TRADITIONAL HISTORIC COMMUNITY QUALIFICATIONS
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 74 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 74.
You're tracking HB 74
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 74 — TRADITIONAL HISTORIC COMMUNITY QUALIFICATIONS
Last action — Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 17, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (4 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
82 added · 164 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill HB 74 clarify the definition of "urbanized territory" and emphasize protection for traditional historic communities. Specifically, it ensures that areas designated as traditional historic communities cannot be annexed by nearby municipalities without the consent of a majority of their registered voters. This change is significant because it gives more control to smaller communities over their governance and preserves their historical identity within the larger urban landscape.
HOUSE BILL 74 TH LEGISLATURE - STATEOFNEWMEXICO- FIRST SESSION, 2019 INTRODUCED BY Roberto “Bobby” J.
Gonzales and Andrea Romero Pursuant to House Rule 24-1, this document incorporates amendments that have been adopted prior to consideration of this measure by the House.
It is a tool to show the amendments in context and is not to be used for the purpose of amendments.
REVISING h QUALIFICATIONS.
g5 o t hr g e i k BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
h r i s SECTION 1.
Section 3-2-3 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1965, h , t, Chapter 300, Section 14-2-3, as amended) is amended to read:
e u g e b l e e h "3-2-3.
URBANIZED TERRITORY--INCORPORATION LIMITED WITHIN n d d i = = o h URBANIZED TERRITORY.-- l ] b ,d i a º e A.
Urbanized territory is that territory within the rsame icounty =and rwithin tfive emiles wof dthe mboundary of any municipality having a npopulation oof five thousand or more persons and that territory within the same county and within fivethree miles of a municipality having a population of less than five thousand persons, except that territory in a county declared by an ordinance of the boundaryboard of anycounty dcommissioners mto :be a traditional historic community shall not be considered urbanized territory and shall not be annexed by a municipality unless it is considered for annexation pursuant to a petition requesting annexation signed by a majority of the registered voters within the traditional historic community.
b e d s º o t n = .211045.1 s k m e e a n e d r e l u [ A d municipality having a population of five thousand or more persons and that territory within the same county and within three miles of a municipality having a population of less than five thousand persons, except that territory in a [class B ] county [with a population between ninety-five thousand and ninety-nine thousand five hundred, based on the 1990 federal decennial census] declared by an ordinance of the board of county commissioners to be a traditional historic community shall not be considered urbanized territory and shall not be annexed by a municipality unless it is considered for annexation pursuant to a petition requesting annexation signed by a majority of the registered HJCº qualified electors»HJC HJCºvoters»HJC within the traditional historic community.
(1) municipality or municipalities causing theHB h74/a Page 1 the urbanized territory approve, by resolution, the incorporation u » r of the territory as a municipality;
t h g e l i (2) residents of the territory proposed to be h r i s incorporated have filed with the municipality a valid petition h , e h to annex the territory proposed to be incorporated and the t u g e b l e e , gh municipality fails, within one hundred twenty days after the n d d i = = o h filing of the annexation petition, to annex the territory l ] b ,d i a º r proposed to be incorporated;
or e(3) rresidents =of tthe eterritory wproposed dto mbe aannexed nconclusively oprove (3)that residentsthe ofmunicipality is unable to provide municipal services within the territory proposed to be dincorporated mwithin :the same period of time that the proposed municipality could provide municipal service.
b r e t º o t n = .211045.1 s k m e - 2 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d annexed conclusively prove that the municipality is unable to provide municipal services within the territory proposed to be incorporated within the same period of time that the proposed municipality could provide municipal service.
hHB 74/a Page 2 (1) be an unincorporated area of a [classcounty; B ] u » r county [with a population between ninety-five thousand and t h g e l i ninety-nine thousand five hundred, based on the 1990 federal h r i s decennial census];
h , e h (2) be an identifiable village, community, t u g e b l e e , gh neighborhood or district that can be documented as having n d d i = = o h existed for more than one hundred years;
l ] b ,d i a º r (3) include structures or landmarks that are e r = t e w d m a n o associated with the identity of the specific village, dcommunity, mneighborhood :or district seeking designation as a traditional historic community;
b r e t º o t n = .211045.1 s k m e - 3 - e a n e d r e l u [ A d community, neighborhood or district seeking designation as a traditional historic community;
A traditional historic community may be annexed by a municipality only by petition of a majority of the registered HJCºvoters qualified electors»HJC HJCºvoters»HJC of the territory within the traditional historic community proposed to be annexed by the municipality or by the arbitration method of annexation only upon petition of a majority of the registered qualified electors of the territory within the traditional h historic community." u » r SECTION 3.
EFFECTIVE DATE.--The effective date of the t h g e l i provisions of this act is July 1, 2019.
hHB r74/a iPage s3 -25 4 - h , e h t u g e b l e e , gh n d d i = = o h l ] b ,d i a º r e r = t e w d m a n o d m :
b r e t º o t n = .211045.1 s k m e e a n e d r e l u [ A d
View plain text versions (3)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Amended Amendments in Context pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
passed Senate
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to Senate Judiciary Committee
-
passed House
-
DO PASS, as amended, committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Judiciary Committee
-
Sent to House Pre-file
Sponsors
- Susan K. Herrera · Primary
- Raymundo Lara · Primary
- Andrea Romero · Primary
- Anita Gonzales · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 108 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Susan K. Herrera Democrat
- Raymundo Lara Democrat
- Andrea Romero Democrat
- Anita Gonzales Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (108)
108 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 108 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 74?
- HB 74 is sponsored by Susan K. Herrera (Democrat), Raymundo Lara (Democrat), Andrea Romero (Democrat), and Anita Gonzales (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 74?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 17, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 74?
- Track HB 74 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 74
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 74
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →