PECAN BUYERS LICENSURE ACT
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 217 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 217.
You're tracking SB 217
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 217 — PECAN BUYERS LICENSURE ACT
Last action — Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 29, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
160 added · 292 removedPlain-language change summary
The recently amended bill SB 217 introduces a new licensing system for buyers of in-shell pecans in New Mexico. It creates specific definitions for various roles in the pecan purchasing process and outlines the responsibilities of the New Mexico Department of Agriculture and peace officers. Notably, while the original bill proposed criminal penalties for pecan theft, the new version focuses on licensing regulations and penalties solely for violations of the licensing act. This change is significant because it aims to regulate the pecan-buying industry more effectively while streamlining enforcement measures.
SENATEAN BILLACT 217RELATING 53RDTO LEGISLATUREAGRICULTURE; - STATEOFNEWMEXICO- SECOND SESSION , 2018 INTRODUCED BY Cliff R.
Pirtle and George K.
Munoz 6 8 10 AN ACT RELATING TO AGRICULTURE;
PROVIDING POWERS AND DUTIES TO THE NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 14 PEACE OFFICERS AND IN-SHELL PECAN BUYERS;
ENACTING CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE PECAN BUYERS LICENSURE ACTACT. AND FOR LARCENY OF PECANS.
e9 t 17 w l n d 18 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
= = 19 SECTION 1.
[NEW MATERIAL ] SHORT TITLE.--SectionsTITLE.--This 1 a l i a e r 20 through 8 of this act may be cited as the "Pecan Buyers a t m m 21 Licensure Act".
d r e 22 SECTION 2.
[NEW MATERIAL] DEFINITIONS.--As used in the c e s k 23 Pecan Buyers Licensure Act:
e a n b 24 A.
"buyer" means a person engaged in the business u [ of purchasing in-shell pecans,pecans includingfrom a pecan producer and includes an accumulator, buying .210050.1 station, cleaning plant, sheller, dealer or broker;
SB 217 D.
"director" means the director of the New Mexico Page 1 department of agriculture;
"peace officer" means a full-time salaried and e e 17 commissioned or certified law enforcement officer of a police e e n d 18 or sheriff's department that is part of or administered by the = = l ] 19 state or a political subdivision of the state;
and a l r i 20 H.
"pecan producer" means a person who grows pecans;
and I.
t e a t (1) a driver's license;
m m 21 e d r e 22 (2) a military identification card;
or c e r c 23 (3) a passport issued by the United States or e a n b 24 by another country and recognized by the United States.
u [ SECTION 3.
[NEW MATERIAL ] NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF .210050.1 - 2 - AGRICULTURE--PEACE OFFICER--POWERS AND DUTIES--RULEMAKING.-- A.
and (3) collect a reasonable annual licensure SB 217 Page 2 fee, established in rule, but not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500).
The department or a peace officer may:may inspect buying locations and documents related to the buying and selling of in-shell pecans to determine compliance with the Pecan Buyers Licensure Act or adopted rules.
(1)SECTION inspect4. buying locations and documents related to the buying and selling of in-shell pecans to determine compliance with the Pecan Buyers Licensure Act or adopted rules;
andBUYER'S (2)LICENSE seizeREQUIREMENT--APPLICATION.-- in-shellA. pecans determined to have been bought or sold in violation of the Pecan Buyers Licensure e e 17 Act or adopted rules.
e e n d 18 C.
The department or a peace officer shall not = = l ] 19 require a buyer to disclose financial information related to a l r i 20 the buying or selling of in-shell pecans pursuant to Pecan t e a t Buyers Licensure Act.
m m 21 e d r e 22 SECTION 4.
[NEW MATERIAL ] BUYER'S LICENSE REQUIREMENT-- c e r c 23 APPLICATION.-- e a n b 24 A.
u [ (1) the purchase of in-shell pecans by a .210050.1 - 3 - buyer;
[NEW MATERIAL ] DUTIES OF BUYER--RECORD OF PURCHASE.-- A.
e e 17 (3) comply with state and federal requirementsSB e217 ePage n3 drequirements 18 related to the movement of in-shell pecans;
= = l ] 19 (4) ensure that all of the buyer's employees a l r i 20 involved in the purchasing, receiving or shipping of in-shell t e a t pecans are trained on the provisions of the Pecan Buyers m m 21 e d r e 22 Licensure Act and adopted rules;
c e r c 23 (5) maintain accurate and legible written e a n b 24 records, in a form approved by the department, of the purchase u [ of in-shell pecans that are made in the course of the buyer's .210050.1 - 4 - business;
(6) ensure that records of the purchase of in-in-shell shell pecans are available for inspection by the department or a peace officer within forty-eight hours of the transaction;
and eSB e217 17Page 4 (6) total weight of the in-shell pecans e e n d 18 purchased.
= = l ] 19 C.
If a licensed buyer purchases in-shell pecans a l r i 20 from another licensed buyer, the purchase record shall include t e a t the seller's name, address and telephone number, the date of m m 21 e d r e 22 origin of the in-shell pecans and the total weight of the in-in-shell c e r c 23 shell pecans purchased.
Show all 71 changed lines (31 more)
e a n b 24 SECTION 6.
[NEW MATERIAL ] EXEMPTIONS.-- u [ A.
The Pecan Buyers Licensure Act does not apply .210050.1 - 5 - to:
[NEW MATERIAL ] VIOLATIONS--REVOCATION OF eLICENSE-- eSB 17217 LICENSE--CRIMINALPage PENALTY.--5 ePENALTY.-- e n d 18 A.
The department may revoke a license for = = l ] 19 violations of the Pecan Buyers Licensure Act or the rules or a l r i 20 orders promulgated pursuant to that act.
The department may t e a t deny a subsequent license to a person found to be in violation m m 21 e d r e 22 of the Pecan Buyers Licensure Act.
c e r c 23 B.
A violationperson ofwho violates the provisions of the Pecan e a n b 24 Buyers Licensure Act, or a violation of a rule or order u [ promulgated under that act, after a notice to cease and desist, .210050.1is -guilty 6of -a shallpenalty beassessment deemedmisdemeanor, aand pettythe misdemeanor.penalty assessment is two hundred fifty dollars ($250).
[NEW MATERIAL ] DISPOSITION OF FEES.--All fees collected pursuant to the Pecan Buyers Licensure Act shall be paid into the treasury of New Mexico state university and credited to the department for administration and enforcement of the Pecan Buyers Licensure Act.
SectionEFFECTIVE 30-16-1DATE.--The NMSAeffective 1978date (beingof Lawsthe 1963,provisions Chapterof 303,this Sectionact 16-1, as amended) is amendedJuly to1, read:2018.
"30-16-1.SB 217 Page 6 25
LARCENY.-- A.
Larceny consists of the stealing of anything of value that belongs to another.
B.
Whoever commits larceny when the value of the property stolen is two hundred fifty dollars ($250) or less is guilty of a petty misdemeanor.
e e 17 C.
Whoever commits larceny when the value of the e e n d 18 property stolen is over two hundred fifty dollars ($250) but = = l ] 19 not more than five hundred dollars ($500) is guilty of a a l r i 20 misdemeanor.
t e a t D.
Whoever commits larceny when the value of the m m 21 e d r e 22 property stolen is over five hundred dollars ($500) but not c e r c 23 more than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) is guilty e a n b 24 of a fourth degree felony.
u [ E.
Whoever commits larceny when the value of the .210050.1 - 7 - property stolen is over two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500) but not more than twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) is guilty of a third degree felony.
F.
Whoever commits larceny when the value of the property stolen is over twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) is guilty of a second degree felony.
G.
Whoever commits larceny when the property of value stolen is livestock is guilty of a third degree felony regardless of its value.
H.
Whoever commits larceny when the property of value stolen is a firearm is guilty of a fourth degree felony when its value is less than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500).
I.
Whoever commits larceny when the property of value stolen is twenty-five pounds or more of in-shell pecans is guilty of a misdemeanor when the property's value is not e e 17 more than five hundred dollars ($500)." e e n d 18 SECTION 10.
EFFECTIVE DATE.--The effective date of the = = l ] 19 provisions of this act is July 1, 2018.
a l r i 20 - 8 - t e a t m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .210050.1
Show all 71 changed rows (31 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
passed House
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Agriculture and Water Resources Committee
-
passed Senate
-
floor substitute adopted (1 amendment)
-
DO PASS, as amended, committee report adopted
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
germane
-
Sent to Senate Committees' Committee & Senate Conservation Committee & Senate Judiciary Committee
Sponsors
- Cliff R. Pirtle · Primary
- George K. Munoz · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Pirtle, Cliff R.
- Munoz, George K.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (110)
110 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 110 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democrat | 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 63 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 1% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (70)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Salazar, Tomás | — | Yea |
| Gonzales | — | Yea |
| Maestas Barnes | — | Yea |
| Garcia Richard | — | Yea |
| Martmnez, Javier | — | Yea |
| Rehm | — | Yea |
| Garcma, M.P. | — | Not Voting |
| Salazar, Nick | — | Not Voting |
| Adkins | — | Yea |
| Alcon | — | Yea |
| Baldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Bandy | — | Not Voting |
| Chasey | — | Yea |
| Clahchischilliage | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Crowder | — | Yea |
| Dines | — | Yea |
| Dodge | — | Yea |
| Egolf | — | Yea |
| Ely | — | Yea |
| Fajardo | — | Yea |
| Gentry | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Herrell | — | Yea |
| Larrañaga | — | Yea |
| Lewis | — | Yea |
| Louis | — | Not Voting |
| McCamley | — | Yea |
| Nibert | — | Yea |
| Powdrell-Culbert | — | Yea |
| Roch | — | Yea |
| Rodella | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Ruiloba | — | Yea |
| Stapleton | — | Yea |
| Strickler | — | Yea |
| Sweetser | — | Yea |
| Wooley | — | Yea |
| Youngblood | — | Yea |
| Angelica Rubio | Democrat | Yea |
| Antonio Maestas | Democrat | Yea |
| Charlotte Little | Democrat | Yea |
| D. Wonda Johnson | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra M. Sariñana | Democrat | Yea |
| Derrick J. Lente | Democrat | Yea |
| Doreen Y. Gallegos | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth "Liz" Thomson | Democrat | Yea |
| Joanne J. Ferrary | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Martha Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Matthew McQueen | Democrat | Nay |
| Nathan P. Small | Democrat | Yea |
| Patricia A. Lundstrom | Democrat | Yea |
| Patricia Roybal Caballero | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Alan T. Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Candy Spence Ezzell | Republican | Yea |
| Cathrynn N. Brown | Republican | Yea |
| David M. Gallegos | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Armstrong | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Armstrong | Republican | Yea |
| James G. Townsend | Republican | Yea |
| Larry R. Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Rebecca Dow | Republican | Yea |
| Rod Montoya | Republican | Yea |
| William A. Hall II | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McSORLEY | — | Yea |
| BURT | — | Yea |
| PAPEN | — | Yea |
| KERNAN | — | Yea |
| INGLE | — | Yea |
| SAPIEN | — | Yea |
| O'NEILL | — | Yea |
| GOULD | — | Yea |
| RUE | — | Yea |
| PIRTLE | — | Yea |
| MOORES | — | Yea |
| WHITE | — | Yea |
| PAYNE | — | Yea |
| LEAVELL | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| NEVILLE | — | Yea |
| IVEY-SOTO | — | Yea |
| GRIGGS | — | Yea |
| SANCHEZ | — | Yea |
| RODRIGUEZ | — | Yea |
| MORALES | — | Yea |
| CANDELARIA | — | Not Voting |
| CISNEROS | — | Not Voting |
| TALLMAN | — | Not Voting |
| ORTIZ y PINO | — | Yea |
| Antoinette Sedillo Lopez | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Benny Shendo, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics | Democrat | Yea |
| George K. Muñoz | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Steinborn | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Joseph Cervantes | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Padilla | Democrat | Yea |
| Mimi Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Pete Campos | Democrat | Yea |
| Peter Wirth | Democrat | Yea |
| Shannon D. Pinto | Democrat | Yea |
| William P. Soules | Democrat | Yea |
| Alan T. Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Brian G. Baca | Republican | Yea |
| Craig W. Brandt | Republican | Yea |
| Pat Woods | Republican | Yea |
| William E. Sharer | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 217?
- SB 217 is sponsored by Pirtle, Cliff R. and Munoz, George K..
- What is the current status of SB 217?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 29, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 217?
- Track SB 217 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 217
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 217
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →