HM 86 — NAFTA IMPORTANCE & MODERNIZATION
Last action — Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
93 added · 135 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of House Memorial 86 includes additional lines that highlight the significant economic impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) on New Mexico and its neighboring states. It emphasizes the growth of exports and trade among the U.S., Canada, and Mexico since the agreement was enacted. This change is important because it reinforces the need for the U.S. government to protect and continue supporting NAFTA while updating it, ensuring economic stability and ongoing investment for New Mexico and the border states.
HOUSEA MEMORIAL 86RECOGNIZING 53RDTHE LEGISLATUREIMPORTANCE -OF STATETHE OFNORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT TO NEW MEXICOMEXICO'S -ECONOMY, SECONDTO SESSIONOTHER ,STATES 2018ON INTRODUCEDTHE BYBORDER NathanWITH P.MEXICO AND TO THE GENERAL AMERICAN ECONOMY;
SmallREQUESTING andTHAT LarryTHE R.UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT COMMIT TO PROTECTING THE CURRENT AND ONGOING INVESTMENT THAT IS PREDICATED ON THE AGREEMENT AS IT NEGOTIATES WITH MEXICO AND CANADA TO MODERNIZE THE AGREEMENT.
ScottWHEREAS, 6for 8over 10two Adecades, MEMORIALthe RECOGNIZINGNorth THEAmerican IMPORTANCEFree OFTrade THEAgreement, NORTHcommonly AMERICANreferred FREEto TRADEas AGREEMENTNAFTA, TOhas NEWstrengthened MEXICO'Sthe ECONOMY,economic, TOcultural OTHERand STATESstrategic ONbonds THEbetween BORDERthe WITHUnited MEXICOStates ANDof TOAmerica, THEMexico GENERALand AMERICANCanada; ECONOMY;
REQUESTINGand THATWHEREAS, THEin UNITEDa STATESreview GOVERNMENTof COMMITthe TONorth PROTECTINGAmerican THEFree CURRENTTrade ANDAgreement, ONGOINGthe INVESTMENTinternational THATtrade ISadministration PREDICATEDof ONthe THEUnited AGREEMENTStates ASdepartment ITof NEGOTIATEScommerce WITHreported MEXICOthat ANDAmerican eexports tto 17Canada CANADAand TOMexico MODERNIZEhad THEgrown AGREEMENT.by nearly four hundred thirty billion dollars ($430,000,000,000) during the agreement's first twenty years;
w l n d 18 = = 19 a l WHEREAS, for over two decades, the North American Free i a e r 20 Trade Agreement, commonly referred to as NAFTA, has a t m m 21 strengthened the economic, cultural and strategic bonds between d r e 22 the United States of America, Mexico and Canada;
and c e s k 23 WHEREAS, in a review of the North American Free Trade e a n b 24 Agreement, the international trade administration of the United u [ States department of commerce reported that American exports to .210004.2 Canada and Mexico had grown by nearly four hundred thirty billion dollars ($430,000,000,000) during the agreement's first twenty years;
and WHEREAS, in January 2018, global affairs Canada reported that annual New Mexico exports of goodgoods and services to HM 86 Canada total three hundred thirty-nine million dollars Page 1 ($339,000,000) and that Canadian travelers spend twenty-nine million dollars ($29,000,000) in New Mexico annually;
and WHEREAS, in 2016, the border industrial association reported that since 2007, all four of the border states have experienced strong growth in their international exports to Mexico;
and WHEREAS, respectively, California has experienced forty- e e 17 six percent growth, Texas has experienced sixty-five percent e e n d 18 growth, Arizona has experienced seventy-five percent growth and = = l ] 19 New Mexico has experienced three hundred fifty percent growth;
a l r i 20 and t e a t WHEREAS, forty-five percent of New Mexico's current m m 21 e d r e 22 international export trade is with Mexico and, of the ten c e r c 23 thousand four hundred jobs in New Mexico that are directly tied e a n b 24 to the North American Free Trade Agreement, most are tied to u [ trade with Mexico;
and .210004.2 - 2 - WHEREAS, vast international logistics routes have been developed to take advantage of the consumer and labor markets created by the North American Free Trade Agreement;
and HM 86 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Union Pacific transmodal shipping center is the linchpin for the Sunset limited shipping route serving HM 86 communities through its eastern branches from New Orleans, Page 3 Louisiana, and Houston, Texas, to Long Beach, California, at its western terminus;
and WHEREAS, significant public and private business investment is ongoing in a number of locations in New Mexico to e e 17 develop warehousing, manufacturing and distribution facilities e e n d 18 to leverage the potential of the logistics routes created by = = l ] 19 the North American Free Trade Agreement;
and a l r i 20 WHEREAS, the existing and growing business sector tied to t e a t the North American Free Trade Agreement is a critical element m m 21 e d r e 22 in the diversification of New Mexico's job market;
c e r c 23 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF e a n b 24 REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the United u [ States government be requested to commit to continuing .210004.2 - 3 - negotiations until a modernized North American Free Trade Agreement is completed that does not undercut existing investment or disrupt the ongoing investment in infrastructure and promotes the full potential for economic growth of the partners to the agreement;
-HM 486 -Page 144 165 e7 e9 1725 e e n d 18 = = l ] 19 a l r i 20 t e a t m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .210004.2
View plain text versions (2)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
passed House
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Labor and Economic Development Committee
Sponsors
- Larry R. Scott · Primary
- Nathan P. Small · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Scott, Larry R.
- Nathan P. Small Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (110)
110 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 110 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democrat | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 65 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (70)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Garcma, M.P. | — | Yea |
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Salazar, Nick | — | Yea |
| Salazar, Tomás | — | Yea |
| Gonzales | — | Yea |
| Maestas Barnes | — | Yea |
| Garcia Richard | — | Yea |
| Martmnez, Javier | — | Yea |
| Rehm | — | Not Voting |
| Adkins | — | Yea |
| Alcon | — | Yea |
| Baldonado | — | Yea |
| Bandy | — | Not Voting |
| Chasey | — | Yea |
| Clahchischilliage | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Crowder | — | Yea |
| Dines | — | Yea |
| Dodge | — | Not Voting |
| Egolf | — | Yea |
| Ely | — | Yea |
| Fajardo | — | Yea |
| Gentry | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Herrell | — | Yea |
| Larrañaga | — | Yea |
| Lewis | — | Yea |
| Louis | — | Yea |
| McCamley | — | Yea |
| Nibert | — | Yea |
| Powdrell-Culbert | — | Yea |
| Roch | — | Yea |
| Rodella | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Ruiloba | — | Yea |
| Stapleton | — | Yea |
| Strickler | — | Yea |
| Sweetser | — | Yea |
| Wooley | — | Yea |
| Youngblood | — | Not Voting |
| Angelica Rubio | Democrat | Yea |
| Antonio Maestas | Democrat | Yea |
| Charlotte Little | Democrat | Yea |
| D. Wonda Johnson | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra M. Sariñana | Democrat | Yea |
| Derrick J. Lente | Democrat | Yea |
| Doreen Y. Gallegos | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth "Liz" Thomson | Democrat | Yea |
| Joanne J. Ferrary | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Martha Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Matthew McQueen | Democrat | Yea |
| Nathan P. Small | Democrat | Yea |
| Patricia A. Lundstrom | Democrat | Yea |
| Patricia Roybal Caballero | Democrat | Yea |
| Alan T. Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Candy Spence Ezzell | Republican | Yea |
| Cathrynn N. Brown | Republican | Yea |
| David M. Gallegos | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gail Armstrong | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Armstrong | Republican | Yea |
| James G. Townsend | Republican | Yea |
| Larry R. Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Rebecca Dow | Republican | Yea |
| Rod Montoya | Republican | Yea |
| William A. Hall II | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HM 86?
- HM 86 is sponsored by Scott, Larry R. and Nathan P. Small (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HM 86?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track HM 86?
- Track HM 86 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HM 86
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HM 86
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →