Illinois 96th Regular Session Status: Enacted

SB 89 — PROP TX-PETROCHEMICAL VALUE

Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 96-0609

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    0 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 4 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Amends the Property Tax Code. Provides that a Section authorizing property tax assessment settlement agreements also applies to petrochemical processing facilities located within a county of less than 1,000,000 inhabitants. Effective immediately.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

62 added · 56 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to SB 89 broaden the types of facilities eligible for real property tax assessment settlement agreements. Specifically, they now include properties used for natural gas extraction and fractionation, as well as olefin and polymer manufacturing, and allow for litigation status to be considered if it was pending as of January 1, 2003. This change matters because it provides more property owners in smaller counties with an avenue to resolve tax disputes, potentially resulting in financial relief and clearer regulations regarding their tax assessments.

→
Previous
Latest
SB0089 Engrossed LRB096 03891 HLH 13926 b AN ACT concerning revenue.
SB0089 Enrolled LRB096 03891 HLH 13926 b AN ACT concerning revenue.
Index numbers shall be assigned by the county clerk in SB0089 Engrossed - 2 - LRB096 03891 HLH 13926 b counties of 3,000,000 or more inhabitants, and, at the direction of the county board in counties with less than 3,000,000 inhabitants, shall be assigned by the chief county assessment officer or recorder.
Index numbers shall be assigned by the county clerk in SB0089 Enrolled - 2 - LRB096 03891 HLH 13926 b counties of 3,000,000 or more inhabitants, and, at the direction of the county board in counties with less than 3,000,000 inhabitants, shall be assigned by the chief county assessment officer or recorder.
Any real property used for a (i) power generating, (ii) or automotive manufacturing, (iii) natural gas extraction and fractionation, or (iv) petrochemical processing facility located within a county of less than 1,000,000 inhabitants, as to which litigation with respect to its assessed valuation is pending or was pending as of January 1, 1993, may be the subject of a real property tax assessment settlement agreement among the taxpayer and taxing districts in which it is situated.
Any real property used for a power generating or automotive manufacturing facility located within a county of less than 1,000,000 inhabitants, as to which litigation with respect to its assessed valuation is pending or was pending as of January 1, 1993, may be the subject of a real property tax assessment settlement agreement among the taxpayer and taxing districts in which it is situated.
Other appropriate authorities, which may include county and State boards or officials, may also be parties to such an agreement.
In addition, any real property that is (i) used for natural gas extraction and fractionation or olefin and polymer manufacturing and (ii) located within a county of less than 1,000,000 inhabitants may be the subject of a real property tax assessment settlement agreement among the taxpayer and taxing districts in which the property is situated if litigation is or was pending as to its assessed valuation as of January 1, 2003 or thereafter.
Such an agreement may include the assessment of the facility for any years in dispute as well as for up to 10 years in the future.
Other appropriate authorities, which may include county and State boards or SB0089 Enrolled - 3 - LRB096 03891 HLH 13926 b officials, may also be parties to such agreements an agreement.
Such an agreement may provide for the settlement of issues relating to the assessed value of the facility and may provide for related payments, refunds, claims, SB0089 Engrossed - 3 - LRB096 03891 HLH 13926 b credits against taxes and liabilities in respect to past and future taxes of taxing districts, including any fund created under Section 20-35 of this Act, all implementing the settlement agreement.
Such agreements an agreement may include the assessment of the facility or property for any years in dispute as well as for up to 10 years in the future.
Such agreements an agreement may provide for the settlement of issues relating to the assessed value of the facility and may provide for related payments, refunds, claims, credits against taxes and liabilities in respect to past and future taxes of taxing districts, including any fund created under Section 20-35 of this Act, all implementing the settlement agreement.
No referendum approval or appropriation shall be required for such an agreement or such credits and any such obligation shall not constitute indebtedness of the taxing district for purposes of any statutory limitation.
No referendum approval or appropriation shall be required for such an agreement or such credits and any such SB0089 Enrolled - 4 - LRB096 03891 HLH 13926 b obligation shall not constitute indebtedness of the taxing district for purposes of any statutory limitation.
A county treasurer who is a party to such an agreement may agree to hold amounts paid in escrow as provided SB0089 Engrossed - 4 - LRB096 03891 HLH 13926 b in the agreement for possible use for paying taxes until conditions of the agreement are met and then to apply these amounts as provided in the agreement.
A county treasurer who is a party to such an agreement may agree to hold amounts paid in escrow as provided in the agreement for possible use for paying taxes until conditions of the agreement are met and then to apply these amounts as provided in the agreement.
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Public Act . . . . . . . . . 96-0609

  2. Effective Date August 24, 2009

  3. Governor Approved

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. Passed Both Houses

  6. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Senate Concurs 057-000-000

  7. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Senate Concurs 057-000-000

  8. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Motion To Concur Recommended Do Adopt Revenue; 006-000-000

  9. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion To Concur Recommended Do Adopt Revenue; 006-000-000

  10. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Motion to Concur Assignments Referred to Revenue

  11. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Assignments Referred to Revenue

  12. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Motion to Concur Referred to Assignments

  13. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Motion to Concur Filed with Secretary Sen. Gary G. Dahl

  14. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Referred to Assignments

  15. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Filed with Secretary Sen. Gary G. Dahl

  16. Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence House Amendment(s) 1, 2 - May 22, 2009

  17. Secretary's Desk - Concurrence House Amendment(s) 1, 2

  18. Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 115-000-002

  19. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate

  20. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Adopted by Voice Vote

  21. Recalled to Second Reading - Short Debate

  22. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Recommends Be Adopted Rules Committee; 004-000-000

  23. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Referred to Rules Committee

  24. House Floor Amendment No. 2 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Careen M. Gordon

  25. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate

  26. Second Reading - Short Debate

  27. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate

  28. Do Pass as Amended / Short Debate Revenue & Finance Committee; 012-000-000

  29. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted in Revenue & Finance Committee; by Voice Vote

  30. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Revenue & Finance Committee

  31. Added Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Tom Cross

  32. Assigned to Revenue & Finance Committee

  33. Referred to Rules Committee

  34. First Reading

  35. Chief House Sponsor Rep. Careen M. Gordon

  36. Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading

  37. Arrived in House

  38. Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 5-4(a)

  39. Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 5-4(a)

  40. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Tabled Pursuant to Rule 5-4(a)

  41. Third Reading - Passed; 057-000-000

  42. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading

  43. Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Adopted; Dahl

  44. Recalled to Second Reading

  45. Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Recommend Do Adopt Revenue; 007-000-000

  46. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 31, 2009

  47. Second Reading

  48. Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Assignments Refers to Revenue

  49. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Rule 3-9(a) / Re-referred to Assignments

  50. Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Referred to Assignments

  51. Senate Floor Amendment No. 4 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Gary G. Dahl

  52. Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Referred to Assignments

  53. Senate Floor Amendment No. 3 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Gary G. Dahl

  54. Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading February 19, 2009

  55. Do Pass Revenue; 007-002-000

  56. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Held in Revenue

  57. Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Referred to Assignments

  58. Senate Committee Amendment No. 2 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Gary G. Dahl

  59. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Assignments Refers to Revenue

  60. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Assignments

  61. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Gary G. Dahl

  62. Assigned to Revenue

  63. Referred to Assignments

  64. First Reading

  65. Filed with Secretary by Sen. Gary G. Dahl

Sponsors

  • Gary G. Dahl · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Gary G. Dahl

Not signed on (182)

182 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 182 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Concurrence, Amendment 2

Passed 57 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 9000
Unaffiliated 47002
Republican 1000
Total 57002
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (59)
Member Party Vote
Kotowski — Yea
Lauzen — Not Voting
Link — Yea
Luechtefeld — Yea
McCarter — Yea
Meeks — Not Voting
Demuzio — Yea
Millner — Yea
Jacobs — Yea
Noland — Yea
Radogno — Yea
Schoenberg — Yea
Munoz — Yea
Jones, J. — Yea
Silverstein — Yea
Brady — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Steans — Yea
Trotter — Yea
Viverito — Yea
Wilhelmi — Yea
Cullerton — Yea
Clayborne — Yea
Cronin — Yea
Crotty — Yea
Dahl — Yea
DeLeo — Yea
Dillard — Yea
Duffy — Yea
Forby — Yea
Frerichs — Yea
Garrett — Yea
Haine — Yea
Hendon — Yea
Hultgren — Yea
Hutchinson — Yea
Pankau — Yea
Raoul — Yea
Righter — Yea
Risinger — Yea
Rutherford — Yea
Sandoval — Yea
Maloney — Yea
Althoff — Yea
Martinez — Yea
Bivins — Yea
Bomke — Yea
Bond — Yea
Burzynski — Yea
David Koehler Democrat Yea
Don Harmon Democrat Yea
Emil Jones, III Democrat Yea
Eva-Dina Delgado Democrat Yea
Kimberly A. Lightford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Laura M. Murphy Democrat Yea
Linda Holmes Democrat Yea
Mattie Hunter Democrat Yea
Dave Syverson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Concurrence

Passed 57 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 9000
Unaffiliated 47002
Republican 1000
Total 57002
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (59)
Member Party Vote
Hendon — Yea
Hutchinson — Yea
Noland — Yea
McCarter — Yea
Millner — Yea
Radogno — Yea
Schoenberg — Yea
Silverstein — Yea
Steans — Yea
Demuzio — Yea
Jacobs — Yea
Trotter — Yea
Viverito — Yea
Munoz — Yea
Jones, J. — Yea
Brady — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Clayborne — Yea
Dillard — Yea
Duffy — Yea
Forby — Yea
Haine — Yea
Cullerton — Yea
Link — Yea
Luechtefeld — Yea
Maloney — Yea
Meeks — Not Voting
Wilhelmi — Yea
Cronin — Yea
Crotty — Yea
Dahl — Yea
DeLeo — Yea
Hultgren — Yea
Kotowski — Yea
Pankau — Yea
Raoul — Yea
Righter — Yea
Risinger — Yea
Rutherford — Yea
Sandoval — Yea
Lauzen — Not Voting
Althoff — Yea
Martinez — Yea
Bivins — Yea
Bomke — Yea
Bond — Yea
Burzynski — Yea
Frerichs — Yea
Garrett — Yea
David Koehler Democrat Yea
Don Harmon Democrat Yea
Emil Jones, III Democrat Yea
Eva-Dina Delgado Democrat Yea
Kimberly A. Lightford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Laura M. Murphy Democrat Yea
Linda Holmes Democrat Yea
Mattie Hunter Democrat Yea
Dave Syverson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Third Reading

Passed 115 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 100003
Democrat 11000
Republican 4000
Total 115003
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (118)
Member Party Vote
Myers — Yea
Jakobsson — Yea
Jefferson — Yea
Davis, Monique — Yea
Reitz — Yea
Kosel — Yea
Lang — Yea
Leitch — Yea
Mathias — Yea
McAuliffe — Yea
McCarthy — Yea
Lyons — Yea
Mell — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Moffitt — Yea
Mulligan — Yea
Nekritz — Yea
Soto — Yea
Thapedi — Yea
Tryon — Yea
Turner — Yea
Verschoore — Yea
Wait — Yea
Bradley — Yea
McGuire — Yea
Brady — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Burke — Yea
Mitchell, Bill — Yea
Mitchell, Jerry — Yea
Gordon, Careen — Yea
Gordon, Jehan — Yea
Hannig — Yea
Cavaletto — Yea
Cole — Yea
Dugan — Yea
Dunkin — Yea
Durkin — Yea
Eddy — Yea
Farnham — Yea
Flider — Yea
Flowers — Yea
Fortner — Yea
Franks — Yea
Fritchey — Yea
Froehlich — Yea
Golar — Yea
Graham — Yea
Hamos — Yea
Harris — Yea
Madigan — Not Voting
Watson — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Howard — Yea
Phelps — Yea
Pihos — Yea
Washington — Not Voting
Winters — Yea
Yarbrough — Yea
Zalewski — Yea
Coladipietro — Not Voting
Colvin — Yea
Connelly — Yea
Coulson — Yea
Cross — Yea
Cultra — Yea
Currie — Yea
D'Amico — Yea
Hatcher — Yea
Holbrook — Yea
Jackson — Yea
Osmond — Yea
Osterman — Yea
Poe — Yea
Pritchard — Yea
Ramey — Yea
Reboletti — Yea
Reis — Yea
Riley — Yea
Ryg — Yea
Sacia — Yea
Saviano — Yea
Schmitz — Yea
Senger — Yea
Sommer — Yea
Acevedo — Yea
Arroyo — Yea
Bassi — Yea
Beaubien — Yea
Beiser — Yea
Bellock — Yea
Berrios — Yea
Biggins — Yea
Mautino — Yea
Black — Yea
Boland — Yea
May — Yea
Bost — Yea
Brauer — Yea
Brosnahan — Yea
Burns — Yea
McAsey — Yea
Chapa LaVia — Yea
Anthony DeLuca Democrat Yea
Fred Crespo Democrat Yea
Jay Hoffman Democrat Yea
La Shawn K. Ford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Mark L. Walker Democrat Yea
Nicholas K. Smith Democrat Yea
Patrick J. Joyce Democrat Yea
Robert "Bob" Rita Democrat Yea
Sara Feigenholtz Democrat Yea
William "Will" Davis Democrat Yea
Brad Stephens Republican Yea
Chapin Rose Republican Yea
Chris Miller Republican Yea
Jil Tracy Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Third Reading

Passed 57 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 47002
Democrat 9000
Republican 1000
Total 57002
% of votes cast 97%0%0%3%
How each member voted (59)
Member Party Vote
Hendon — Yea
McCarter — Yea
Meeks — Yea
Schoenberg — Yea
Demuzio — Yea
Jacobs — Yea
Hutchinson — Yea
Kotowski — Yea
Lauzen — Yea
Link — Yea
Luechtefeld — Yea
Munoz — Yea
Jones, J. — Yea
Brady — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Millner — Yea
Noland — Yea
Raoul — Yea
Cullerton — Yea
Steans — Yea
Trotter — Yea
Viverito — Yea
Wilhelmi — Yea
Clayborne — Yea
Cronin — Yea
Crotty — Yea
Dahl — Yea
DeLeo — Yea
Dillard — Yea
Duffy — Yea
Forby — Yea
Frerichs — Yea
Garrett — Yea
Haine — Yea
Hultgren — Yea
Pankau — Yea
Radogno — Not Voting
Righter — Yea
Risinger — Yea
Rutherford — Not Voting
Sandoval — Yea
Silverstein — Yea
Maloney — Yea
Althoff — Yea
Martinez — Yea
Bivins — Yea
Bomke — Yea
Bond — Yea
Burzynski — Yea
David Koehler Democrat Yea
Don Harmon Democrat Yea
Emil Jones, III Democrat Yea
Eva-Dina Delgado Democrat Yea
Kimberly A. Lightford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Laura M. Murphy Democrat Yea
Linda Holmes Democrat Yea
Mattie Hunter Democrat Yea
Dave Syverson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

taxation environment
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 89 do?
Amends the Property Tax Code. Provides that a Section authorizing property tax assessment settlement agreements also applies to petrochemical processing facilities located within a county of less than 1,000,000 inhabitants. Effective immediately.
Who sponsors SB 89?
SB 89 is sponsored by Gary G. Dahl.
What is the current status of SB 89?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 30, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 89?
Track SB 89 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 89

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 89

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →