PHASED-IN TEACHER COST INDEX
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 157 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 157.
You're tracking SB 157
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 157 — PHASED-IN TEACHER COST INDEX
Last action — Pocket Veto
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
477 added · 694 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of SB 157 introduces a "phased-in teacher cost index" aimed at improving financial support for teachers in New Mexico's public schools. Additionally, it mandates a study to evaluate whether this new index is meeting necessary funding standards. The bill also makes adjustments to the at-risk funding index and eliminates the previous requirement for a funding formula study task force. These changes are important as they seek to better address the financial challenges faced by teachers and enhance educational funding structures, potentially leading to improved learning environments for students.
SENATEAN BILLACT 157RELATING 53RDTO LEGISLATUREPUBLIC -SCHOOL STATEFINANCE; OF NEW MEXICO - SECOND SESSION , 2018 INTRODUCED BY Howie C.
Morales and Dennis J.
Roch 6 8 FOR THE LEGISLATIVE EDUCATION STUDY COMMITTEE 10 AN ACT RELATING TO PUBLIC SCHOOL FINANCE;
REPEALING THE SECTION OF LAW CREATING THE FUNDING FORMULA STUDY TASK FORCE;FORCE.
MAKING8 ANBE APPROPRIATION.IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
eSECTION t1. 17 w l n d 18 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO:
=Section =22-8-2 19NMSA SECTION1978 1.(being Laws 1978, Chapter 128, Section 3, as amended) is amended to read:
Section"22-8-2. 22-8-2 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1978, a l i a e r 20 Chapter 128, Section 3, as amended) is amended to read:
aDEFINITIONS.--As tused min mthe 21Public "22-8-2.School Finance Act:
DEFINITIONS.--AsA. used in the Public School d r e 22 Finance Act:
c e s k 23 A.
e a n b 24 B.
"membership" means the total enrollment of u [ qualified students on the current roll of a class or school on .209436.1 a specified day.
SB 157 C.
"basic program ADM" or "basic program MEM" Page 1 means the MEM of qualified students but excludes the full-time-full-time-equivalent equivalent MEM in early childhood education and three- and four-year-old students receiving special education services;
"cost differential factor" is the numerical expression of the ratio of the cost of a particular segment of the school program to the cost of the basic program in grades e e 17 four through six;
e e n d 18 E.
"department" or "division" means the public = = l ] 19 education department;
a l r i 20 F.
"early childhood education ADM" or "early t e a t childhood education MEM" means the full-time-equivalent MEM of m m 21 e d r e 22 students attending approved early childhood education programs;
c e r c 23 G.
"full-time-equivalent ADM" or "full-time-"full-time-equivalent e a n b 24 equivalent MEM" is that membership calculated by applying to u [ the MEM in an approved public school program the ratio of the .209436.1 - 2 - number of hours per school day devoted to the program to six hours or the number of hours per school week devoted to the program to thirty hours;
"program cost" is the product of the total number of program units to which a school district is SB 157 Page 2 entitled multiplied by the dollar value per program unit established by the legislature;
"program element" is that component of a public school system to which a cost differential factor is applied to determine the number of program units to which a school district is entitled, including [but not limited to ] MEM, full-full-time-equivalent time-equivalent MEM, teacher, classroom or public school;
"program unit" is the product of the program e e 17 element multiplied by the applicable cost differential factor;
e e n d 18 L.
"public money" or "public funds" means all money = = l ] 19 from public or private sources received by a school district or a l r i 20 state-chartered charter school or officer or employee of a t e a t school district or state-chartered charter school for public m m 21 e d r e 22 use;
c e r c 23 M.
"qualified student" means a public school e a n b 24 student who:
u [ (1) has not graduated from high school;
.209436.1 - 3 - (2) is regularly enrolled in one-half or more of the minimum course requirements approved by the department for public school students;
(b) is at least three years of age at SB 157 Page 3 any time during the school year and is receiving special education services pursuant to rules of the department;
[and ] N.
e e 17 (2) for fiscal year 2020, the weighted average e e n d 18 of the instructional staff training and experience index at = = l ] 19 seventy-five percent and the teacher cost index at twenty-five a l r i 20 percent;
t e a t (3) for fiscal year 2021, the weighted average m m 21 e d r e 22 of the instructional staff training and experience index at c e r c 23 fifty percent and the teacher cost index at fifty percent;
e a n b 24 (4) for fiscal year 2022, the weighted average u [ of the instructional staff training and experience index at .209436.1 - 4 - twenty-five percent and the teacher cost index at seventy-five percent;
and [N.] O.
"state superintendent" means the secretary 6 of public education or the secretary's designee." SB 157 Page 4 SECTION 2.
Each state-chartered charter school shall submit to the charter schools division of the department a school-school-based based budget.
[ForThe the first year of operation, the budget of every state-chartered charter school shall be basedsubmitted onto the projecteddivision numberfor ofapproval programor unitsamendment generatedpursuant byto that charter school and its students, using the at-riskPublic indexSchool andFinance theAct instructional staff training and experience index of the schoolCharter eSchools eAct. 17 district in which it is geographically located.
Show all 115 changed lines (75 more)
For second and e e n d 18 subsequent fiscal years of operation, the budgets of state- = = l ] 19 chartered charter schools shall be based on the number of a l r i 20 program units generated using the average of the MEM on the t e a t second and third reporting dates of the prior year and its own m m 21 e d r e 22 instructional staff training and experience index and the at- c e r c 23 risk index of the school district in which the state-chartered e a n b 24 charter school is geographically located.] The budget shall be u [ submitted to the division for approval or amendment pursuant to .209436.1 - 5 - the Public School Finance Act and the Charter Schools Act.
Each locally chartered charter school shall submit to the local school board a school-based budget [Forfor theapproval firstor yearamendment. of operation, the budget of every locally chartered charter school shall be based on the projected number of program units generated by the charter school and its students, using the at-risk index and the instructional staff training and experience index of the school district in which it is geographically located.
ForThe secondapproval andor subsequentamendment fiscalauthority years of operation, the budgetslocal ofschool locallyboard charteredrelative charterto schoolsthe shallcharter beschool basedbudget onis thelimited numberto ofensuring programthat unitssound generatedfiscal usingpractices theare averagefollowed ofin the MEMdevelopment on the second and third reporting dates of the priorbudget year and itsthat own instructional staff training and experience index and the at-riskcharter index of the school districtbudget eis ewithin 17 in which the locallyallotted charteredresources. charter school is geographically e e n d 18 located.
The budgetlocal school board shall behave submittedno toveto theauthority localover schoolindividual =line =items lwithin ]the 19charter board]school's forproposed approvalbudget, but shall approve or amendment.disapprove the budget in its entirety.
The approval or amendment a l r i 20 authority of the local school board relative to the charter t e a t school budget is limited to ensuring that sound fiscal m m 21 e d r e 22 practices are followed in the development of the budget and c e r c 23 that the charter school budget is within the allotted e a n b 24 resources.
The local school board shall have no veto authority u [ over individual line items within the charter school's proposed .209436.1 - 6 - budget, but shall approve or disapprove the budget in its entirety.
SB 157 Page 5 C.
For [the ] its first year of operation, [after a locally chartered charter school converts to a state-chartered charter school or a state-chartered charter school converts to a locally chartered charter school, the charter school's budget shall be based on the projected number of program units generated usingby the averageschool ofand theits MEMstudents onusing the secondat-risk index and thirdthe reportingstaffing datescost multiplier of the priorschool yeardistrict andin which the instructionalschool staffis traininglocated, and experiencethe indexschool's andbudget shall be adjusted using the at-riskqualified indexMEM ofon the schoolfirst districtreporting indate whichof itthe iscurrent geographicallyschool located.year.
For its second and subsequent fiscal years of operation, the charter school shall e e 17 follow the provisions of Subsection A or B of this section, as e e n d 18 applicable] a charter school's budget shall be based on the = = l ] 19 projected number of program units generated by the school and aits lstudents rusing ithe 20average itsof studentsthe usingMEM on the at-risksecond index and thethird staffingreporting costdates tof ethe aprior tyear, multiplierthe at-risk index of the school district in which the school is mlocated m 21 e d r e 22 located, and the school's budgetstaffing shallcost bemultiplier." adjustedSECTION using3. the c e r c 23 qualified MEM on the first reporting date of the current school e a n b 24 year.
For its second and subsequent fiscal years of operation, u [ a charter school's budget shall be based on the number of .209436.1 - 7 - program units generated by the school and its students using the average of the MEM on the second and third reporting dates of the prior year, the at-risk index of the school district in which the school is located and the school's staffing cost multiplier." 6 SECTION 3.
For fiscal year 20192019, , the total program units for the purpose of computing the program cost shall be calculated by multiplying the sum of the program units itemized as Paragraphs (1) through (6) in this subsection by the [instructional staff training and experience index ] staffing cost multiplier and adding the program units itemized as Paragraphs (7) through (14) in this subsection.
For fiscal e e 17 year 2020 and subsequent fiscal years, the total program units e e n d 18 for the purpose of computing the program cost shallSB be157 =Page =6 lshall ]be 19 calculated by multiplying the sum of the program units itemized a l r i 20 as Paragraphs (1) and (2) in this subsection by the staffing t e a t cost multiplier and adding the program units itemized as m m 21 e d r e 22 Paragraphs (3) through (14) in this subsection.
The itemized c e r c 23 program units are as follows:
e a n b 24 (1) early childhood education;
u [ (2) basic education;
.209436.1 - 8 - (3) special education, adjusted by subtracting the units derived from membership in class D special education programs in private, nonsectarian, nonprofit training centers;
e e 17 (13) home school student activities;
and eSB e157 nPage d7 18 (14) charter school student activities.
= = l ] 19 B.
The total program cost calculated as prescribed a l r i 20 in Subsection A of this section includes the cost of early t e a t childhood, special, bilingual multicultural, fine arts and m m 21 e d r e 22 vocational education and other remedial or enrichment programs.
c e r c 23 It is the responsibility of the local school board or, for a e a n b 24 charter school, the governing body of the charter school to u [ determine its priorities in terms of the needs of the community .209436.1 - 9 - served by that board.
A school district is eligible for additional eSB e157 17Page 8 program units if it establishes within its department-approved e e n d 18 educational plan identified services to assist students to = = l ] 19 reach their full academic potential.
A school district a l r i 20 receiving additional at-risk program units shall include a t e a t report of specified services implemented to improve the m m 21 e d r e 22 academic success of at-risk students.
The report shall c e r c 23 identify the ways in which the school district and individual e a n b 24 schools use funding generated through the at-risk index and the u [ intended outcomes.
For purposes of this section, "at-risk .209436.1 - 10 - student" means a student who meets the criteria to be included in the calculation of the three-year average total rate in Subsection B of this section.
(1) for fiscal year 20192019, , Three-Year Average Total Rate x [0.106 ] 0.130 = At-Risk Index;
and (3) for fiscal year 2021 and subsequent fiscalSB years,157 ePage e9 17fiscal years, Three-Year Average Total Rate x 0.150 = At-Risk Index.
e e n d 18 B.
To calculate the three-year average total rate, = = l ] 19 the department shall compute a three-year average of the school a l r i 20 district's percentage of membership used to determine its Title t e a t I allocation, a three-year average of the percentage of m m 21 e d r e 22 membership classified as English language learners using c e r c 23 criteria established by the federal office of civil rights and e a n b 24 a three-year average of the percentage of student mobility.
u [ The department shall then add the three-year average rates.
.209436.1 - 11 - The number obtained from this calculation is the three-year average total rate.
"[NEW"TEACHER MATERIAL] TEACHER COST INDEX--LICENSURE-EXPERIENCE FACTOR--REPORT.--FACTOR-- REPORT.-- A.
The teacher cost index for a school district or charter school in its second or subsequent year of operations is the greater of 1.0 or the average of the SB 157 Page 10 licensure-experience factors of all full-time-equivalent teachers on the school district's or e e 17 charter school's payroll in October of that year who are e e n d 18 assigned classroom teaching responsibilities.
The licensure-licensure-experience = = l ] 19 experience factor of a teacher corresponds to the teacher's a l r i 20 licensure level and years of experience and is as follows:
t e a t Licensure m m 21 e d r e 22 Level Years of Experience c e r c 23 0 to 2 3 to 5 6 to 8 9 to 15 Over 15 e a n b 24 1 0.755 0.785 0.800 u [ 2 0.994 1.023 1.050 1.123 .209436.1 - 12 - 3 1.184 1.208 1.277.
(1) data on the relationship of licensure-licensure-experience experience factors to actual teacher costs;
SB 157 Page 11 C.
(1) "licensure level" is the teaching licensure e e 17 level as defined in the School Personnel Act;
and e e n d 18 (2) "years of experience" is as defined by = = l ] 19 department rule." a l r i 20 SECTION 6.
Section 22-8-25 NMSA 1978 (being Laws 1981, t e a t Chapter 176, Section 5, as amended) is amended to read:
m m 21 e d r e 22 "22-8-25.
STATE EQUALIZATION GUARANTEE DISTRIBUTION-- c e r c 23 DEFINITIONS--DETERMINATION OF AMOUNT.-- e a n b 24 A.
The state equalization guarantee distribution is u [ that amount of money distributed to each school district to .209436.1 - 13 - ensure that its operating revenue, including its local and federal revenues as defined in this section, is at least equal to the school district's program cost.
For state-state-chartered chartered charter schools, the state equalization guarantee distribution is the difference between the state-chartered charter school's program cost and the two percent withheld by the department for administrative services.
"Local revenue", as used in this section, means seventy-five percent of receipts to the school district derived from that amount produced by a school district property tax applied at the rate of fifty cents ($.50) to each one thousand dollars ($1,000) of net taxable value of property allocated to the school district and to the assessed SB 157 Page 12 value of products severed and sold in the school district as determined under the Oil and Gas Ad Valorem Production Tax Act and upon the assessed value of equipment in the school district as determined under e e 17 the Oil and Gas Production Equipment Ad Valorem Tax Act.
e e n d 18 C.
"Federal revenue", as used in this section, = = l ] 19 means receipts to the school district or state-chartered a l r i 20 charter school, excluding amounts that, if taken into account t e a t in the computation of the state equalization guarantee m m 21 e d r e 22 distribution, result, under federal law or regulations, in a c e r c 23 reduction in or elimination of federal school funding otherwise e a n b 24 receivable by the school district, derived from the following:
u [ (1) seventy-five percent of the school .209436.1 - 14 - district's share of forest reserve funds distributed in accordance with Section 22-8-33 NMSA 1978;
(1) calculate the number of program units to which each school district or charter school is entitled SB 157 Page 13 using an average of the MEM on the second and third reporting dates of the prior year;
or (2) calculate the number of program units to which a school district or charter school operating under an approved year-round school calendar is entitled using an e e 17 average of the MEM on appropriate dates established by the e e n d 18 department;
or = = l ] 19 (3) calculate the number of program units to a l r i 20 which a school district or charter school with a MEM of two t e a t hundred or less is entitled by using an average of the MEM on m m 21 e d r e 22 the second and third reporting dates of the prior year or the c e r c 23 fortieth day of the current year, whichever is greater;
and e a n b 24 (4) using the results of the calculations in u [ Paragraph (1), (2) or (3) of this subsection and the .209436.1 - 15 - [instructional staff training and experience index ] staffing cost multiplier from the October report of the prior school year, establish a total program cost of the school district or charter school;
(7) deduct the total amount of guaranteed energy savings contract payments that the department SB 157 Page 14 determines will be made to the school district from the public school utility conservation fund during the fiscal year for which the state equalization guarantee distribution is being computed;
and (8) deduct ninety percent of the amount e e 17 certified for the school district by the department pursuant to e e n d 18 the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Bonding Act.
= = l ] 19 E.
Reduction of a school district's state a l r i 20 equalization guarantee distribution shall cease when the school t e a t district's cumulative reductions equal its proportional share m m 21 e d r e 22 of the cumulative debt service payments necessary to service c e r c 23 the bonds issued pursuant to the Energy Efficiency and e a n b 24 Renewable Energy Bonding Act.
u [ F.
The amount of the state equalization guarantee .209436.1 - 16 - distribution to which a school district is entitled is the balance remaining after the deductions made in Paragraphs (6) through (8) of Subsection D of this section.
In the event that a school district or charter school has received more state equalization guarantee SB 157 Page 15 funds than its entitlement, a refund shall be made by the school district or charter school to the state general fund." SECTION 7.
Using funds appropriated by the legislature for e e 17 fiscal years 2020 through 2022, the public education department e e n d 18 shall supplement a school district's or charter school's = = l ] 19 calculated program cost in each of those fiscal years:
a l r i 20 (1) if, for the fiscal year, the school t e a t district's or charter school's calculated program cost is less m m 21 e d r e 22 than its final program cost in the previous fiscal year, not c e r c 23 considering any supplement the school district or charter e a n b 24 school receives under this subsection;
and u [ (2) as follows:
.209436.1 - 17 - (a) for fiscal year 2020, in an amount equal to one hundred percent of the reduction attributable to the implementation of this act or the difference between the calculated program cost and the final program cost in the previous fiscal year, whichever is less;
and SB 157 Page 16 (c) for fiscal year 2022, in an amount equal to fifty percent of the reduction attributable to the implementation of this act or the difference between the calculated program cost and the final program cost in the previous fiscal year, whichever is less;
but (3) if, in a fiscal year, the appropriation for e e 17 the purpose of implementing this subsection is insufficient to e e n d 18 supplement school districts and charter schools in accordance = = l ] 19 with Paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection, then in an a l r i 20 amount equal to the school district's or charter school's t e a t prorated share of the total appropriation.
m m 21 e d r e 22 B.
On or before February 1 of 2020 through 2022, c e r c 23 the public education department shall submit a report to the e a n b 24 legislative education study committee and the legislative u [ finance committee that states, regarding the current fiscal .209436.1 - 18 - year:
SB 157 Page 17 SECTION 8.
APPROPRIATION.--Twenty-twoREPEAL.--Section million22-8-46 fiveNMSA hundred1978 forty-one(being thousandLaws four2005, hundredChapter dollars49, ($22,541,400)Section is1, appropriatedas fromamended) theis generalrepealed. fund to the state equalization guarantee distribution for expenditure in fiscal year 2019 to offset the rise in costs from the increase in the at-risk index effected by this act.
AnySECTION unexpended9. or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of fiscal year 2019 shall revert to the general fund.
eEFFECTIVE eDATE.--The 17effective SECTIONdate 9.of the provisions of this act is July 1, 2018.
REPEAL.--SectionSB 22-8-46157 NMSAPage 1978 (being Laws e e n d 18 2005,6 Chapter8 49,25 Section 1, as amended) is repealed.
= = l ] 19 SECTION 10.
EFFECTIVE DATE.--The effective date of the a l r i 20 provisions of this act is July 1, 2018.
t e a t - 19 - m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .209436.1
Show all 115 changed rows (75 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
This bill amends the Public School Finance Act to establish a phased-in teacher cost index and adjusts the at-risk index while repealing the funding formula study task force.
-
Section 22-8-2 NMSA 1978
establish a phased-in teacher cost index;
This introduces a new teacher cost index into the Public School Finance Act.
-
Section 22-8-6.1 NMSA 1978
requiring a study to evaluate the index's sufficiency;
This mandates a study to assess how effective the new teacher cost index is.
-
Section 22-8-23.3 NMSA 1978
making a phased-in adjustment to the at-risk index;
This allows for gradual changes to the at-risk index over time.
-
the section of law creating the funding formula study task force.This removes the task force that was previously responsible for studying the funding formula.
Action History
-
Pocket Veto
-
passed House
-
withdrawn from committee
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Education Committee & House Appropriations and Finance Committee
-
passed Senate
-
DO PASS, as amended, committee report adopted
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
germane
-
Sent to Senate Committees' Committee & Senate Education Committee & Senate Finance Committee
Sponsors
- Howie C. Morales · Primary
- Dennis J. Roch · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 110 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Morales, Howie C.
- Roch, Dennis J.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (110)
110 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 110 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 38 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democrat | 16 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 64 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (70)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Smith | — | Yea |
| Salazar, Nick | — | Yea |
| Salazar, Tomás | — | Yea |
| Gonzales | — | Yea |
| Maestas Barnes | — | Yea |
| Garcia Richard | — | Yea |
| Martmnez, Javier | — | Yea |
| Rehm | — | Yea |
| Garcma, M.P. | — | Not Voting |
| Adkins | — | Yea |
| Alcon | — | Yea |
| Baldonado | — | Yea |
| Bandy | — | Yea |
| Chasey | — | Yea |
| Clahchischilliage | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Not Voting |
| Crowder | — | Yea |
| Dines | — | Yea |
| Dodge | — | Yea |
| Egolf | — | Yea |
| Ely | — | Yea |
| Fajardo | — | Yea |
| Gentry | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Herrell | — | Yea |
| Larrañaga | — | Yea |
| Lewis | — | Yea |
| Louis | — | Not Voting |
| McCamley | — | Yea |
| Nibert | — | Yea |
| Powdrell-Culbert | — | Yea |
| Roch | — | Yea |
| Rodella | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Ruiloba | — | Yea |
| Stapleton | — | Yea |
| Strickler | — | Yea |
| Sweetser | — | Yea |
| Wooley | — | Yea |
| Youngblood | — | Yea |
| Angelica Rubio | Democrat | Yea |
| Antonio Maestas | Democrat | Yea |
| Charlotte Little | Democrat | Yea |
| D. Wonda Johnson | Democrat | Yea |
| Debra M. Sariñana | Democrat | Yea |
| Derrick J. Lente | Democrat | Yea |
| Doreen Y. Gallegos | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Elizabeth "Liz" Thomson | Democrat | Yea |
| Joanne J. Ferrary | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Linda M. Trujillo | Democrat | Yea |
| Martha Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Matthew McQueen | Democrat | Yea |
| Nathan P. Small | Democrat | Yea |
| Patricia A. Lundstrom | Democrat | Yea |
| Patricia Roybal Caballero | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Alan T. Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Candy Spence Ezzell | Republican | Yea |
| Cathrynn N. Brown | Republican | Yea |
| David M. Gallegos | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gail Armstrong | Republican | Yea |
| Gail Armstrong | Republican | Yea |
| James G. Townsend | Republican | Yea |
| Larry R. Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Rebecca Dow | Republican | Yea |
| Rod Montoya | Republican | Yea |
| William A. Hall II | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democrat | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (42)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| CANDELARIA | — | Yea |
| PAPEN | — | Yea |
| KERNAN | — | Yea |
| INGLE | — | Yea |
| SAPIEN | — | Yea |
| O'NEILL | — | Yea |
| GOULD | — | Yea |
| RUE | — | Yea |
| PIRTLE | — | Yea |
| MOORES | — | Yea |
| WHITE | — | Yea |
| PAYNE | — | Yea |
| LEAVELL | — | Yea |
| SMITH | — | Yea |
| IVEY-SOTO | — | Yea |
| SANCHEZ | — | Yea |
| CISNEROS | — | Yea |
| RODRIGUEZ | — | Yea |
| MORALES | — | Yea |
| TALLMAN | — | Yea |
| McSORLEY | — | Not Voting |
| NEVILLE | — | Not Voting |
| BURT | — | Not Voting |
| GRIGGS | — | Not Voting |
| ORTIZ y PINO | — | Yea |
| Antoinette Sedillo Lopez | Democrat | Yea |
| Benny Shendo, Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Elizabeth "Liz" Stefanics | Democrat | Yea |
| George K. Muñoz | Democrat | Yea |
| Jeff Steinborn | Democrat | Yea |
| Joseph Cervantes | Democrat | Yea |
| Michael Padilla | Democrat | Yea |
| Mimi Stewart | Democrat | Yea |
| Pete Campos | Democrat | Yea |
| Peter Wirth | Democrat | Yea |
| Shannon D. Pinto | Democrat | Yea |
| William P. Soules | Democrat | Yea |
| Alan T. Martinez | Republican | Yea |
| Brian G. Baca | Republican | Yea |
| Craig W. Brandt | Republican | Yea |
| Pat Woods | Republican | Yea |
| William E. Sharer | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 157?
- SB 157 is sponsored by Morales, Howie C. and Roch, Dennis J..
- What is the current status of SB 157?
- This bill died with 2018 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 157?
- Track SB 157 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 157
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 157
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →