New Mexico 2019 Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 96 — CONVICTION INFO ON JOB APPLICATIONS

Last action — Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 18, 2018. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

53 added · 81 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised version of SB 96 adds a new section that prohibits private employers from asking about an applicant's arrest or conviction history on their initial job applications. This change is important because it can help ex-convicts have a fair chance at employment by allowing them to present their qualifications first, without being automatically disqualified due to past offenses. The bill also establishes a grievance process, giving applicants a way to address any issues that arise related to this new rule. This approach aims to reduce stigma and promote reintegration into the workforce for individuals with criminal records.

→
Previous
Latest
SENATE FLOOR SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL 96 54TH LEGISLATURE - STATEOFNEWMEXICO- FIRST SESSION, 2019 Pursuant to House Rule 24-1, this document incorporates amendments that have been adopted prior to consideration of this measure by the House.
AN ACT RELATING TO EMPLOYMENT OF EX-CONVICTS;
It is a tool to show the amendments in context and is not to be used for the purpose of amendments.
PROHIBITING PRIVATE EMPLOYERS FROM INQUIRING ABOUT AN APPLICANT'S HISTORY OF ARREST OR CONVICTION ON AN INITIAL EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION;
AN ACT h RELATING TO EMPLOYMENT OF EX-CONVICTS;
PROVIDING A GRIEVANCE PROCESS.
PROHIBITING PRIVATE g o EMPLOYERS FROM INQUIRING ABOUT AN APPLICANT'S HISTORY OF ARREST t hr g e i k OR CONVICTION ON AN INITIAL EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION;
7 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
PROVIDING A h r i s GRIEVANCE PROCESS.
SECTION 1.
h , t, e u g e b l e e h BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
Section 28-2-1 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1974, Chapter 78, Section 1) is amended to read:
n d d i = = o h SECTION 1.
"28-2-1.
Section 28-2-1 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1974, l ] b ,d i a º e Chapter 78, Section 1) is amended to read:
SHORT TITLE.--Chapter 28, Article 2 NMSA 1978 may be cited as the "Criminal Offender Employment Act"." SECTION 2.
r i = r t e w d m a n o "28-2-1.
SHORT TITLE.--[Sections 1 through 6 of this act ] d m :
b e d s º o t n = .214007.1 s k m e e a n e d r e l u [ A d SFl/SJC/SB 96 Chapter 28, Article 2 NMSA 1978 may be cited as the "Criminal Offender Employment Act"." SECTION 2.
"[NEW MATERIAL ] EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION-- PRIVATE EMPLOYERS.-- A.
"EMPLOYMENT ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION--PRIVATE EMPLOYERS.-- A.
Nothing in this section shall prohibit an employer from notifying Sflº the public or»Sfl an applicant that the law or the employer's policy could disqualify an applicant who has a certain criminal history from employment in h particular positions with that employer.
Nothing in this section shall prohibit an employer from notifying the public or an applicant that the law or the employer's policy could disqualify an SFL/SJC/SB 96 applicant who has a certain criminal history from employment Page 1 in particular positions with that employer.
u » r B.
B.
An applicant who claims to be aggrieved by a t h g e violation of Subsection A of this section may seek relief under l i h r i s the Human Rights Act pursuant to the process set out in h , e h Sections 28-1-10 through 28-1-13 NMSA 1978." t u g e b l - 2 - e e , gh n d d i = = o h l ] b ,d i a º r e r = t e w d m a n o d m :
An applicant who claims to be aggrieved by a violation of Subsection A of this section may seek relief under the Human Rights Act pursuant to the process set out in Sections 28-1-10 through 28-1-13 NMSA 1978." SFL/SJC/SB 96 Page 2 7 9 25
b r e t º o t n = .214007.1 s k m e e a n e d r e l u [ A d
View plain text versions (5)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed House

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. DO PASS committee report adopted

  5. Sent to House Labor, Veterans & Military Affairs Committee & House State Government, Elections & Indian Affairs Committee

  6. passed Senate

  7. floor substitute adopted (1 amendment)

  8. floor substitute adopted

  9. DO NOT PASS, replaced with committee substitute

  10. DO PASS committee report adopted

  11. Sent to Senate Public Affairs Committee & Senate Judiciary Committee

  12. Sent to Senate Pre-file

Sponsors

  • Alonzo Baldonado · Primary
  • Bill B. O'Neill · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on · 3 voted No

Sponsors (2)

  • Baldonado, Alonzo
  • O'Neill, Bill B.

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (110)

110 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 110 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

senate passage

Passed 28 Yea · 11 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15801
Republican 3300
Democrat 10002
Total 281103
% of votes cast 67%26%0%7%
How each member voted (42)
Member Party Vote
PAPEN — Yea
CANDELARIA — Yea
RODRIGUEZ — Yea
CISNEROS — Yea
RUE — Yea
SANCHEZ — Yea
GRIGGS — Yea
SEDILLO-LOPEZ — Yea
IVEY-SOTO — Yea
KERNAN — Yea
SMITH — Yea
TALLMAN — Yea
O'NEILL — Yea
WHITE — Yea
PAYNE — Nay
BURT — Nay
PIRTLE — Nay
FULFER — Nay
GOULD — Nay
INGLE — Nay
MOORES — Nay
NEVILLE — Nay
SAPIEN — Not Voting
ORTIZ y PINO — Yea
Antoinette Sedillo Lopez Democrat Yea
Benny Shendo, Jr. Democrat Yea
Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics Democrat Yea
George K. Muñoz Democrat Not Voting
Jeff Steinborn Democrat Yea
Joseph Cervantes Democrat Not Voting
Michael Padilla Democrat Yea
Mimi Stewart Democrat Yea
Pete Campos Democrat Yea
Peter Wirth Democrat Yea
Shannon D. Pinto Democrat Yea
William P. Soules Democrat Yea
Alan T. Martinez Republican Yea
Brian G. Baca Republican Nay
Craig W. Brandt Republican Yea
Gabriel Ramos Republican Yea
Pat Woods Republican Nay
William E. Sharer Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 96?
SB 96 is sponsored by Baldonado, Alonzo and O'Neill, Bill B..
What is the current status of SB 96?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 18, 2018. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 96?
Track SB 96 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 96

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 96

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →