AG OPINION ON PUBLIC MONEY FOR PRIVATE ROAD
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HM 62 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HM 62.
You're tracking HM 62
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HM 62 — AG OPINION ON PUBLIC MONEY FOR PRIVATE ROAD
Last action — Signed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2018. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
23 added · 68 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of House Memorial 62 now includes a clearer request to the Attorney General to evaluate whether public funds can be used to improve or maintain private roads that serve public welfare purposes. This change highlights the concern about private roads deteriorating in housing developments and their potential hazards to community health and safety. By focusing on this issue, the memorial aims to address the implications for residents' well-being and local economies, making it important for lawmakers to understand how public funding might legally support these needs.
HOUSEA MEMORIAL 62REQUESTING 53RDTHE LEGISLATUREATTORNEY -GENERAL STATETO OFISSUE NEWAN MEXICOOPINION -WHETHER SECONDPUBLIC SESSIONMONEY ,MAY 2018BE INTRODUCEDUSED BYTO NathanREHABILITATE P.OR MAINTAIN A PRIVATE ROAD FOR PUBLIC WELFARE PURPOSES.
Small 6 8WHEREAS, 10numerous Aprivate MEMORIALhousing REQUESTINGdevelopments THEoutside ATTORNEYof GENERALmunicipal TOjurisdictions ISSUEhave ANbeen OPINIONbuilt WHETHERover PUBLICthe MONEYyears MAYwithin BENew USEDMexico; TO REHABILITATE OR MAINTAIN A PRIVATE ROAD FOR PUBLIC WELFARE PURPOSES.
15and WHEREAS, numerousin privatesome housingcases the roads to these developments outsidehave deteriorated, or are at risk of municipaldeterioration jurisdictionsto havethe beenpoint builtwhere overthey pose a hazard to public welfare, including the yearshealth withinand eeducation tof 17local Newresidents Mexico;and the economy of the community;
andNOW, wTHEREFORE, lBE nIT dRESOLVED 18BY WHEREAS,THE inHOUSE someOF casesREPRESENTATIVES theOF roadsTHE toSTATE theseOF developmentsNEW =MEXICO =that 19the aattorney lgeneral havebe deteriorated,requested orto aredraft atan riskopinion ofon deteriorationwhether, toand thein pointwhich icircumstance, athe econstitution rof 20New whereMexico theyallows posepublic amoney hazard to publicbe welfare,used includingfor the arehabilitation tor mmaintenance m 21 health and education of locala residentsprivate androad thefor economypublic ofwelfare thepurposes; d r e 22 community;
cand e s k 23 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BYthat THEcopies HOUSEof OFthis ememorial abe nHM b62 24Page REPRESENTATIVES1 OFtransmitted THEto STATE OF NEW MEXICO that the attorney u [ general be requested to draft an opinion on whether, and in .209132.2 which circumstance, the constitution of New Mexico allows public money to be used for the rehabilitationgovernor. or maintenance of a private road for public welfare purposes;
and25 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this memorial be transmitted to the attorney general and to the governor.
6 - 2 - 8 10 12 14 16 e e 17 e e n d 18 = = l ] 19 a l r i 20 t e a t m m 21 e d r e 22 c e r c 23 e a n b 24 u [ .209132.2
View plain text versions (2)
- Final Version View text Current pdf
- Introduced introduced version pdf
Action History
-
Signed
-
passed House
-
DO PASS committee report adopted
-
Sent to House Transportation, Public Works and Capital Improvements Committee
Sponsors
- Nathan P. Small · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Nathan P. Small Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HM 62?
- HM 62 is sponsored by Nathan P. Small (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HM 62?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2018. Enacted.
- Where can I track HM 62?
- Track HM 62 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HM 62
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HM 62
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →