread: BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
n"28-2-1. d d i = = o h SECTION 1.
SectionSHORT 28-2-1TITLE.--Chapter NMSA28, 1978Article (being2 LawsNMSA 1974,1978 lmay ]be bcited ,das ithe a"Criminal ºOffender eEmployment ChapterAct"." 78,SECTION Section2. 1) is amended to read:
r i = r t e w d m a n o "28-2-1.
SHORT TITLE.--[Sections 1 through 6 of this act ] d m :
b e d s º o t n = .214007.1 s k m e e a n e d r e l u [ A d SFl/SJC/SB 96 Chapter 28, Article 2 NMSA 1978 may be cited as the "Criminal Offender Employment Act"." SECTION 2.
"[NEW"EMPLOYMENT MATERIAL ] EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION--DETERMINATION--PRIVATE PRIVATE EMPLOYERS.-- A.
Nothing in this section shall prohibit an employer from notifying Sflº the public or»Sflor an applicant that the law or the employer's policy could disqualify an SFL/SJC/SB 96 applicant who has a certain criminal history from employment inPage h1 in particular positions with that employer.
u » r B.
An applicant who claims to be aggrieved by a t h g e violation of Subsection A of this section may seek relief under l i h r i s the Human Rights Act pursuant to the process set out in h , e h Sections 28-1-10 through 28-1-13 NMSA 1978." tSFL/SJC/SB u96 gPage e b l - 2 -7 e9 e25 , gh n d d i = = o h l ] b ,d i a º r e r = t e w d m a n o d m :
b r e t º o t n = .214007.1 s k m e e a n e d r e l u [ A d
View plain text versions (5)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Amended Amendments in Context pdf
- Substitute JU substitute pdf
- Substitute FS substitute pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
passed House
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Labor, Veterans & Military Affairs Committee & House State Government, Elections & Indian Affairs Committee
-
passed Senate
-
floor substitute adopted (1 amendment)
-
floor substitute adopted
-
DO NOT PASS, replaced with committee substitute
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to Senate Public Affairs Committee & Senate Judiciary Committee
-
Sent to Senate Pre-file
Sponsors
- Alonzo Baldonado · Primary
- Bill B. O'Neill · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on · 3 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Baldonado, Alonzo
- O'Neill, Bill B.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (110)
110 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 110 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 28 | 11 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 26% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| PAPEN | — | Yea |
| CANDELARIA | — | Yea |
| RODRIGUEZ | — | Yea |
| CISNEROS | — | Yea |
| RUE | — | Yea |
| SANCHEZ | — | Yea |
| GRIGGS | — | Yea |
| SEDILLO-LOPEZ | — | Yea |
| IVEY-SOTO | — | Yea |
| KERNAN | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| TALLMAN | — | Yea |
| O'NEILL | — | Yea |
| WHITE | — | Yea |
| PAYNE | — | Nay |
| BURT | — | Nay |
| PIRTLE | — | Nay |
| FULFER | — | Nay |
| GOULD | — | Nay |
| INGLE | — | Nay |
| MOORES | — | Nay |
| NEVILLE | — | Nay |
| SAPIEN | — | Not Voting |
| ORTIZ y PINO | — | Yea |
| Antoinette Sedillo Lopez | Democrat | Yea |
| Benny Shendo, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics | Democrat | Yea |
| George K. Muñoz | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Jeff Steinborn | Democrat | Yea |
| Joseph Cervantes | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Michael Padilla | Democrat | Yea |
| Mimi Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Pete Campos | Democrat | Yea |
| Peter Wirth | Democrat | Yea |
| Shannon D. Pinto | Democrat | Yea |
| William P. Soules | Democrat | Yea |
| Alan T. Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Brian G. Baca | Republican | Nay |
| Craig W. Brandt | Republican | Yea |
| Gabriel Ramos | Republican | Yea |
| Pat Woods | Republican | Nay |
| William E. Sharer | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 96?
- SB 96 is sponsored by Baldonado, Alonzo and O'Neill, Bill B..
- What is the current status of SB 96?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 18, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 96?
- Track SB 96 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 96
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 96
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →