Illinois 96th Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 D cosponsors

SB 458 — REVENUE-TECH

Last action — Session Sine Die

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 96th Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Amends the Property Tax Code. Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the definition of "33 1/3%".

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

73 added · 22 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended bill SB 458 introduces a new section to the Property Tax Code, allowing local boards of review to negotiate property assessments with taxpayers. This change enables discussions about revised property assessments to occur before or after a taxpayer officially appeals to the Property Tax Appeal Board. Importantly, if the proposed revised assessment involves a significant value reduction (over $100,000), the board must notify all relevant taxing districts before finalizing the agreement. This change aims to streamline the appeal process and foster more direct communication between taxpayers and review boards, which could lead to faster resolutions.

→
Previous
Latest
SB0458 *LRB09606514RCE16598b* 96TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY State of Illinois and 2010 SB0458 Introduced 2/6/2009, by Sen.
SB0458 Engrossed LRB096 06514 RCE 16598 b AN ACT concerning revenue.
John J.
Cullerton SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
ILCS 200/1-55 Amends the Property Tax Code.
Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the definition of "33 1/3%".
LRB096 06514 RCE 16598 b A BILL FOR SB0458 LRB096 06514 RCE 16598 b AN ACT concerning revenue.
The Property Tax Code is amended by changing Section 1-55 as follows:
The Property Tax Code is amended by adding Section 16-181 as follows:
(35 ILCS 200/1-55) Sec.
(35 ILCS 200/16-181 new) Sec.
1-55.
16-181.
33 1/3%.
Stipulation to revised assessment.
One-third of the the fair cash value of property, as determined by the Department's sales ratio studies for the 3 most recent years preceding the assessment year, adjusted to take into account any changes in assessment levels implemented since the data for the studies were collected.
The board of review whose decision is being appealed may, at its discretion, enter into discussions with a taxpayer aimed at achieving a stipulated revised assessment upon the property, either prior to or after receipt of the taxpayer's petition from the Property Tax Appeal Board.
(Source:
If such discussions commence prior to the board of review's receipt of the taxpayer's petition from the Property Tax Appeal Board, the taxpayer shall provide the board of review with such evidence of the taxpayer's timely filing of its appeal before the Property Tax Appeal Board as the board of review may request, including but not limited to a copy of the taxpayer's petition as filed with the Property Tax Appeal Board.
P.A.
If, after discussions have been entered into, the taxpayer and the board of review propose to stipulate to a revised assessment of the property, and if the original complaint requested a reduction in assessed value of more than $100,000, then the board of SB0458 Engrossed - 2 - LRB096 06514 RCE 16598 b review shall first serve a copy of the proposed stipulation or assessment agreement on all taxing districts as shown on the last available property tax bill, along with a copy of the taxpayer's petition as provided to the board of review and all other evidence used to reach the settlement.
86-1481;
The taxing districts so served shall have a period of 45 days after the postmark date of the notice from the board of review to file a written objection to the proposal with the board of review.
87-877;
Failure of a taxing district to object to the proposed assessment within the 45-day objection period shall be considered acceptance of the proposed assessment.
88-455.)
Upon the later of (i) the expiration of the 45-day objection period or (ii) written resolution of any timely filed written objection received from a taxing district, the board of review shall provide the proposed stipulation or assessment agreement to the Property Tax Appeal Board along with a certificate of service affirming that all taxing districts have been notified of the proposed stipulation or assessment agreement, and that no timely written objections to the stipulation or assessment agreement have been received or that any such objections have been fully resolved.
The certificate of service shall be signed by a member of the board of review or the clerk of the board of review.
Within 120 days after the Property Tax Appeal Board's receipt of the stipulation or assessment agreement and certificate of service, the Property Tax Appeal Board shall issue a decision in accordance with the stipulation or SB0458 Engrossed - 3 - LRB096 06514 RCE 16598 b assessment agreement, unless it finds that the Property Tax Appeal Board lacks jurisdiction over the appeal or that the stipulation or assessment agreement is against the manifest weight of the evidence.
If the board of review provides notice to the affected taxing districts of the proposed stipulation or assessment agreement, and a taxing district (i) does not respond to the notice, (ii) accepts the proposed assessment, or (iii) reaches a written resolution with the board of review and the taxpayer, then the board of review is not required to otherwise send notice as required by Section 16-180 of the Property Tax Code to that taxing district, and that taxing district is precluded from intervening or otherwise participating in the appeal pending before the Property Tax Appeal Board challenging the assessment.
If a taxing district files a written objection to the proposal to the board of review which is not followed by a written resolution, then the appeal shall proceed as provided by law, the board of review must notify that taxing district as required by Section 16-180, and any proposed stipulation or assessment agreement shall not be considered or introduced as evidence in any proceeding before the Property Tax Appeal Board.
Section 99.
Effective date.
This Act takes effect upon becoming law.
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Session Sine Die

  2. Referred to Rules Committee

  3. First Reading

  4. Chief House Sponsor Rep. Barbara Flynn Currie

  5. Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading

  6. Arrived in House

  7. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 5-4(a)

  8. Third Reading - Passed; 051-000-000

  9. 3/5 Vote Required

  10. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading

  11. Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Adopted; Koehler

  12. Recalled to Second Reading

  13. Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Be Approved for Consideration Assignments

  14. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading December 2, 2010

  15. Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Adopted; Koehler

  16. Recalled to Second Reading

  17. Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Referred to Assignments

  18. Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Filed with Secretary by Sen. David Koehler

  19. Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Recommend Do Adopt Revenue; 007-000-000

  20. Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Assignments Refers to Revenue

  21. Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Referred to Assignments

  22. Senate Floor Amendment No. 2 Filed with Secretary by Sen. David Koehler

  23. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Postponed - Revenue

  24. Rule 2-10 Committee/3rd Reading Deadline Established As January 11, 2011

  25. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Assignments Refers to Revenue

  26. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Referred to Assignments

  27. Senate Floor Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. David Koehler

  28. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading November 17, 2010

  29. Approved for Consideration Assignments

  30. Chief Sponsor Changed to Sen. David Koehler

  31. Pursuant to Senate Rule 3-9(b) / Referred to Assignments

  32. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading April 28, 2009

  33. Second Reading

  34. Rule 2-10 Third Reading Deadline Established As April 30, 2009

  35. Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 17, 2009

  36. Do Pass Executive; 012-000-000

  37. Assigned to Executive

  38. Referred to Assignments

  39. First Reading

  40. Filed with Secretary by Sen. John J. Cullerton

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (182)

182 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 182 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Third Reading

Passed 51 Yea · 0 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 9000
Unaffiliated 41008
Republican 1000
Total 51008
% of votes cast 86%0%0%14%
How each member voted (59)
Member Party Vote
Hultgren — Not Voting
Cullerton — Yea
Kotowski — Yea
Lauzen — Yea
Meeks — Not Voting
Radogno — Yea
Schoenberg — Not Voting
Trotter — Not Voting
Wilhelmi — Yea
Duffy — Yea
Forby — Yea
Garrett — Not Voting
Link — Yea
Luechtefeld — Yea
McCarter — Yea
Millner — Yea
Mulroe — Yea
Muñoz — Yea
Noland — Yea
Silverstein — Yea
Steans — Yea
Viverito — Yea
Brady — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Jacobs — Yea
Jones, J. — Yea
Demuzio — Yea
Clayborne — Yea
Crotty — Yea
Dahl — Yea
Frerichs — Yea
Haine — Yea
Hendon — Yea
Hutchinson — Yea
Pankau — Not Voting
Raoul — Yea
Righter — Yea
Risinger — Yea
Rutherford — Not Voting
Sandack — Yea
Sandoval — Yea
Maloney — Yea
Althoff — Yea
Martinez — Yea
Bivins — Yea
Bomke — Yea
Bond — Yea
Burzynski — Yea
Dillard — Not Voting
David Koehler Democrat Yea
Don Harmon Democrat Yea
Emil Jones, III Democrat Yea
Eva-Dina Delgado Democrat Yea
Kimberly A. Lightford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Laura M. Murphy Democrat Yea
Linda Holmes Democrat Yea
Mattie Hunter Democrat Yea
Dave Syverson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation housing technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 458 do?
Amends the Property Tax Code. Makes a technical change in a Section concerning the definition of "33 1/3%".
Who sponsors SB 458?
SB 458 is sponsored by David Koehler (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 458?
This bill died with 96th Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 458?
Track SB 458 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 458

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 458

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →