Illinois 96th Regular Session Status: Enacted

HB 466 — MUNI CD-ANNEXATION

Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 96-0163

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 04, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    0 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Amends the Illinois Municipal Code. Provides that property that is located in Champaign County and is the subject of an annexation agreement is subject to the ordinances, control, and jurisdiction of the annexing municipality if the property is located (i) within 1.5 miles of the corporate boundaries of the municipality or (ii) more than 1.5 miles from the corporate boundaries of the municipality unless the county board retains jurisdiction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

3 added · 3 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill HB 466 has been updated to include additional lines of content while removing some previous lines. This change is significant because it reflects new information or clarifications that may impact how the bill is understood and implemented. Such revisions help ensure that the bill accurately addresses the issues it aims to solve and aligns with current needs or policies.

→
Previous
Latest
HB0466 Engrossed LRB096 04601 RLJ 14658 b AN ACT concerning local government.
HB0466 Enrolled LRB096 04601 RLJ 14658 b AN ACT concerning local government.
(b) This Section shall not apply in (i) a county with a population of more than 3,000,000, (ii) a county that borders a county with a population of more than 3,000,000 or (iii) a county with a population of more than 246,000 according to the 1990 federal census and bordered by the Mississippi River, unless the parties to the annexation agreement have, at the time the agreement is signed, ownership or control of all property that would make the property that is the subject of the agreement contiguous to the annexing municipality, in which HB0466 Engrossed - 2 - LRB096 04601 RLJ 14658 b case the property that is the subject of the annexation agreement is subject to the ordinances, control, and jurisdiction of the municipality in all respects the same as property owned by the municipality that lies within its corporate limits.
(b) This Section shall not apply in (i) a county with a population of more than 3,000,000, (ii) a county that borders a county with a population of more than 3,000,000 or (iii) a county with a population of more than 246,000 according to the 1990 federal census and bordered by the Mississippi River, unless the parties to the annexation agreement have, at the time the agreement is signed, ownership or control of all property that would make the property that is the subject of the agreement contiguous to the annexing municipality, in which HB0466 Enrolled - 2 - LRB096 04601 RLJ 14658 b case the property that is the subject of the annexation agreement is subject to the ordinances, control, and jurisdiction of the municipality in all respects the same as property owned by the municipality that lies within its corporate limits.
If the property is located more than 1.5 miles from the corporate boundaries of the annexing municipality, that property is subject to the ordinances, control, and jurisdiction of the annexing municipality unless the county board retains jurisdiction by the affirmative vote HB0466 Engrossed - 3 - LRB096 04601 RLJ 14658 b of two-thirds of its members.
If the property is located more than 1.5 miles from the corporate boundaries of the annexing municipality, that property is subject to the ordinances, control, and jurisdiction of the annexing municipality unless the county board retains jurisdiction by the affirmative vote HB0466 Enrolled - 3 - LRB096 04601 RLJ 14658 b of two-thirds of its members.
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Public Act . . . . . . . . . 96-0163

  2. Effective Date January 1, 2010

  3. Governor Approved

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. Passed Both Houses

  6. Third Reading - Passed; 057-000-000

  7. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading May 12, 2009

  8. Second Reading

  9. Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading April 30, 2009

  10. Do Pass Local Government; 009-000-000

  11. Assigned to Local Government

  12. Referred to Assignments

  13. First Reading

  14. Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. Michael W. Frerichs

  15. Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading

  16. Arrive in Senate

  17. Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 081-033-002

  18. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate

  19. Second Reading - Short Debate

  20. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate

  21. Do Pass / Short Debate Cities & Villages Committee; 007-001-000

  22. Assigned to Cities & Villages Committee

  23. Referred to Rules Committee

  24. First Reading

  25. Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Naomi D. Jakobsson

Sponsors

  • Naomi D. Jakobsson · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on · 6 voted No

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Naomi D. Jakobsson

Not signed on (182)

182 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 182 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Third Reading

Passed 57 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 9000
Unaffiliated 47002
Republican 1000
Total 57002
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (59)
Member Party Vote
Hutchinson — Yea
McCarter — Yea
Schoenberg — Yea
Demuzio — Yea
Jacobs — Yea
Kotowski — Yea
Lauzen — Not Voting
Link — Yea
Munoz — Yea
Jones, J. — Yea
Luechtefeld — Yea
Brady — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Millner — Yea
Noland — Yea
Pankau — Yea
Radogno — Yea
Silverstein — Yea
Steans — Yea
Trotter — Yea
Cullerton — Yea
Viverito — Yea
Wilhelmi — Yea
Clayborne — Yea
Cronin — Yea
Crotty — Yea
Dahl — Yea
DeLeo — Yea
Dillard — Yea
Duffy — Yea
Forby — Yea
Frerichs — Yea
Garrett — Yea
Haine — Yea
Hendon — Yea
Hultgren — Yea
Raoul — Yea
Righter — Yea
Risinger — Yea
Rutherford — Yea
Sandoval — Yea
Maloney — Yea
Althoff — Yea
Martinez — Yea
Bivins — Yea
Bomke — Yea
Bond — Yea
Burzynski — Not Voting
Meeks — Yea
David Koehler Democrat Yea
Don Harmon Democrat Yea
Emil Jones, III Democrat Yea
Eva-Dina Delgado Democrat Yea
Kimberly A. Lightford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Laura M. Murphy Democrat Yea
Linda Holmes Democrat Yea
Mattie Hunter Democrat Yea
Dave Syverson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Third Reading

Passed 81 Yea · 33 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 722803
Democrat 8300
Republican 1201
Total 813304
% of votes cast 69%28%0%3%
How each member voted (118)
Member Party Vote
Hatcher — Yea
Jackson — Yea
Lang — Yea
Mathias — Yea
McAuliffe — Yea
Davis, Monique — Yea
Reitz — Yea
Lyons — Yea
Dugan — Yea
Dunkin — Yea
Eddy — Yea
Flowers — Yea
Jefferson — Yea
Bradley — Yea
McGuire — Yea
Madigan — Yea
Brady — Yea
McAsey — Nay
Sullivan — Yea
Burke — Yea
Mell — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Gordon, Careen — Yea
Myers — Nay
Nekritz — Yea
Pihos — Yea
Senger — Nay
Hannig — Yea
Harris — Yea
Sommer — Nay
Hernandez — Yea
Soto — Yea
Thapedi — Yea
Howard — Yea
Tryon — Yea
Turner — Yea
Verschoore — Yea
Wait — Yea
Washington — Yea
Winters — Yea
Yarbrough — Yea
Zalewski — Yea
Mitchell, Bill — Nay
Mitchell, Jerry — Nay
Gordon, Jehan — Nay
Cavaletto — Nay
Coladipietro — Yea
Cole — Yea
Cross — Yea
Cultra — Yea
D'Amico — Yea
Durkin — Nay
Flider — Nay
Fortner — Yea
Fritchey — Nay
Froehlich — Nay
Graham — Yea
Hamos — Yea
Holbrook — Yea
Jakobsson — Yea
Kosel — Nay
Watson — Nay
Mulligan — Not Voting
Osterman — Nay
Colvin — Not Voting
Connelly — Nay
Coulson — Nay
Osmond — Nay
Phelps — Yea
Poe — Yea
Pritchard — Yea
Ramey — Yea
Reboletti — Nay
Reis — Nay
Riley — Yea
Ryg — Yea
Sacia — Yea
Saviano — Yea
Schmitz — Nay
Leitch — Nay
Acevedo — Yea
Arroyo — Yea
Bassi — Yea
Beaubien — Yea
Beiser — Yea
Bellock — Yea
Berrios — Yea
Biggins — Yea
Mautino — Yea
Black — Yea
Boland — Not Voting
May — Yea
Bost — Nay
Brauer — Yea
Brosnahan — Nay
Burns — Yea
McCarthy — Nay
Moffitt — Yea
Farnham — Nay
Currie — Yea
Franks — Nay
Golar — Yea
Chapa LaVia — Nay
Anthony DeLuca Democrat Yea
Fred Crespo Democrat Nay
Jay Hoffman Democrat Yea
La Shawn K. Ford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Mark L. Walker Democrat Nay
Nicholas K. Smith Democrat Yea
Patrick J. Joyce Democrat Nay
Robert "Bob" Rita Democrat Yea
Sara Feigenholtz Democrat Yea
William "Will" Davis Democrat Yea
Brad Stephens Republican Yea
Chapin Rose Republican Not Voting
Chris Miller Republican Nay
Jil Tracy Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

housing
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 466 do?
Amends the Illinois Municipal Code. Provides that property that is located in Champaign County and is the subject of an annexation agreement is subject to the ordinances, control, and jurisdiction of the annexing municipality if the property is located (i) within 1.5 miles of the corporate boundaries of the municipality or (ii) more than 1.5 miles from the corporate boundaries of the municipality unless the county board retains jurisdiction.
Who sponsors HB 466?
HB 466 is sponsored by Naomi D. Jakobsson.
What is the current status of HB 466?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 04, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 466?
Track HB 466 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 466

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 466

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →