REDUCE SCHOOL FOOD WASTE
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SM 60 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SM 60.
You're tracking SM 60
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SM 60 — REDUCE SCHOOL FOOD WASTE
Last action — Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
50 added · 70 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill SM 60 adds a more detailed request for the Legislative Education Study Committee and the Legislative Health and Human Services Committee to examine existing programs aimed at reducing food waste in school food programs. It emphasizes the importance of ensuring that unused or uneaten food is redirected to benefit hungry children, especially given that New Mexico has a high rate of childhood poverty and hunger. This matters because it seeks to address food waste while simultaneously helping those in need, potentially improving food security for vulnerable students.
SENATEA MEMORIAL 60REQUESTING 53RDTHE LEGISLATURELEGISLATIVE -EDUCATION STATESTUDY OFCOMMITTEE NEWAND MEXICOTHE -LEGISLATIVE SECONDHEALTH SESSION,AND 2018HUMAN INTRODUCEDSERVICES BYCOMMITTEE GayTO G.REVIEW EXISTING PROGRAMS TO REDUCE FOOD WASTE IN SCHOOL FOOD PROGRAMS AND TO STUDY WAYS TO CREATE AND EXPAND POLICIES THAT ALLOW UNUSED OR UNEATEN FOOD TO GO TO THE BENEFIT OF HUNGRY CHILDREN.
Kernan9 6WHEREAS, 8New 10Mexico Aconsistently MEMORIALranks REQUESTINGin THEthe LEGISLATIVEtop EDUCATIONfive STUDYstates COMMITTEEnationally ANDfor THEthe LEGISLATIVEnumber HEALTHof ANDchildren HUMANliving SERVICESin COMMITTEEpoverty TOand REVIEWexperiencing EXISTINGhunger; PROGRAMS TO REDUCE FOOD WASTE IN SCHOOL FOOD PROGRAMS AND TO STUDY WAYS TO CREATE AND EXPAND POLICIES THAT ALLOW UNUSED OR UNEATEN FOOD TO GO TO THE BENEFIT OF HUNGRY CHILDREN.
eand t 17 WHEREAS, Newschool Mexicofood consistentlyprograms ranksare inan theimportant toptool fivein w l n d 18 states nationally for the numberfight ofagainst childrenchildhood living in poverty = = 19 a l and experiencing hunger;
and i a e r 20 WHEREAS, schoolsome existing food programspolicy areregulations anresult important tool in thefood agoing tto mwaste mrather 21than fightgoing againstto childhoodfeed hunger;hungry children;
and dWHEREAS, rUnited eStates 22department WHEREAS,of someagriculture existingregulations foodallow policyfor regulationsthe resultdonation inof cunused efood sto kspecific 23 food goingprograms tobut wastelimit ratherdistribution thanoutlets goingfor tosmaller, feedrural hungrycommunities; children;
e a n b 24 and uWHEREAS, [school WHEREAS,food Unitedprogram Statespersonnel departmenthave ofindicated agriculturea .209816.1desire regulationsto allowbe forable theto donationprovide ofmore unused food to specifichungry foodchildren; programs but limit distribution outlets for smaller, rural communities;
andNOW, WHEREAS,THEREFORE, schoolBE foodIT programRESOLVED personnelBY haveTHE indicatedSENATE aOF desireTHE SM 60 STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the importance of maximizing all Page 1 available resources to bereduce ableschool food waste and to provide more unused food directly to hungry 6children children;be affirmed;
NOW,and THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BYthat THEthe SENATElegislative OFeducation THEstudy STATEcommittee OFand NEWthe MEXICOlegislative thathealth theand importancehuman ofservices maximizingcommittee allbe availablerequested resourcesto review existing programs to reduce food waste in school food wasteprograms and to providestudy moreways to create and expand policies that allow unused or uneaten food directlyto go to hungrythe childrenbenefit beof affirmed;hungry children;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that thecopies legislativeof educationthis 12memorial study committee and the legislative health and human services committee be requestedtransmitted to reviewthe existingchairs programsof tothe reducelegislative foodeducation wastestudy incommittee school food programs and tothe studylegislative wayshealth to create and expandhuman policiesservices thatcommittee. allow unused or uneaten food to go to the benefit of hungry children;
andSM e60 ePage 172 BE25 IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be e e n d 18 transmitted to the chairs of the legislative education study = = l ] 19 committee and the legislative health and human services a l r i 20 committee.
t e a t - 2 - m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .209816.1
View plain text versions (2)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
passed Senate
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
withdrawn from committee
-
Sent to Senate Rules Committee & Senate Education Committee
Sponsors
- Gay G. Kernan · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Kernan, Gay G.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democrat | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| CANDELARIA | — | Yea |
| McSORLEY | — | Yea |
| BURT | — | Yea |
| PAPEN | — | Yea |
| KERNAN | — | Yea |
| INGLE | — | Yea |
| SAPIEN | — | Yea |
| O'NEILL | — | Yea |
| GOULD | — | Yea |
| RUE | — | Yea |
| PIRTLE | — | Yea |
| MOORES | — | Yea |
| WHITE | — | Yea |
| PAYNE | — | Yea |
| LEAVELL | — | Yea |
| NEVILLE | — | Yea |
| GRIGGS | — | Yea |
| SANCHEZ | — | Yea |
| CISNEROS | — | Yea |
| RODRIGUEZ | — | Yea |
| MORALES | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Not Voting |
| IVEY-SOTO | — | Not Voting |
| TALLMAN | — | Not Voting |
| ORTIZ y PINO | — | Not Voting |
| Antoinette Sedillo Lopez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Benny Shendo, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics | Democrat | Yea |
| George K. Muñoz | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Jeff Steinborn | Democrat | Yea |
| Joseph Cervantes | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Padilla | Democrat | Yea |
| Mimi Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Pete Campos | Democrat | Yea |
| Peter Wirth | Democrat | Yea |
| Shannon D. Pinto | Democrat | Yea |
| William P. Soules | Democrat | Yea |
| Alan T. Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Brian G. Baca | Republican | Not Voting |
| Craig W. Brandt | Republican | Yea |
| Pat Woods | Republican | Yea |
| William E. Sharer | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SM 60?
- SM 60 is sponsored by Kernan, Gay G..
- What is the current status of SM 60?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track SM 60?
- Track SM 60 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SM 60
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SM 60
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →