Creates provisions relating to privileged communications in criminal matters
The bill proposes new rules related to communications considered privileged in criminal cases. Specific details and requirements are not available.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 312 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 312.
You're tracking SB 312
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 312 — Creates provisions relating to privileged communications in criminal matters
Last action — Voted Do Pass S Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
In plain language
This bill creates provisions for privileged communications in criminal matters.
The bill proposes new rules related to communications considered privileged in criminal cases. Specific details and requirements are not available.
Summary
Creates provisions relating to privileged communications in criminal matters
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SB 312 on the official Missouri source →Action History
-
Voted Do Pass S Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee
-
Hearing Conducted S Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee
-
Second Read and Referred S Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee
-
S First Read
-
Prefiled
Sponsors
- Steven Roberts · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 198 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (198)
198 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 198 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 312 do?
- Creates provisions relating to privileged communications in criminal matters
- Who sponsors SB 312?
- SB 312 is sponsored by Steven Roberts.
- What is the current status of SB 312?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 312?
- Track SB 312 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 312
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 312
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →