New Mexico 2018 Regular Session Status: Enacted 2 D cosponsors

HM 83 — INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT STUDY & REPORT

Last action — Signed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2018. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 76% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    3 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

104 added · 148 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent changes to Bill HM 83 include the addition of specific requests for the New Mexico Tribal Indian Child Welfare Consortium to conduct a study and provide recommendations on compliance with the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978. This amendment emphasizes the ongoing issue of the high number of Indian children in the state's welfare system, almost 40 years after the act was established to protect their rights and well-being. These changes matter because they aim to ensure that the unique needs of Native American families are addressed and that the state takes action to improve child welfare outcomes for these communities.

→
Previous
Latest
HOUSE MEMORIAL 83 53RD LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - SECOND SESSION, 2018 INTRODUCED BY Derrick J.
A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THAT THE NEW MEXICO TRIBAL INDIAN CHILD WELFARE CONSORTIUM, IN COLLABORATION WITH OTHER CHILD WELFARE ENTITIES, CONDUCT A STUDY, COMPLETE A REPORT AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT OF 1978 BASED ON THE REPORT'S FINDINGS.
Lente and Georgene Louis and D.
8 WHEREAS, the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 was passed in response to the wholesale removal of Indian children from their families;
Wonda Johnson 6 8 10 A MEMORIAL REQUESTING THAT THE NEW MEXICO TRIBAL INDIAN CHILD WELFARE CONSORTIUM, IN COLLABORATION WITH OTHER CHILD WELFARE ENTITIES, CONDUCT A STUDY, COMPLETE A REPORT AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT OF 1978 BASED ON THE REPORT'S FINDINGS.
and WHEREAS, the United States congress recognized the importance of protecting the rights of Indian children and tribes to protect the best interests of Indian children and to promote the stability of Indian tribes and families;
e t 17 WHEREAS, the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 was w l n d 18 passed in response to the wholesale removal of Indian children = = 19 a l from their families;
and WHEREAS, each Indian pueblo, tribe and nation in New Mexico is a sovereign, self-governing entity with a unique government, judicial structure and language and unique customs and traditions;
and i a e r 20 WHEREAS, the United States congress recognized the a t m m 21 importance of protecting the rights of Indian children and d r e 22 tribes to protect the best interests of Indian children and to c e s k 23 promote the stability of Indian tribes and families;
and e a n b 24 WHEREAS, each Indian pueblo, tribe and nation in New u [ Mexico is a sovereign, self-governing entity with a unique .209894.1 government, judicial structure and language and unique customs and traditions;
6 and WHEREAS, while that act was intended to end abusive practices and improve outcomes for Native American families, Native American children are still disproportionately entering foster care, and placement may be outside of their respective Indian families, extended families and tribes;
and WHEREAS, while that act was intended to end abusive practices and improve outcomes for Native American families, HM 83 Native American children are still disproportionately Page 1 entering foster care, and placement may be outside of their respective Indian families, extended families and tribes;
and 12 WHEREAS, there is no definitive data to improve compliance with the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, Native American children are still overrepresented in foster care and the percentage of Native American children in foster care is more than twice as high as the percentage of non-Native American e e 17 children;
and WHEREAS, there is no definitive data to improve compliance with the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, Native American children are still overrepresented in foster care and the percentage of Native American children in foster care is more than twice as high as the percentage of non-Native American children;
and e e n d 18 WHEREAS, it is well established that when dealing with = = l ] 19 Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 cases, it is difficult to a l r i 20 generalize about Native American cultural traditions or t e a t customs, and it is imperative that tribal entities be included m m 21 e d in the process of making recommendations on how to best comply r e 22 c e r c 23 with that act;
and WHEREAS, it is well established that when dealing with Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 cases, it is difficult to generalize about Native American cultural traditions or customs, and it is imperative that tribal entities be included in the process of making recommendations on how to best comply with that act;
and e a n b 24 WHEREAS, appropriately addressing the needs of Indian u [ children who came into the state's child welfare system because .209894.1 - 2 - of abuse and neglect has been a priority of New Mexico state and tribal courts, the national Indian child welfare association, the Corinne Wolfe children's law center at the university of New Mexico, New Mexico highlands university, the New Mexico supreme court's court improvement project, the 6 tribal-state judicial consortium and the New Mexico tribal Indian child welfare consortium;
and WHEREAS, appropriately addressing the needs of Indian children who came into the state's child welfare system because of abuse and neglect has been a priority of New Mexico state and tribal courts, the national Indian child welfare association, the Corinne Wolfe children's law center at the university of New Mexico, New Mexico highlands university, the New Mexico supreme court's court improvement project, the tribal-state judicial consortium and the New Mexico tribal Indian child welfare consortium;
and WHEREAS, the Children's Code specifically supports the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 and serves to mandate compliance;
and WHEREAS, the Children's Code specifically supports the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 and serves to HM 83 Page 2 mandate compliance;
and WHEREAS, though these provisions exist in the Children's 12 Code, the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 is not applied consistently throughout the state;
and WHEREAS, though these provisions exist in the Children's Code, the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 is not applied consistently throughout the state;
and e e 17 WHEREAS, the president, vice president of academic e e n d 18 affairs, provost and dean of the school of social work at New = = l ] 19 Mexico highlands university have committed to collaborate with a l r i 20 the all pueblo council of governors and New Mexico's Indian t e a t pueblos, tribes and nations to develop and establish a Native m m 21 e d American social workers' institute at the New Mexico highlands r e 22 c e r c 23 university school of social work to respond to the growing e a n b 24 challenges to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 statewide;
and WHEREAS, the president, vice president of academic affairs, provost and dean of the school of social work at New Mexico highlands university have committed to collaborate with the all pueblo council of governors and New Mexico's Indian pueblos, tribes and nations to develop and establish a Native American social workers' institute at the New Mexico highlands university school of social work to respond to the growing challenges to the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 statewide;
u [ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF .209894.1 - 3 - REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the New Mexico tribal Indian child welfare consortium, in collaboration with child welfare entities, including the tribal-state judicial consortium, New Mexico partners, the national Indian child welfare association, the Corinne Wolfe children's law center 6 and New Mexico highlands university, be requested to conduct a study, complete a report and make recommendations regarding compliance with the federal Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 based on the report's findings regarding that act;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the New Mexico tribal Indian child welfare consortium, in collaboration with child welfare entities, including the tribal-state judicial consortium, New Mexico partners, the national Indian child welfare association, the Corinne Wolfe children's law center and New Mexico highlands university, be requested to conduct a study, complete a report and make recommendations regarding compliance with the federal Indian HM 83 Page 3 Child Welfare Act of 1978 based on the report's findings regarding that act;
and 12 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be transmitted to the co-chairs of the New Mexico legislative council, the interim legislative committee dealing with Indian affairs, the New Mexico tribal Indian child welfare consortium, the tribal-state judicial consortium, New Mexico partners, the e e 17 national Indian child welfare association, the Corinne Wolfe e e n d 18 children's law center and New Mexico highlands university.
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be transmitted to the co-chairs of the New Mexico legislative council, the interim legislative committee dealing with Indian affairs, the New Mexico tribal Indian child welfare consortium, the tribal-state judicial consortium, New Mexico partners, the national Indian child welfare association, the Corinne Wolfe children's law center and New Mexico highlands university.
= = l ] 19 - 4 - a l r i 20 t e a t m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .209894.1
HM 83 Page 4 25
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Signed

  2. passed House

  3. DO PASS committee report adopted

  4. Sent to House State Government, Indian and Veterans' Affairs Committee

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 109 not signed on

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (109)

109 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 109 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

house passage

Passed 66 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 37004
Democrat 18000
Republican 11000
Total 66004
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (70)
Member Party Vote
Garcma, M.P. — Yea
Salazar, Nick — Yea
Salazar, Tomás — Yea
Maestas Barnes — Yea
Martmnez, Javier — Yea
Rehm — Yea
Gonzales — Not Voting
Garcia Richard — Not Voting
Smith — Not Voting
Adkins — Yea
Alcon — Yea
Baldonado — Yea
Bandy — Yea
Chasey — Yea
Clahchischilliage — Yea
Cook — Yea
Crowder — Yea
Dines — Yea
Dodge — Yea
Egolf — Yea
Ely — Yea
Fajardo — Yea
Gentry — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Harper — Yea
Herrell — Yea
Larrañaga — Yea
Lewis — Yea
Louis — Yea
McCamley — Not Voting
Nibert — Yea
Powdrell-Culbert — Yea
Roch — Yea
Rodella — Yea
Romero — Yea
Ruiloba — Yea
Stapleton — Yea
Strickler — Yea
Sweetser — Yea
Wooley — Yea
Youngblood — Yea
Angelica Rubio Democrat Yea
Antonio Maestas Democrat Yea
Charlotte Little Democrat Yea
D. Wonda Johnson Democrat Yea
Debra M. Sariñana Democrat Yea
Derrick J. Lente Democrat Yea
Doreen Y. Gallegos Democrat Yea
Elizabeth "Liz" Thomson Democrat Yea
Joanne J. Ferrary Democrat Yea
Linda M. Trujillo Democrat Yea
Linda M. Trujillo Democrat Yea
Linda M. Trujillo Democrat Yea
Linda M. Trujillo Democrat Yea
Martha Garcia Democrat Yea
Matthew McQueen Democrat Yea
Nathan P. Small Democrat Yea
Patricia A. Lundstrom Democrat Yea
Patricia Roybal Caballero Democrat Yea
Alan T. Martinez Republican Yea
Candy Spence Ezzell Republican Yea
Cathrynn N. Brown Republican Yea
David M. Gallegos Republican Yea
Gail Armstrong Republican Yea
Gail Armstrong Republican Yea
James G. Townsend Republican Yea
Larry R. Scott Republican Yea
Rebecca Dow Republican Yea
Rod Montoya Republican Yea
William A. Hall II Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HM 83?
HM 83 is sponsored by Louis, Georgene, D. Wonda Johnson (Democrat), and Derrick J. Lente (Democrat).
What is the current status of HM 83?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2018. Enacted.
Where can I track HM 83?
Track HM 83 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HM 83

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HM 83

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →