SB 56 — NOTICE TO REMOVE APPRAISER FROM PANEL
Last action — Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 17, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
53 added · 105 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of SB 56 changes the rules for how appraisal management companies (AMCs) can remove independent appraisers from their panels. Now, AMCs must provide written notice to appraisers explaining the reasons for their removal, ensuring transparency and fairness. This change is important because it protects appraisers' rights and allows them a chance to respond to any allegations, which promotes accountability in the appraisal process.
SENATE BILL 56 54TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSIO, 2019 INTRODUCED BY Sander Rue 6 8 10 AN ACT RELATING TO REAL PROPERTY;
156 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
Section 47-14-20 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2009, e t 17 Chapter 214, Section 20) is amended to read:
w l n d 18 "47-14-20.
ADJUDICATION OF DISPUTES BETWEEN AN APPRAISAL = = 19 MANAGEMENT COMPANY AND AN INDEPENDENT APPRAISER.-- a l i a e r 20 A.
[Except within the first thirty days after an a t m m 21 independent appraiser is first added to the appraiser panel of d r e 22 an appraisal management company] An appraisal management c e s k 23 company shall not remove an appraiser from its appraiser panel, e a n b 24 or otherwise refuse to assign requests for real estate u [ appraisal services to an independent appraiser without .211902.1 notifying the appraiser in writing of the reasons for the appraiser being removed from the appraiser panel of the appraisal management company.
An independent appraiser that is removed from the appraiser panel of an appraisal management company for SB 56 Page 1 alleged illegal conduct, violation of the uniform standards of professional appraisal practice or violation of state licensing standards may file a complaint with the board for a review of the decision of the appraisal management company, except that in no case shall the board make any determination regarding the e e 17 nature of the business relationship between the appraiser and e e n d 18 the appraisal management company that is unrelated to the = = l ] 19 actions specified in Subsection A of this section.
a l r i 20 C.
If an independent appraiser files a complaint t e a t against an appraisal management company pursuant to Subsection m m 21 e d r e 22 B of this section, the board shall adjudicate the complaint c e r c 23 within one hundred eighty days.
e a n b 24 D.
If after opportunity for hearing and review, the u [ board determines that an independent appraiser did not commit a .211902.1 - 2 - violation of law, a violation of the uniform standards of professional appraisal practice or a violation of state licensing standards, the board shall order that the appraiser be added to the appraiser panel of the appraisal management company that was the subject of the complaint without prejudice." -SB 356 -Page 92 1125 13 15 e e 17 e e n d 18 = = l ] 19 a l r i 20 t e a t m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .211902.1
View plain text versions (2)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
passed House
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Commerce & Economic Development Committee & House Judiciary Committee
-
passed Senate
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to Senate Corporations and Transportation Committee & Senate Judiciary Committee
-
Sent to Senate Pre-file
Sponsors
- Sander Rue · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Rue, Sander
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 18 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Democrat | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 0% | 0% | 19% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| PAYNE | — | Yea |
| CANDELARIA | — | Yea |
| RODRIGUEZ | — | Yea |
| CISNEROS | — | Yea |
| RUE | — | Yea |
| FULFER | — | Yea |
| SANCHEZ | — | Yea |
| GOULD | — | Yea |
| SAPIEN | — | Yea |
| GRIGGS | — | Yea |
| SEDILLO-LOPEZ | — | Yea |
| IVEY-SOTO | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| NEVILLE | — | Yea |
| TALLMAN | — | Yea |
| O'NEILL | — | Yea |
| WHITE | — | Yea |
| PAPEN | — | Not Voting |
| BURT | — | Not Voting |
| PIRTLE | — | Not Voting |
| INGLE | — | Not Voting |
| KERNAN | — | Not Voting |
| MOORES | — | Not Voting |
| ORTIZ y PINO | — | Yea |
| Antoinette Sedillo Lopez | Democrat | Yea |
| Benny Shendo, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics | Democrat | Yea |
| George K. Muñoz | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Jeff Steinborn | Democrat | Yea |
| Joseph Cervantes | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Padilla | Democrat | Yea |
| Mimi Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Pete Campos | Democrat | Yea |
| Peter Wirth | Democrat | Yea |
| Shannon D. Pinto | Democrat | Yea |
| William P. Soules | Democrat | Yea |
| Alan T. Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Brian G. Baca | Republican | Yea |
| Craig W. Brandt | Republican | Yea |
| Gabriel Ramos | Republican | Yea |
| Pat Woods | Republican | Not Voting |
| William E. Sharer | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 56?
- SB 56 is sponsored by Rue, Sander.
- What is the current status of SB 56?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 17, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 56?
- Track SB 56 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 56
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 56
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →