Illinois 96th Regular Session Status: Enacted

HB 372 — DESIGN-BUILD-NO REPEAL

Last action — Public Act . . . . . . . . . 96-0021

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 29, 2009. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    0 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Amends the Design-Build Procurement Act. Eliminates the Act's July 1, 2009 repeal provision. Effective immediately.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

112 added · 8 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill HB 372 includes new procedures for selecting design-build entities, making it more structured and transparent. The State construction agency must now evaluate candidates in two phases: first, assessing qualifications and then reviewing technical and cost proposals. Additionally, the agency is required to disclose specific evaluation criteria and scoring records, which helps ensure accountability in the selection process. These changes are significant because they promote fairness and clarity in how projects are awarded, potentially leading to better outcomes for construction projects.

→
Previous
Latest
HB0372 Engrossed LRB096 04520 JAM 14574 b AN ACT concerning finance.
HB0372 Enrolled LRB096 04520 JAM 14574 b AN ACT concerning finance.
The Design-Build Procurement Act is amended by changing Section 90 as follows:
The Design-Build Procurement Act is amended by changing Sections 30 and 90 as follows:
(30 ILCS 537/90) (Section scheduled to be repealed on July 1, 2009) Sec.
(30 ILCS 537/30) (Section scheduled to be repealed on July 1, 2009) Sec.
30.
Procedures for Selection.
(a) The State construction agency must use a two-phase procedure for the selection of the successful design-build entity.
Phase I of the procedure will evaluate and shortlist the design-build entities based on qualifications, and Phase II will evaluate the technical and cost proposals.
(b) The State construction agency shall include in the request for proposal the evaluating factors to be used in Phase I.
These factors are in addition to any prequalification requirements of design-build entities that the agency has set forth.
Each request for proposal shall establish the relative importance assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, including any weighting of criteria to be employed by the State construction agency.
The State construction agency must maintain a record of the evaluation scoring to be disclosed in event of a protest regarding the solicitation.
HB0372 Enrolled - 2 - LRB096 04520 JAM 14574 b The State construction agency shall include the following criteria in every Phase I evaluation of design-build entities:
(1) experience of personnel;
(2) successful experience with similar project types;
(3) financial capability;
(4) timeliness of past performance;
(5) experience with similarly sized projects;
(6) successful reference checks of the firm;
(7) commitment to assign personnel for the duration of the project and qualifications of the entity's consultants;
and (8) ability or past performance in meeting or exhausting good faith efforts to meet the utilization goals for business enterprises established in the Business Enterprise for Minorities, Females, and Persons with Disabilities Act and with Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act.
The State construction agency may include any additional relevant criteria in Phase I that it deems necessary for a proper qualification review.
The State construction agency may not consider any design-build entity for evaluation or award if the entity has any pecuniary interest in the project or has other relationships or circumstances, including but not limited to, long-term leasehold, mutual performance, or development contracts with the State construction agency, that may give the design-build entity a financial or tangible advantage over other design-build entities in the preparation, evaluation, or performance of the design-build contract or that create the appearance of impropriety.
No proposal shall be considered that does not include an entity's plan to comply with the HB0372 Enrolled - 3 - LRB096 04520 JAM 14574 b requirements established in the Business Enterprise for Minorities, Females, and Persons with Disabilities Act, for both the design and construction areas of performance, and with Section 2-105 of the Illinois Human Rights Act.
Upon completion of the qualifications evaluation, the State construction agency shall create a shortlist of the most highly qualified design-build entities.
The State construction agency, in its discretion, is not required to shortlist the maximum number of entities as identified for Phase II evaluation, provided however, no less than 2 design-build entities nor more than 6 are selected to submit Phase II proposals.
The State construction agency shall notify the entities selected for the shortlist in writing.
This notification shall commence the period for the preparation of the Phase II technical and cost evaluations.
The State construction agency must allow sufficient time for the shortlist entities to prepare their Phase II submittals considering the scope and detail requested by the State agency.
(c) The State construction agency shall include in the request for proposal the evaluating factors to be used in the technical and cost submission components of Phase II.
Each request for proposal shall establish, for both the technical and cost submission components of Phase II, the relative importance assigned to each evaluation factor and subfactor, including any weighting of criteria to be employed by the State HB0372 Enrolled - 4 - LRB096 04520 JAM 14574 b construction agency.
The State construction agency must maintain a record of the evaluation scoring to be disclosed in event of a protest regarding the solicitation.
The State construction agency shall include the following criteria in every Phase II technical evaluation of design-build entities:
(1) compliance with objectives of the project;
(2) compliance of proposed services to the request for proposal requirements;
(3) quality of products or materials proposed;
(4) quality of design parameters;
(5) design concepts;
(6) innovation in meeting the scope and performance criteria;
and (7) constructability of the proposed project.
The State construction agency may include any additional relevant technical evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper selection.
Show all 50 changed rows (10 more)
Previous
Latest
The State construction agency shall include the following criteria in every Phase II cost evaluation:
the total project cost, the construction costs, and the time of completion.
The State construction agency may include any additional relevant technical evaluation factors it deems necessary for proper selection.
The total project cost criteria weighing factor shall be 25%.
The State construction agency shall directly employ or retain a licensed design professional to evaluate the technical and cost submissions to determine if the technical submissions are in accordance with generally accepted industry standards.
Upon completion of the technical submissions and cost HB0372 Enrolled - 5 - LRB096 04520 JAM 14574 b submissions evaluation, the State construction agency may award the design-build contract to the highest overall ranked entity.
(Source:
P.A.
94-716, eff.
12-13-05.) (30 ILCS 537/90) (Section scheduled to be repealed on July 1, 2009) Sec.
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Public Act . . . . . . . . . 96-0021

  2. Effective Date June 30, 2009

  3. Governor Approved

  4. Sent to the Governor

  5. Passed Both Houses

  6. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 House Concurs 117-000-000

  7. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Recommends Be Adopted Rules Committee; 004-000-000

  8. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Referred to Rules Committee

  9. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion Filed Concur Rep. Frank J. Mautino

  10. Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence Senate Amendment(s) 1

  11. Arrived in House

  12. Third Reading - Passed; 058-000-000

  13. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading May 17, 2009

  14. Second Reading

  15. Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading May 12, 2009

  16. Do Pass as Amended State Government and Veterans Affairs; 009-000-000

  17. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted

  18. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Assignments Refers to State Government and Veterans Affairs

  19. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Assignments

  20. Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. Jeffrey M. Schoenberg

  21. Assigned to State Government and Veterans Affairs

  22. Referred to Assignments

  23. First Reading

  24. Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. Jeffrey M. Schoenberg

  25. Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading

  26. Arrive in Senate

  27. Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 110-000-000

  28. Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Jehan A. Gordon

  29. Chief Sponsor Changed to Rep. Frank J. Mautino

  30. Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate

  31. Second Reading - Short Debate

  32. Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate

  33. Do Pass as Amended / Short Debate State Government Administration Committee; 016-001-000

  34. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted in State Government Administration Committee; by Voice Vote

  35. House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by State Government Administration Committee

  36. Assigned to State Government Administration Committee

  37. Referred to Rules Committee

  38. First Reading

  39. Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Gary Hannig

Sponsors

  • Frank J. Mautino · Cosponsor

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

0 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on

Sponsors (0)

None.

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Frank J. Mautino

Not signed on (182)

182 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 182 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Concurrence

Passed 117 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 103000
Democrat 10001
Republican 4000
Total 117001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (118)
Member Party Vote
Holbrook — Yea
Jackson — Yea
Lang — Yea
Leitch — Yea
Davis, Monique — Yea
Mathias — Yea
Mautino — Yea
Reitz — Yea
May — Yea
McAuliffe — Yea
McCarthy — Yea
Mell — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Lyons — Yea
Senger — Yea
Sommer — Yea
Thapedi — Yea
Bradley — Yea
McGuire — Yea
Brady — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Burke — Yea
Mitchell, Bill — Yea
Mitchell, Jerry — Yea
Gordon, Careen — Yea
Cavaletto — Yea
Dugan — Yea
Dunkin — Yea
Durkin — Yea
Eddy — Yea
Farnham — Yea
Flider — Yea
Flowers — Yea
Fortner — Yea
Franks — Yea
Fritchey — Yea
Froehlich — Yea
Golar — Yea
Jefferson — Yea
Kosel — Yea
Gordon, Jehan — Yea
Madigan — Yea
Moffitt — Yea
Hannig — Yea
Harris — Yea
Myers — Yea
Nekritz — Yea
Osmond — Yea
Watson — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Osterman — Yea
Pihos — Yea
Howard — Yea
Tryon — Yea
Turner — Yea
Verschoore — Yea
Wait — Yea
Winters — Yea
Yarbrough — Yea
Zalewski — Yea
Coladipietro — Yea
Cole — Yea
Cross — Yea
Cultra — Yea
Currie — Yea
D'Amico — Yea
Graham — Yea
Hamos — Yea
Hatcher — Yea
Jakobsson — Yea
Phelps — Yea
Poe — Yea
Pritchard — Yea
Ramey — Yea
Reboletti — Yea
Reis — Yea
Riley — Yea
Ryg — Yea
Sacia — Yea
Saviano — Yea
Schmitz — Yea
Soto — Yea
Washington — Yea
Acevedo — Yea
Arroyo — Yea
Bassi — Yea
Beaubien — Yea
Beiser — Yea
Bellock — Yea
Berrios — Yea
Biggins — Yea
Black — Yea
Boland — Yea
Bost — Yea
Brauer — Yea
Brosnahan — Yea
Burns — Yea
Colvin — Yea
Connelly — Yea
McAsey — Yea
Coulson — Yea
Mulligan — Yea
Chapa LaVia — Yea
Anthony DeLuca Democrat Yea
Fred Crespo Democrat Yea
Jay Hoffman Democrat Yea
La Shawn K. Ford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Not Voting
Mark L. Walker Democrat Yea
Nicholas K. Smith Democrat Yea
Patrick J. Joyce Democrat Yea
Robert "Bob" Rita Democrat Yea
Sara Feigenholtz Democrat Yea
William "Will" Davis Democrat Yea
Brad Stephens Republican Yea
Chapin Rose Republican Yea
Chris Miller Republican Yea
Jil Tracy Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Third Reading

Passed 58 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 48001
Democrat 9000
Republican 1000
Total 58001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (59)
Member Party Vote
Haine — Yea
McCarter — Yea
Schoenberg — Yea
Demuzio — Yea
Jacobs — Yea
Munoz — Yea
Jones, J. — Yea
Brady — Yea
Dillard — Yea
Duffy — Yea
Forby — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Kotowski — Yea
Lauzen — Yea
Link — Yea
Luechtefeld — Not Voting
Noland — Yea
Cullerton — Yea
Radogno — Yea
Trotter — Yea
Viverito — Yea
Wilhelmi — Yea
Clayborne — Yea
Cronin — Yea
Crotty — Yea
Dahl — Yea
DeLeo — Yea
Frerichs — Yea
Garrett — Yea
Hendon — Yea
Hultgren — Yea
Hutchinson — Yea
Pankau — Yea
Raoul — Yea
Righter — Yea
Risinger — Yea
Rutherford — Yea
Sandoval — Yea
Silverstein — Yea
Steans — Yea
Maloney — Yea
Althoff — Yea
Martinez — Yea
Bivins — Yea
Bomke — Yea
Bond — Yea
Burzynski — Yea
Meeks — Yea
Millner — Yea
David Koehler Democrat Yea
Don Harmon Democrat Yea
Emil Jones, III Democrat Yea
Eva-Dina Delgado Democrat Yea
Kimberly A. Lightford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Yea
Laura M. Murphy Democrat Yea
Linda Holmes Democrat Yea
Mattie Hunter Democrat Yea
Dave Syverson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Third Reading

Passed 110 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 99003
Democrat 8002
Republican 3001
Total 110006
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (116)
Member Party Vote
Graham — Yea
Myers — Yea
Jakobsson — Yea
Jefferson — Yea
Lang — Yea
Mathias — Yea
McAuliffe — Yea
Senger — Yea
Davis, Monique — Yea
Reitz — Yea
Lyons — Yea
D'Amico — Yea
Dugan — Yea
Dunkin — Yea
Durkin — Yea
Eddy — Yea
Farnham — Yea
Flider — Yea
Kosel — Yea
McCarthy — Yea
Mell — Yea
Moffitt — Yea
Bradley, John — Yea
McGuire — Yea
Mulligan — Yea
Brady — Yea
Nekritz — Yea
Phelps — Yea
Pihos — Yea
Sullivan — Yea
Sommer — Yea
Burke — Yea
Mitchell, Bill — Yea
Soto — Yea
Thapedi — Yea
Mitchell, Jerry — Yea
Gordon, Jehan — Yea
Tryon — Yea
Turner — Yea
Verschoore — Yea
Wait — Yea
Harris — Yea
Winters — Yea
Yarbrough — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Watson — Yea
Howard — Yea
Gordon, Careen — Not Voting
Cavaletto — Yea
Coladipietro — Yea
Cole — Yea
Cross — Yea
Cultra — Yea
Currie — Yea
Flowers — Yea
Fortner — Yea
Franks — Yea
Fritchey — Yea
Froehlich — Yea
Golar — Yea
Hamos — Yea
Hatcher — Yea
Holbrook — Yea
Jackson — Yea
Madigan — Not Voting
Osmond — Yea
Osterman — Yea
Poe — Yea
Pritchard — Yea
Ramey — Yea
Reboletti — Yea
Reis — Yea
Riley — Yea
Ryg — Yea
Sacia — Yea
Saviano — Not Voting
Schmitz — Yea
Washington — Yea
Zalewski — Yea
Leitch — Yea
Acevedo — Yea
Arroyo — Yea
Bassi — Yea
Beaubien — Yea
Beiser — Yea
Bellock — Yea
Berrios — Yea
Biggins — Yea
Mautino — Yea
Black — Yea
Boland — Yea
May — Yea
Bost — Yea
Brauer — Yea
Brosnahan — Yea
Burns — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Colvin — Yea
Connelly — Yea
McAsey — Yea
Coulson — Yea
Chapa LaVia — Yea
Fred Crespo Democrat Yea
Jay Hoffman Democrat Yea
La Shawn K. Ford Democrat Yea
Lakesia Collins Democrat Not Voting
Mark L. Walker Democrat Yea
Nicholas K. Smith Democrat Yea
Patrick J. Joyce Democrat Yea
Robert "Bob" Rita Democrat Yea
Sara Feigenholtz Democrat Not Voting
William "Will" Davis Democrat Yea
Brad Stephens Republican Not Voting
Chapin Rose Republican Yea
Chris Miller Republican Yea
Jil Tracy Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 372 do?
Amends the Design-Build Procurement Act. Eliminates the Act's July 1, 2009 repeal provision. Effective immediately.
Who sponsors HB 372?
HB 372 is sponsored by Frank J. Mautino.
What is the current status of HB 372?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 29, 2009. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 372?
Track HB 372 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 372

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 372

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →