New Mexico 2018 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 157 — PHASED-IN TEACHER COST INDEX

Last action — Pocket Veto

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

477 added · 694 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of SB 157 introduces a "phased-in teacher cost index" aimed at improving financial support for teachers in New Mexico's public schools. Additionally, it mandates a study to evaluate whether this new index is meeting necessary funding standards. The bill also makes adjustments to the at-risk funding index and eliminates the previous requirement for a funding formula study task force. These changes are important as they seek to better address the financial challenges faced by teachers and enhance educational funding structures, potentially leading to improved learning environments for students.

→
Previous
Latest
SENATE BILL 157 53RD LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - SECOND SESSION , 2018 INTRODUCED BY Howie C.
AN ACT RELATING TO PUBLIC SCHOOL FINANCE;
Morales and Dennis J.
Roch 6 8 FOR THE LEGISLATIVE EDUCATION STUDY COMMITTEE 10 AN ACT RELATING TO PUBLIC SCHOOL FINANCE;
REPEALING THE SECTION OF LAW CREATING THE FUNDING FORMULA STUDY TASK FORCE;
REPEALING THE SECTION OF LAW CREATING THE FUNDING FORMULA STUDY TASK FORCE.
MAKING AN APPROPRIATION.
8 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
e t 17 w l n d 18 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
SECTION 1.
= = 19 SECTION 1.
Section 22-8-2 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1978, Chapter 128, Section 3, as amended) is amended to read:
Section 22-8-2 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1978, a l i a e r 20 Chapter 128, Section 3, as amended) is amended to read:
"22-8-2.
a t m m 21 "22-8-2.
DEFINITIONS.--As used in the Public School Finance Act:
DEFINITIONS.--As used in the Public School d r e 22 Finance Act:
A.
c e s k 23 A.
e a n b 24 B.
B.
"membership" means the total enrollment of u [ qualified students on the current roll of a class or school on .209436.1 a specified day.
"membership" means the total enrollment of qualified students on the current roll of a class or school on a specified day.
C.
SB 157 C.
"basic program ADM" or "basic program MEM" means the MEM of qualified students but excludes the full-time- equivalent MEM in early childhood education and three- and four-year-old students receiving special education services;
"basic program ADM" or "basic program MEM" Page 1 means the MEM of qualified students but excludes the full-time-equivalent MEM in early childhood education and three- and four-year-old students receiving special education services;
"cost differential factor" is the numerical expression of the ratio of the cost of a particular segment of the school program to the cost of the basic program in grades e e 17 four through six;
"cost differential factor" is the numerical expression of the ratio of the cost of a particular segment of the school program to the cost of the basic program in grades four through six;
e e n d 18 E.
E.
"department" or "division" means the public = = l ] 19 education department;
"department" or "division" means the public education department;
a l r i 20 F.
F.
"early childhood education ADM" or "early t e a t childhood education MEM" means the full-time-equivalent MEM of m m 21 e d r e 22 students attending approved early childhood education programs;
"early childhood education ADM" or "early childhood education MEM" means the full-time-equivalent MEM of students attending approved early childhood education programs;
c e r c 23 G.
G.
"full-time-equivalent ADM" or "full-time- e a n b 24 equivalent MEM" is that membership calculated by applying to u [ the MEM in an approved public school program the ratio of the .209436.1 - 2 - number of hours per school day devoted to the program to six hours or the number of hours per school week devoted to the program to thirty hours;
"full-time-equivalent ADM" or "full-time-equivalent MEM" is that membership calculated by applying to the MEM in an approved public school program the ratio of the number of hours per school day devoted to the program to six hours or the number of hours per school week devoted to the program to thirty hours;
"program cost" is the product of the total number of program units to which a school district is entitled multiplied by the dollar value per program unit established by the legislature;
"program cost" is the product of the total number of program units to which a school district is SB 157 Page 2 entitled multiplied by the dollar value per program unit established by the legislature;
"program element" is that component of a public school system to which a cost differential factor is applied to determine the number of program units to which a school district is entitled, including [but not limited to ] MEM, full- time-equivalent MEM, teacher, classroom or public school;
"program element" is that component of a public school system to which a cost differential factor is applied to determine the number of program units to which a school district is entitled, including MEM, full-time-equivalent MEM, teacher, classroom or public school;
"program unit" is the product of the program e e 17 element multiplied by the applicable cost differential factor;
"program unit" is the product of the program element multiplied by the applicable cost differential factor;
e e n d 18 L.
L.
"public money" or "public funds" means all money = = l ] 19 from public or private sources received by a school district or a l r i 20 state-chartered charter school or officer or employee of a t e a t school district or state-chartered charter school for public m m 21 e d r e 22 use;
"public money" or "public funds" means all money from public or private sources received by a school district or state-chartered charter school or officer or employee of a school district or state-chartered charter school for public use;
c e r c 23 M.
M.
"qualified student" means a public school e a n b 24 student who:
"qualified student" means a public school student who:
u [ (1) has not graduated from high school;
(1) has not graduated from high school;
.209436.1 - 3 - (2) is regularly enrolled in one-half or more of the minimum course requirements approved by the department for public school students;
(2) is regularly enrolled in one-half or more of the minimum course requirements approved by the department for public school students;
(b) is at least three years of age at any time during the school year and is receiving special education services pursuant to rules of the department;
(b) is at least three years of age at SB 157 Page 3 any time during the school year and is receiving special education services pursuant to rules of the department;
[and ] N.
N.
e e 17 (2) for fiscal year 2020, the weighted average e e n d 18 of the instructional staff training and experience index at = = l ] 19 seventy-five percent and the teacher cost index at twenty-five a l r i 20 percent;
(2) for fiscal year 2020, the weighted average of the instructional staff training and experience index at seventy-five percent and the teacher cost index at twenty-five percent;
t e a t (3) for fiscal year 2021, the weighted average m m 21 e d r e 22 of the instructional staff training and experience index at c e r c 23 fifty percent and the teacher cost index at fifty percent;
(3) for fiscal year 2021, the weighted average of the instructional staff training and experience index at fifty percent and the teacher cost index at fifty percent;
e a n b 24 (4) for fiscal year 2022, the weighted average u [ of the instructional staff training and experience index at .209436.1 - 4 - twenty-five percent and the teacher cost index at seventy-five percent;
(4) for fiscal year 2022, the weighted average of the instructional staff training and experience index at twenty-five percent and the teacher cost index at seventy-five percent;
and [N.] O.
and O.
"state superintendent" means the secretary 6 of public education or the secretary's designee." SECTION 2.
"state superintendent" means the secretary of public education or the secretary's designee." SB 157 Page 4 SECTION 2.
Each state-chartered charter school shall submit to the charter schools division of the department a school- based budget.
Each state-chartered charter school shall submit to the charter schools division of the department a school-based budget.
[For the first year of operation, the budget of every state-chartered charter school shall be based on the projected number of program units generated by that charter school and its students, using the at-risk index and the instructional staff training and experience index of the school e e 17 district in which it is geographically located.
The budget shall be submitted to the division for approval or amendment pursuant to the Public School Finance Act and the Charter Schools Act.
Show all 115 changed rows (75 more)
Previous
Latest
For second and e e n d 18 subsequent fiscal years of operation, the budgets of state- = = l ] 19 chartered charter schools shall be based on the number of a l r i 20 program units generated using the average of the MEM on the t e a t second and third reporting dates of the prior year and its own m m 21 e d r e 22 instructional staff training and experience index and the at- c e r c 23 risk index of the school district in which the state-chartered e a n b 24 charter school is geographically located.] The budget shall be u [ submitted to the division for approval or amendment pursuant to .209436.1 - 5 - the Public School Finance Act and the Charter Schools Act.
Each locally chartered charter school shall submit to the local school board a school-based budget [For the first year of operation, the budget of every locally chartered charter school shall be based on the projected number of program units generated by the charter school and its students, using the at-risk index and the instructional staff training and experience index of the school district in which it is geographically located.
Each locally chartered charter school shall submit to the local school board a school-based budget for approval or amendment.
For second and subsequent fiscal years of operation, the budgets of locally chartered charter schools shall be based on the number of program units generated using the average of the MEM on the second and third reporting dates of the prior year and its own instructional staff training and experience index and the at-risk index of the school district e e 17 in which the locally chartered charter school is geographically e e n d 18 located.
The approval or amendment authority of the local school board relative to the charter school budget is limited to ensuring that sound fiscal practices are followed in the development of the budget and that the charter school budget is within the allotted resources.
The budget shall be submitted to the local school = = l ] 19 board] for approval or amendment.
The local school board shall have no veto authority over individual line items within the charter school's proposed budget, but shall approve or disapprove the budget in its entirety.
The approval or amendment a l r i 20 authority of the local school board relative to the charter t e a t school budget is limited to ensuring that sound fiscal m m 21 e d r e 22 practices are followed in the development of the budget and c e r c 23 that the charter school budget is within the allotted e a n b 24 resources.
The local school board shall have no veto authority u [ over individual line items within the charter school's proposed .209436.1 - 6 - budget, but shall approve or disapprove the budget in its entirety.
C.
SB 157 Page 5 C.
For [the ] its first year of operation, [after a locally chartered charter school converts to a state-chartered charter school or a state-chartered charter school converts to a locally chartered charter school, the charter school's budget shall be based on the number of program units generated using the average of the MEM on the second and third reporting dates of the prior year and the instructional staff training and experience index and the at-risk index of the school district in which it is geographically located.
For its first year of operation, a charter school's budget shall be based on the projected number of program units generated by the school and its students using the at-risk index and the staffing cost multiplier of the school district in which the school is located, and the school's budget shall be adjusted using the qualified MEM on the first reporting date of the current school year.
For second and subsequent fiscal years of operation, the charter school shall e e 17 follow the provisions of Subsection A or B of this section, as e e n d 18 applicable] a charter school's budget shall be based on the = = l ] 19 projected number of program units generated by the school and a l r i 20 its students using the at-risk index and the staffing cost t e a t multiplier of the school district in which the school is m m 21 e d r e 22 located, and the school's budget shall be adjusted using the c e r c 23 qualified MEM on the first reporting date of the current school e a n b 24 year.
For its second and subsequent fiscal years of operation, a charter school's budget shall be based on the number of program units generated by the school and its students using the average of the MEM on the second and third reporting dates of the prior year, the at-risk index of the school district in which the school is located and the school's staffing cost multiplier." SECTION 3.
For its second and subsequent fiscal years of operation, u [ a charter school's budget shall be based on the number of .209436.1 - 7 - program units generated by the school and its students using the average of the MEM on the second and third reporting dates of the prior year, the at-risk index of the school district in which the school is located and the school's staffing cost multiplier." 6 SECTION 3.
For fiscal year 2019 , the total program units for the purpose of computing the program cost shall be calculated by multiplying the sum of the program units itemized as Paragraphs (1) through (6) in this subsection by the [instructional staff training and experience index ] staffing cost multiplier and adding the program units itemized as Paragraphs (7) through (14) in this subsection.
For fiscal year 2019, the total program units for the purpose of computing the program cost shall be calculated by multiplying the sum of the program units itemized as Paragraphs (1) through (6) in this subsection by the staffing cost multiplier and adding the program units itemized as Paragraphs (7) through (14) in this subsection.
For fiscal e e 17 year 2020 and subsequent fiscal years, the total program units e e n d 18 for the purpose of computing the program cost shall be = = l ] 19 calculated by multiplying the sum of the program units itemized a l r i 20 as Paragraphs (1) and (2) in this subsection by the staffing t e a t cost multiplier and adding the program units itemized as m m 21 e d r e 22 Paragraphs (3) through (14) in this subsection.
For fiscal year 2020 and subsequent fiscal years, the total program units for the purpose of computing the program cost SB 157 Page 6 shall be calculated by multiplying the sum of the program units itemized as Paragraphs (1) and (2) in this subsection by the staffing cost multiplier and adding the program units itemized as Paragraphs (3) through (14) in this subsection.
The itemized c e r c 23 program units are as follows:
The itemized program units are as follows:
e a n b 24 (1) early childhood education;
(1) early childhood education;
u [ (2) basic education;
(2) basic education;
.209436.1 - 8 - (3) special education, adjusted by subtracting the units derived from membership in class D special education programs in private, nonsectarian, nonprofit training centers;
(3) special education, adjusted by subtracting the units derived from membership in class D special education programs in private, nonsectarian, nonprofit training centers;
e e 17 (13) home school student activities;
(13) home school student activities;
and e e n d 18 (14) charter school student activities.
and SB 157 Page 7 (14) charter school student activities.
= = l ] 19 B.
B.
The total program cost calculated as prescribed a l r i 20 in Subsection A of this section includes the cost of early t e a t childhood, special, bilingual multicultural, fine arts and m m 21 e d r e 22 vocational education and other remedial or enrichment programs.
The total program cost calculated as prescribed in Subsection A of this section includes the cost of early childhood, special, bilingual multicultural, fine arts and vocational education and other remedial or enrichment programs.
c e r c 23 It is the responsibility of the local school board or, for a e a n b 24 charter school, the governing body of the charter school to u [ determine its priorities in terms of the needs of the community .209436.1 - 9 - served by that board.
It is the responsibility of the local school board or, for a charter school, the governing body of the charter school to determine its priorities in terms of the needs of the community served by that board.
A school district is eligible for additional e e 17 program units if it establishes within its department-approved e e n d 18 educational plan identified services to assist students to = = l ] 19 reach their full academic potential.
A school district is eligible for additional SB 157 Page 8 program units if it establishes within its department-approved educational plan identified services to assist students to reach their full academic potential.
A school district a l r i 20 receiving additional at-risk program units shall include a t e a t report of specified services implemented to improve the m m 21 e d r e 22 academic success of at-risk students.
A school district receiving additional at-risk program units shall include a report of specified services implemented to improve the academic success of at-risk students.
The report shall c e r c 23 identify the ways in which the school district and individual e a n b 24 schools use funding generated through the at-risk index and the u [ intended outcomes.
The report shall identify the ways in which the school district and individual schools use funding generated through the at-risk index and the intended outcomes.
For purposes of this section, "at-risk .209436.1 - 10 - student" means a student who meets the criteria to be included in the calculation of the three-year average total rate in Subsection B of this section.
For purposes of this section, "at-risk student" means a student who meets the criteria to be included in the calculation of the three-year average total rate in Subsection B of this section.
(1) for fiscal year 2019 , Three-Year Average Total Rate x [0.106 ] 0.130 = At-Risk Index;
(1) for fiscal year 2019, Three-Year Average Total Rate x 0.130 = At-Risk Index;
and (3) for fiscal year 2021 and subsequent fiscal years, e e 17 Three-Year Average Total Rate x 0.150 = At-Risk Index.
and (3) for fiscal year 2021 and subsequent SB 157 Page 9 fiscal years, Three-Year Average Total Rate x 0.150 = At-Risk Index.
e e n d 18 B.
B.
To calculate the three-year average total rate, = = l ] 19 the department shall compute a three-year average of the school a l r i 20 district's percentage of membership used to determine its Title t e a t I allocation, a three-year average of the percentage of m m 21 e d r e 22 membership classified as English language learners using c e r c 23 criteria established by the federal office of civil rights and e a n b 24 a three-year average of the percentage of student mobility.
To calculate the three-year average total rate, the department shall compute a three-year average of the school district's percentage of membership used to determine its Title I allocation, a three-year average of the percentage of membership classified as English language learners using criteria established by the federal office of civil rights and a three-year average of the percentage of student mobility.
u [ The department shall then add the three-year average rates.
The department shall then add the three-year average rates.
.209436.1 - 11 - The number obtained from this calculation is the three-year average total rate.
The number obtained from this calculation is the three-year average total rate.
"[NEW MATERIAL] TEACHER COST INDEX--LICENSURE-EXPERIENCE FACTOR--REPORT.-- A.
"TEACHER COST INDEX--LICENSURE-EXPERIENCE FACTOR-- REPORT.-- A.
The teacher cost index for a school district or charter school in its second or subsequent year of operations is the greater of 1.0 or the average of the licensure-experience factors of all full-time-equivalent teachers on the school district's or e e 17 charter school's payroll in October of that year who are e e n d 18 assigned classroom teaching responsibilities.
The teacher cost index for a school district or charter school in its second or subsequent year of operations is the greater of 1.0 or the average of the SB 157 Page 10 licensure-experience factors of all full-time-equivalent teachers on the school district's or charter school's payroll in October of that year who are assigned classroom teaching responsibilities.
The licensure- = = l ] 19 experience factor of a teacher corresponds to the teacher's a l r i 20 licensure level and years of experience and is as follows:
The licensure-experience factor of a teacher corresponds to the teacher's licensure level and years of experience and is as follows:
t e a t Licensure m m 21 e d r e 22 Level Years of Experience c e r c 23 0 to 2 3 to 5 6 to 8 9 to 15 Over 15 e a n b 24 1 0.755 0.785 0.800 u [ 2 0.994 1.023 1.050 1.123 .209436.1 - 12 - 3 1.184 1.208 1.277.
Licensure Level Years of Experience 0 to 2 3 to 5 6 to 8 9 to 15 Over 15 1 0.755 0.785 0.800 2 0.994 1.023 1.050 1.123 3 1.184 1.208 1.277.
(1) data on the relationship of licensure- experience factors to actual teacher costs;
(1) data on the relationship of licensure-experience factors to actual teacher costs;
C.
SB 157 Page 11 C.
(1) "licensure level" is the teaching licensure e e 17 level as defined in the School Personnel Act;
(1) "licensure level" is the teaching licensure level as defined in the School Personnel Act;
and e e n d 18 (2) "years of experience" is as defined by = = l ] 19 department rule." a l r i 20 SECTION 6.
and (2) "years of experience" is as defined by department rule." SECTION 6.
Section 22-8-25 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1981, t e a t Chapter 176, Section 5, as amended) is amended to read:
Section 22-8-25 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1981, Chapter 176, Section 5, as amended) is amended to read:
m m 21 e d r e 22 "22-8-25.
"22-8-25.
STATE EQUALIZATION GUARANTEE DISTRIBUTION-- c e r c 23 DEFINITIONS--DETERMINATION OF AMOUNT.-- e a n b 24 A.
STATE EQUALIZATION GUARANTEE DISTRIBUTION-- DEFINITIONS--DETERMINATION OF AMOUNT.-- A.
The state equalization guarantee distribution is u [ that amount of money distributed to each school district to .209436.1 - 13 - ensure that its operating revenue, including its local and federal revenues as defined in this section, is at least equal to the school district's program cost.
The state equalization guarantee distribution is that amount of money distributed to each school district to ensure that its operating revenue, including its local and federal revenues as defined in this section, is at least equal to the school district's program cost.
For state- chartered charter schools, the state equalization guarantee distribution is the difference between the state-chartered charter school's program cost and the two percent withheld by the department for administrative services.
For state-chartered charter schools, the state equalization guarantee distribution is the difference between the state-chartered charter school's program cost and the two percent withheld by the department for administrative services.
"Local revenue", as used in this section, means seventy-five percent of receipts to the school district derived from that amount produced by a school district property tax applied at the rate of fifty cents ($.50) to each one thousand dollars ($1,000) of net taxable value of property allocated to the school district and to the assessed value of products severed and sold in the school district as determined under the Oil and Gas Ad Valorem Production Tax Act and upon the assessed value of equipment in the school district as determined under e e 17 the Oil and Gas Production Equipment Ad Valorem Tax Act.
"Local revenue", as used in this section, means seventy-five percent of receipts to the school district derived from that amount produced by a school district property tax applied at the rate of fifty cents ($.50) to each one thousand dollars ($1,000) of net taxable value of property allocated to the school district and to the assessed SB 157 Page 12 value of products severed and sold in the school district as determined under the Oil and Gas Ad Valorem Production Tax Act and upon the assessed value of equipment in the school district as determined under the Oil and Gas Production Equipment Ad Valorem Tax Act.
e e n d 18 C.
C.
"Federal revenue", as used in this section, = = l ] 19 means receipts to the school district or state-chartered a l r i 20 charter school, excluding amounts that, if taken into account t e a t in the computation of the state equalization guarantee m m 21 e d r e 22 distribution, result, under federal law or regulations, in a c e r c 23 reduction in or elimination of federal school funding otherwise e a n b 24 receivable by the school district, derived from the following:
"Federal revenue", as used in this section, means receipts to the school district or state-chartered charter school, excluding amounts that, if taken into account in the computation of the state equalization guarantee distribution, result, under federal law or regulations, in a reduction in or elimination of federal school funding otherwise receivable by the school district, derived from the following:
u [ (1) seventy-five percent of the school .209436.1 - 14 - district's share of forest reserve funds distributed in accordance with Section 22-8-33 NMSA 1978;
(1) seventy-five percent of the school district's share of forest reserve funds distributed in accordance with Section 22-8-33 NMSA 1978;
(1) calculate the number of program units to which each school district or charter school is entitled using an average of the MEM on the second and third reporting dates of the prior year;
(1) calculate the number of program units to which each school district or charter school is entitled SB 157 Page 13 using an average of the MEM on the second and third reporting dates of the prior year;
or (2) calculate the number of program units to which a school district or charter school operating under an approved year-round school calendar is entitled using an e e 17 average of the MEM on appropriate dates established by the e e n d 18 department;
or (2) calculate the number of program units to which a school district or charter school operating under an approved year-round school calendar is entitled using an average of the MEM on appropriate dates established by the department;
or = = l ] 19 (3) calculate the number of program units to a l r i 20 which a school district or charter school with a MEM of two t e a t hundred or less is entitled by using an average of the MEM on m m 21 e d r e 22 the second and third reporting dates of the prior year or the c e r c 23 fortieth day of the current year, whichever is greater;
or (3) calculate the number of program units to which a school district or charter school with a MEM of two hundred or less is entitled by using an average of the MEM on the second and third reporting dates of the prior year or the fortieth day of the current year, whichever is greater;
and e a n b 24 (4) using the results of the calculations in u [ Paragraph (1), (2) or (3) of this subsection and the .209436.1 - 15 - [instructional staff training and experience index ] staffing cost multiplier from the October report of the prior school year, establish a total program cost of the school district or charter school;
and (4) using the results of the calculations in Paragraph (1), (2) or (3) of this subsection and the staffing cost multiplier from the October report of the prior school year, establish a total program cost of the school district or charter school;
(7) deduct the total amount of guaranteed energy savings contract payments that the department determines will be made to the school district from the public school utility conservation fund during the fiscal year for which the state equalization guarantee distribution is being computed;
(7) deduct the total amount of guaranteed energy savings contract payments that the department SB 157 Page 14 determines will be made to the school district from the public school utility conservation fund during the fiscal year for which the state equalization guarantee distribution is being computed;
and (8) deduct ninety percent of the amount e e 17 certified for the school district by the department pursuant to e e n d 18 the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Bonding Act.
and (8) deduct ninety percent of the amount certified for the school district by the department pursuant to the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Bonding Act.
= = l ] 19 E.
E.
Reduction of a school district's state a l r i 20 equalization guarantee distribution shall cease when the school t e a t district's cumulative reductions equal its proportional share m m 21 e d r e 22 of the cumulative debt service payments necessary to service c e r c 23 the bonds issued pursuant to the Energy Efficiency and e a n b 24 Renewable Energy Bonding Act.
Reduction of a school district's state equalization guarantee distribution shall cease when the school district's cumulative reductions equal its proportional share of the cumulative debt service payments necessary to service the bonds issued pursuant to the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Bonding Act.
u [ F.
F.
The amount of the state equalization guarantee .209436.1 - 16 - distribution to which a school district is entitled is the balance remaining after the deductions made in Paragraphs (6) through (8) of Subsection D of this section.
The amount of the state equalization guarantee distribution to which a school district is entitled is the balance remaining after the deductions made in Paragraphs (6) through (8) of Subsection D of this section.
In the event that a school district or charter school has received more state equalization guarantee funds than its entitlement, a refund shall be made by the school district or charter school to the state general fund." SECTION 7.
In the event that a school district or charter school has received more state equalization guarantee SB 157 Page 15 funds than its entitlement, a refund shall be made by the school district or charter school to the state general fund." SECTION 7.
Using funds appropriated by the legislature for e e 17 fiscal years 2020 through 2022, the public education department e e n d 18 shall supplement a school district's or charter school's = = l ] 19 calculated program cost in each of those fiscal years:
Using funds appropriated by the legislature for fiscal years 2020 through 2022, the public education department shall supplement a school district's or charter school's calculated program cost in each of those fiscal years:
a l r i 20 (1) if, for the fiscal year, the school t e a t district's or charter school's calculated program cost is less m m 21 e d r e 22 than its final program cost in the previous fiscal year, not c e r c 23 considering any supplement the school district or charter e a n b 24 school receives under this subsection;
(1) if, for the fiscal year, the school district's or charter school's calculated program cost is less than its final program cost in the previous fiscal year, not considering any supplement the school district or charter school receives under this subsection;
and u [ (2) as follows:
and (2) as follows:
.209436.1 - 17 - (a) for fiscal year 2020, in an amount equal to one hundred percent of the reduction attributable to the implementation of this act or the difference between the calculated program cost and the final program cost in the previous fiscal year, whichever is less;
(a) for fiscal year 2020, in an amount equal to one hundred percent of the reduction attributable to the implementation of this act or the difference between the calculated program cost and the final program cost in the previous fiscal year, whichever is less;
and (c) for fiscal year 2022, in an amount equal to fifty percent of the reduction attributable to the implementation of this act or the difference between the calculated program cost and the final program cost in the previous fiscal year, whichever is less;
and SB 157 Page 16 (c) for fiscal year 2022, in an amount equal to fifty percent of the reduction attributable to the implementation of this act or the difference between the calculated program cost and the final program cost in the previous fiscal year, whichever is less;
but (3) if, in a fiscal year, the appropriation for e e 17 the purpose of implementing this subsection is insufficient to e e n d 18 supplement school districts and charter schools in accordance = = l ] 19 with Paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection, then in an a l r i 20 amount equal to the school district's or charter school's t e a t prorated share of the total appropriation.
but (3) if, in a fiscal year, the appropriation for the purpose of implementing this subsection is insufficient to supplement school districts and charter schools in accordance with Paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection, then in an amount equal to the school district's or charter school's prorated share of the total appropriation.
m m 21 e d r e 22 B.
B.
On or before February 1 of 2020 through 2022, c e r c 23 the public education department shall submit a report to the e a n b 24 legislative education study committee and the legislative u [ finance committee that states, regarding the current fiscal .209436.1 - 18 - year:
On or before February 1 of 2020 through 2022, the public education department shall submit a report to the legislative education study committee and the legislative finance committee that states, regarding the current fiscal year:
SECTION 8.
SB 157 Page 17 SECTION 8.
APPROPRIATION.--Twenty-two million five hundred forty-one thousand four hundred dollars ($22,541,400) is appropriated from the general fund to the state equalization guarantee distribution for expenditure in fiscal year 2019 to offset the rise in costs from the increase in the at-risk index effected by this act.
REPEAL.--Section 22-8-46 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 2005, Chapter 49, Section 1, as amended) is repealed.
Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2019 shall revert to the general fund.
SECTION 9.
e e 17 SECTION 9.
EFFECTIVE DATE.--The effective date of the provisions of this act is July 1, 2018.
REPEAL.--Section 22-8-46 NMSA 1978 (being Laws e e n d 18 2005, Chapter 49, Section 1, as amended) is repealed.
SB 157 Page 18 6 8 25
= = l ] 19 SECTION 10.
EFFECTIVE DATE.--The effective date of the a l r i 20 provisions of this act is July 1, 2018.
t e a t - 19 - m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .209436.1
View plain text versions (2)

How this bill changes current law

4 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

This bill amends the Public School Finance Act to establish a phased-in teacher cost index and adjusts the at-risk index while repealing the funding formula study task force.

  • Section 22-8-2 NMSA 1978

    establish a phased-in teacher cost index;

    This introduces a new teacher cost index into the Public School Finance Act.

  • Section 22-8-6.1 NMSA 1978

    requiring a study to evaluate the index's sufficiency;

    This mandates a study to assess how effective the new teacher cost index is.

  • Section 22-8-23.3 NMSA 1978

    making a phased-in adjustment to the at-risk index;

    This allows for gradual changes to the at-risk index over time.

  • the section of law creating the funding formula study task force.

    This removes the task force that was previously responsible for studying the funding formula.

Action History

  1. Pocket Veto

  2. passed House

  3. withdrawn from committee

  4. DO PASS committee report adopted

  5. Sent to House Education Committee & House Appropriations and Finance Committee

  6. passed Senate

  7. DO PASS, as amended, committee report adopted

  8. DO PASS committee report adopted

  9. germane

  10. Sent to Senate Committees' Committee & Senate Education Committee & Senate Finance Committee

Sponsors

  • Howie C. Morales · Primary
  • Dennis J. Roch · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

  • Morales, Howie C.
  • Roch, Dennis J.

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (110)

110 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 110 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

house passage

Passed 64 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 38003
Democrat 16002
Republican 10001
Total 64006
% of votes cast 91%0%0%9%
How each member voted (70)
Member Party Vote
Smith — Yea
Salazar, Nick — Yea
Salazar, Tomás — Yea
Gonzales — Yea
Maestas Barnes — Yea
Garcia Richard — Yea
Martmnez, Javier — Yea
Rehm — Yea
Garcma, M.P. — Not Voting
Adkins — Yea
Alcon — Yea
Baldonado — Yea
Bandy — Yea
Chasey — Yea
Clahchischilliage — Yea
Cook — Not Voting
Crowder — Yea
Dines — Yea
Dodge — Yea
Egolf — Yea
Ely — Yea
Fajardo — Yea
Gentry — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Harper — Yea
Herrell — Yea
Larrañaga — Yea
Lewis — Yea
Louis — Not Voting
McCamley — Yea
Nibert — Yea
Powdrell-Culbert — Yea
Roch — Yea
Rodella — Yea
Romero — Yea
Ruiloba — Yea
Stapleton — Yea
Strickler — Yea
Sweetser — Yea
Wooley — Yea
Youngblood — Yea
Angelica Rubio Democrat Yea
Antonio Maestas Democrat Yea
Charlotte Little Democrat Yea
D. Wonda Johnson Democrat Yea
Debra M. Sariñana Democrat Yea
Derrick J. Lente Democrat Yea
Doreen Y. Gallegos Democrat Not Voting
Elizabeth "Liz" Thomson Democrat Yea
Joanne J. Ferrary Democrat Yea
Linda M. Trujillo Democrat Yea
Linda M. Trujillo Democrat Yea
Linda M. Trujillo Democrat Yea
Linda M. Trujillo Democrat Yea
Martha Garcia Democrat Yea
Matthew McQueen Democrat Yea
Nathan P. Small Democrat Yea
Patricia A. Lundstrom Democrat Yea
Patricia Roybal Caballero Democrat Not Voting
Alan T. Martinez Republican Yea
Candy Spence Ezzell Republican Yea
Cathrynn N. Brown Republican Yea
David M. Gallegos Republican Not Voting
Gail Armstrong Republican Yea
Gail Armstrong Republican Yea
James G. Townsend Republican Yea
Larry R. Scott Republican Yea
Rebecca Dow Republican Yea
Rod Montoya Republican Yea
William A. Hall II Republican Yea

Official roll call →

senate passage

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 21004
Democrat 12000
Republican 5000
Total 38004
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (42)
Member Party Vote
CANDELARIA — Yea
PAPEN — Yea
KERNAN — Yea
INGLE — Yea
SAPIEN — Yea
O'NEILL — Yea
GOULD — Yea
RUE — Yea
PIRTLE — Yea
MOORES — Yea
WHITE — Yea
PAYNE — Yea
LEAVELL — Yea
SMITH — Yea
IVEY-SOTO — Yea
SANCHEZ — Yea
CISNEROS — Yea
RODRIGUEZ — Yea
MORALES — Yea
TALLMAN — Yea
McSORLEY — Not Voting
NEVILLE — Not Voting
BURT — Not Voting
GRIGGS — Not Voting
ORTIZ y PINO — Yea
Antoinette Sedillo Lopez Democrat Yea
Benny Shendo, Jr. Democrat Yea
Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics Democrat Yea
George K. Muñoz Democrat Yea
Jeff Steinborn Democrat Yea
Joseph Cervantes Democrat Yea
Michael Padilla Democrat Yea
Mimi Stewart Democrat Yea
Pete Campos Democrat Yea
Peter Wirth Democrat Yea
Shannon D. Pinto Democrat Yea
William P. Soules Democrat Yea
Alan T. Martinez Republican Yea
Brian G. Baca Republican Yea
Craig W. Brandt Republican Yea
Pat Woods Republican Yea
William E. Sharer Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 157?
SB 157 is sponsored by Morales, Howie C. and Roch, Dennis J..
What is the current status of SB 157?
This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 157?
Track SB 157 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 157

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 157

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →