New Mexico 2019 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

SM 39 — COLLABORATION FOR EXCELLENT CARE

Last action — Signed

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2019. Enacted.

Prognosis

Advancing 52% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

76 added · 105 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of the bill SM 39 includes additional lines that emphasize the need for regional collaboration in providing mental and physical health services. This change highlights the ongoing healthcare access issues faced by New Mexico, particularly in rural areas where many residents live without adequate medical support. By stressing the importance of working together at a regional level, the bill aims to ensure that healthcare services meet the diverse needs of the state's population and address provider shortages. This matters because it can lead to more effective health outcomes for New Mexicans in underserved areas.

→
Previous
Latest
SENATE MEMORIAL 39 54TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2019 INTRODUCED BY Pete Campos 6 8 10 A MEMORIAL ENCOURAGING REGIONAL COLLABORATION FOR PROVIDING EXCEPTIONAL MENTAL AND PHYSICAL HEALTH SERVICES AT ALL LEVELS OF CARE.
A MEMORIAL ENCOURAGING REGIONAL COLLABORATION FOR PROVIDING EXCEPTIONAL MENTAL AND PHYSICAL HEALTH SERVICES AT ALL LEVELS OF CARE.
14 WHEREAS, New Mexico faces significant challenges in access to health care due to its large rural and frontier areas, with thirty-four percent of the state's two million one hundred e t 17 thousand residents living in rural or frontier counties;
5 WHEREAS, New Mexico faces significant challenges in access to health care due to its large rural and frontier areas, with thirty-four percent of the state's two million one hundred thousand residents living in rural or frontier counties;
and w l n d 18 WHEREAS, New Mexico's geographically sparse and aging = = 19 a l population puts pressure on its health care system, and the i a e r 20 racial and ethnic diversity of the state compared to the United a t m m 21 States poses challenges in providing culturally sensitive d r e 22 health care;
and WHEREAS, New Mexico's geographically sparse and aging population puts pressure on its health care system, and the racial and ethnic diversity of the state compared to the United States poses challenges in providing culturally sensitive health care;
and c e s k 23 WHEREAS, there is limited access to health care in New e a n b 24 Mexico, which is related to primary care provider shortages and u [ lack of awareness of insurance availability, according to The .212798.1 State of Health in New Mexico 2018, issued by the department of health in April 2018;
and WHEREAS, there is limited access to health care in New Mexico, which is related to primary care provider shortages and lack of awareness of insurance availability, according to The State of Health in New Mexico 2018, issued by the department of health in April 2018;
A.
SM 39 A.
coordination of rural health care services, school-based health clinics and private and public sector hospitals;
coordination of rural health care services, Page 1 school-based health clinics and private and public sector hospitals;
e e 17 D.
D.
transportation needs of patients in rural areas e e n d 18 to access health care;
transportation needs of patients in rural areas to access health care;
= = l ] 19 E.
E.
the feasibility of telemedicine and educational a l r i 20 outreach for the more rural health care facilities;
the feasibility of telemedicine and educational outreach for the more rural health care facilities;
and t e a t F.
and F.
other related and important components of health m m 21 e d r e 22 care delivery to improve the quality of care, effectiveness, c e r c 23 confidence in medical services and minimization of duplication e a n b 24 of efforts;
other related and important components of health care delivery to improve the quality of care, effectiveness, confidence in medical services and minimization of duplication of efforts;
and u [ WHEREAS, faced with the challenges of a shortage of .212798.1 - 2 - doctors, nurses and other health care providers, it is important that the department of health and state health providers continue to communicate with each other to ensure proactive preventive health care to keep the populations in communities of all sizes as healthy as possible;
and WHEREAS, faced with the challenges of a shortage of doctors, nurses and other health care providers, it is important that the department of health and state health providers continue to communicate with each other to ensure proactive preventive health care to keep the populations in communities of all sizes as healthy as possible;
and WHEREAS, increased cooperation among health care providers will provide the ability to serve patients at all levels of needed care, from preventive to terminal, with a goal of providing quality health care at every level;
and WHEREAS, increased cooperation among health care providers will provide the ability to serve patients at all levels of needed care, from preventive to terminal, with a SM 39 Page 2 goal of providing quality health care at every level;
e e 17 - 3 - e e n d 18 = = l ] 19 a l r i 20 t e a t m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .212798.1
SM 39 Page 3 25
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed Senate

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. DO PASS committee report adopted

  5. Sent to Senate Rules Committee & Senate Public Affairs Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (111)

111 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 111 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SM 39?
SM 39 is sponsored by Pete Campos (Democrat).
What is the current status of SM 39?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2019. Enacted.
Where can I track SM 39?
Track SM 39 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SM 39

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SM 39

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →