Wisconsin 2021-2022 Regular Session Status: To Executive 12 R cosponsors

AB 46 — Relating to: financial exploitation of vulnerable adults.

Last action — Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

239 added · 17 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to Assembly Bill 46 simplifies the process for how financial service providers can respond when they suspect financial exploitation of vulnerable adults. Specifically, it changes the time frame for refusing or delaying a financial transaction from potentially indefinite to a maximum of 15 business days, extendable to 25 days with proper requests. This change is important because it provides clearer guidelines for financial institutions while balancing the need to protect vulnerable adults without unduly delaying their access to funds.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2022 LEGISLATURE LRBa0273/1 ARG:cjs ASSEMBLY AMENDMENT 2, TO ASSEMBLY BILL 46 March 9, 2021 - Offered by RepresentativesACCOand M CGUIRE.
- 2022 LEGISLATURE LRB-0550/1 ARG:emw ASSEMBLY BILL 46 February 10, 2021 - Introduced by Representatives MACCO, WITTKE, ARMSTRONG , C ALLAHAN, D ITTRICH, EDMING , H ORLACHER, K ATSMA , KERKMAN , K NODL , K UGLITSCH, MAGNAFICI, M ILRO, M URPHY, PETRYK , RAMTHUN , SKOWRONSKI , SNYDER , TEFFEN , UMMERFIELD , RANEL , IMMERMAN and TITTL, cosponsored by Senators T ESTIN, CARPENTER , BALLWEG , FELZKOWSKI, F EYEN, JACQUE , M ARKLEIN and L .TAYLOR.
At the locations indicated, amend the bill as follows:
Referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety.
A N A CT to create 224.45 of the statutes;
relating to:
financial exploitation of vulnerable adults.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau This bill allows financial service providers to refuse or delay financial transactions when financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult is suspected.
The bill authorizes financial service providers to take certain other actions to prevent or detect financial exploitation of vulnerable adults.
Under current law, upon receiving a report of alleged abuse, financial exploitation, neglect, or self-neglect of any person age 60 or older who has experienced, is experiencing, or is at risk of experiencing abuse, neglect, self-neglect, or financial exploitation (an elder adult at risk), the elder-adult-at-risk agency in a county must respond by investigating or must refer the report to another agency for investigation.
Similarly, if the adult-at-risk agency in a county has reason to believe that an adult who has a physical or mental condition that substantially impairs his or her ability to care for his or her needs and who has experienced, is experiencing, or is at risk of experiencing abuse, neglect, self-neglect, or financial exploitation (an adult at risk) is the subject of abuse, financial exploitation, neglect, or self-neglect, the adult-at-risk agency may respond by investigating to determine whether the adult at risk is in need of protective services.
“Financial exploitation” includes obtaining an individual's money or property by deceiving or enticing the individual or by coercing the individual to give, sell at less than fair value, or convey money or property against his or her will without his or her informed consent, and also includes certain crimes such as theft and forgery.
- 2022 Legislature - 2 - LRB-0550/1 ARG:emw ASSEMBLY BILL 46 Under this bill, if a financial service provider reasonably suspects that financial exploitation of an adult at risk or an individual who is 60 years of age or older (together, vulnerable adult) has occurred or been attempted, the financial service provider may, but is not required to, refuse or delay a financial transaction on an account of the vulnerable adult or on which the vulnerable adult is a beneficiary or on an account of a person suspected of perpetrating financial exploitation.
The definition of “financial service provider” under the bill includes financial institutions, mortgage bankers and brokers, other types of lenders, and check cashing services.
In addition, a financial service provider may, but is not required to, refuse or delay a financial transaction if an elder-adult-at-risk agency, adult-at-risk agency, or law enforcement agency provides information to the financial service provider that financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult may have occurred or been attempted.
The bill requires certain notice if a financial service provider refuses or delays a financial transaction under these circumstances and establishes certain time limits applicable to the refusal or delay of the financial transaction.
In addition, the bill allows a financial service provider to refuse to accept a power of attorney of a vulnerable adult if the financial service provider reasonably suspects that the vulnerable adult may be the victim of financial exploitation.
The bill also provides a process for a financial service provider to create a list of persons that a vulnerable adult authorizes to be contacted if the financial service provider reasonably suspects that the vulnerable adult is a victim of financial exploitation and authorizes the financial service provider to convey its suspicions of financial exploitation to certain persons, including persons on this list.
Under the bill, a financial service provider is immune from criminal, civil, and administrative liability for all of the following:
1) refusing or not refusing, or delaying or not delaying, a financial transaction;
2) refusing to accept or accepting a power of attorney;
3) contacting a person or not contacting a person to convey a suspicion of financial exploitation;
and 4) any action based on a reasonable determination related to the preceding items 1 to 3.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
SECTION 1.
224.45 of the statutes is created to read:
224.45 Financial exploitation of vulnerable adults.
(1) D EFINITIONS.
In this section:
(a) “Account” means funds or assets held by a financial service provider, including a deposit account, savings account, share account, certificate of deposit, LRB-0550/1 - 2022 Legislature - 3 - ARG:emw SECTION 1 ASSEMBLY BILL 46 trust account, guardianship or conservatorship account, or retirement account, and also including an account associated with a loan or other extension of credit.
(b) “Adult at risk” has the meaning given in s.
55.01 (1e).
(c) “Adult-at-risk agency” has the meaning given in s.
55.01 (1f).
(d) “Elder-adult-at-risk agency” has the meaning given in s.
46.90 (1) (bt).
(e) “Financial exploitation” has the meaning given in s.
46.90 (1) (ed).
(f) “Financial institution” has the meaning given in s.
214.01 (1) (jn).
(g) “Financial service provider” means any of the following engaged in or transacting business in this state:
Page 5, line 23:
A financial institution.
Show all 145 changed rows (105 more)
Previous
Latest
delete “pars.
(f) and (g)" and substitute “par.
(g)".
Page 6, line 4:
A mortgage banker, mortgage broker, or mortgage loan originator, as defined in s.
delete lines 4 to 6 and substitute:
224.71 (3), (4), or (6).
“1.
Fifteen business days after the date on which the financial service provider first refused or delayed the financial transaction, unless the division or an agency to which the incident was reported under par.
(c) 2.
requests that the financial service provider extends the refusal or delay, in which case the refusal or delay shall expire no more than 25 business days after the date on which the financial service provider first refused or delayed the financial transaction unless it is otherwise terminated or extended by the division or court order.”.
Page 6, line 13:
A seller of checks, as defined in s.
delete lines 13 to 16.
217.02 (9).
4.
A community currency exchange, as defined in s.
218.05 (1) (b).
5.
A payday loan licensee under s.
138.14.
6.
A title loan licensee under s.
138.16.
7.
A lender licensed under s.
138.09.
8.
An insurance premium finance company, as defined in s.
138.12 (1) (b).
9.
A sales finance company, as defined in s.
218.0101 (34).
(h) “Financial transaction" means any of the following as applicable to the business of, or services provided by, a financial service provider:
1.
A transfer or disbursement of, or request to transfer or disburse, funds or assets in an account.
2.
A request to initiate a wire transfer, initiate an automated clearinghouse transfer, or issue a money order, cashier's check, or teller's check.
- 2022 Legislature - 4 - LRB-0550/1 ARG:emw ASSEMBLY BILL 46 S ECTION 1 3.
A request to negotiate a check or other negotiable instrument.
4.
A request to change the ownership of an account.
5.
A request for a loan or other extension of credit or to draw on a line of credit.
6.
A request to modify a loan or other extension of credit or add an authorized signer on a line of credit.
7.
A request to issue a debit card or initiate a debit card transaction.
8.
A request to transfer the title to any real property, manufactured home, or motor vehicle, or to encumber any real property, manufactured home, or motor vehicle.
(i) “Law enforcement agency” has the meaning given in s.
165.77 (1) (b).
(j) “Vulnerable adult” means an adult at risk or an individual who is at least 60 years of age.
(2) FINANCIAL SERVICE PROVIDERS MAY REFUSE OR DELAY TRANSACTIONS.
(a) Notwithstanding any provision of ch.
403, 404, or 410, if a financial service provider has reasonable cause to suspect that financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult may have occurred, may have been attempted, or is being attempted, the financial service provider may, but is not required to, refuse or delay any of the following:
1.
A financial transaction on an account of the vulnerable adult.
2.
A financial transaction on an account on which the vulnerable adult is a beneficiary, including a trust, guardianship, or conservatorship account.
3.
A financial transaction on an account of a person suspected of perpetrating financial exploitation.
(b) 1.
Notwithstanding any provision of ch.
403, 404, or 410, a financial service provider may also refuse or delay a financial transaction under this subsection if an elder-adult-at-risk agency, adult-at-risk agency, or law enforcement agency LRB-0550/1 - 2022 Legislature - 5 - ARG:emw SECTION 1 ASSEMBLY BILL 46 provides information to the financial service provider demonstrating that it is reasonable to suspect that financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult may have occurred, may have been attempted, or is being attempted.
2.
Except as ordered by a court, a financial service provider is not required to refuse or delay a financial transaction when provided with information by an elder-adult-at-risk agency, adult-at-risk agency, or law enforcement agency alleging that financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult may have occurred, may have been attempted, or is being attempted, but may use its discretion to determine whether to refuse or delay a financial transaction based on the information available to the financial service provider.
(c) A financial service provider that refuses or delays a financial transaction based on reasonable cause to suspect that financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult may have occurred, may have been attempted, or is being attempted shall do all of the following:
1.
Except with regard to an account administered by a financial institution in a fiduciary capacity, make a reasonable effort to notify, orally or in writing, one or more parties authorized to transact business on the account.
2.
If the incident involves financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult, report the incident to the applicable elder-adult-at-risk agency or adult-at-risk agency.
(d) No notice under this subsection is required to be provided to any party authorized to conduct business on the account if the party is the suspected perpetrator of financial exploitation.
(e) Except as provided in pars.
(f) and (g), any refusal by a financial service provider to conduct a financial transaction or delay a financial transaction as authorized by this subsection based on the financial service provider's reasonable - 2022 Legislature - 6 - LRB-0550/1 ARG:emw ASSEMBLY BILL 46 S ECTION 1 cause to suspect that financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult may have occurred, may have been attempted, or is being attempted expires upon the earliest of any of the following:
1.
Five business days after the date on which the financial service provider first refused or delayed the financial transaction, unless earlier terminated by a court order.
2.
The time when the financial service provider reasonably believes that the financial transaction will not result in financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult.
3.
The time when the customer requesting the transaction has been advised of a potential risk in the transaction and the customer has requested the transaction to continue as long as the customer is not the suspected perpetrator of financial exploitation.
(f) A financial service provider may extend the time permitted in this subsection to refuse or delay a financial transaction based on a reasonable suspicion that additional time is needed to investigate the financial transaction or to prevent financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult.
(g) A court may enter an order extending the time that a financial service provider shall refuse or delay a financial transaction based on reasonable cause to suspect that financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult may have occurred, may have been attempted, or is being attempted.
(h) Notwithstanding any provision of ch.
403, 404, or 410, a financial service provider, or an employee of a financial service provider, acting in good faith is immune from all criminal, civil, and administrative liability for any of the following:
1.
Refusing or not refusing, or delaying or not delaying, a financial transaction under this subsection.
LRB-0550/1 - 2022 Legislature - 7 - ARG:emw SECTION 1 ASSEMBLY BILL 46 2.
Actions taken in furtherance of the determination made under subd.
1.
if the determination was based on a reasonable suspicion.
(3) LIST OF AUTHORIZED CONTACTS.(a) A financial service provider may offer to a vulnerable adult the opportunity to submit and periodically update a list of persons that the vulnerable adult authorizes the financial service provider to contact when the financial service provider has reasonable cause to suspect that the vulnerable adult is a victim or a target of financial exploitation.
(b) A financial service provider, or an officer or employee of the financial service provider, that has reasonable cause to suspect that a vulnerable adult is the victim or target of financial exploitation may convey the suspicion to any of the following if the person is not the suspected perpetrator:
1.
Any person on the list described in par.
(a) if a list has been provided by the vulnerable adult.
2.
Any co-owner, additional authorized signatory, or beneficiary on the account of the vulnerable adult.
3.
Any person known by the financial service provider to be a family member, including a parent, spouse, adult child, or sibling.
(c) When providing information under this subsection, the financial service provider may limit the information and disclose only that the financial service provider has reasonable cause to suspect that the vulnerable adult may be a victim or target of financial exploitation without disclosing any other details or confidential personal information regarding the financial affairs of the vulnerable adult.
(d) The financial service provider may choose not to contact any person on the list provided under par.
(a) if the financial service provider suspects that the person or persons are engaged in financial exploitation.
- 2022 Legislature - 8 - LRB-0550/1 ARG:emw ASSEMBLY BILL 46 SECTION 1 (e) The financial service provider may rely on information provided by the customer in compiling a list of contact persons.
(f) A financial service provider, or an employee of a financial service provider, acting in good faith is immune from all criminal, civil, and administrative liability for contacting a person or electing not to contact a person under this subsection and for actions taken in furtherance of that determination if the determination was made based on reasonable suspicion.
(4) FINANCIAL SERVICE PROVIDERS MAY REFUSE POWER OF ATTORNEY.
(a) Notwithstanding s.
244.20, a financial service provider may refuse to accept an acknowledged power of attorney if the principal is a vulnerable adult and the financial service provider has reasonable cause to suspect that the principal is or may be the victim or target of financial exploitation by the agent or person acting for or with the agent.
(b) A financial service provider, or an employee of a financial service provider, acting in good faith is immune from all criminal, civil, and administrative liability for refusing to accept a power of attorney or for accepting a power of attorney under this subsection and for actions taken in furtherance of that determination if the determination was based on reasonable suspicion.
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Failed to concur in pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Read first time and referred to committee on Financial Institutions and Revenue

  3. Received from Assembly

  4. Ordered immediately messaged

  5. Read a third time and passed

  6. Rules suspended

  7. Ordered to a third reading

  8. Assembly Amendment 2 adopted

  9. Read a second time

  10. Placed on calendar 5-11-2021 by Committee on Rules

  11. Referred to committee on Rules

  12. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 13, Noes 1

  13. Report Assembly Amendment 2 adoption recommended by Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety, Ayes 14, Noes 0

  14. Executive action taken

  15. Representative Stubbs added as a coauthor

  16. Assembly Amendment 2 offered by Representatives Macco and McGuire

  17. Representative Bowen added as a coauthor

  18. Public hearing held

  19. Assembly Amendment 1 offered by Representative Macco

  20. Representatives James and Duchow added as coauthors

  21. Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety

  22. Introduced by Representatives Macco, Wittke, Armstrong, Callahan, Dittrich, Edming, Horlacher, Katsma, Kerkman, Knodl, Kuglitsch, Magnafici, Milroy, Murphy, Petryk, Ramthun, Skowronski, Snyder, Steffen, Summerfield, Tranel, Zimmerman and Tittl; cosponsored by Senators Testin, Carpenter, Ballweg, Felzkowski, Feyen, Jacque, Marklein and L. Taylor

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

23 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 109 not signed on

Sponsors (23)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (109)

109 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 109 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

finance civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 46?
AB 46 is sponsored by Tittl, Paul (Republican), Zimmerman, Shannon (Republican), Tranel, Travis (Republican), Summerfield, Rob (Republican), Steffen, David (Republican), Snyder, Patrick (Republican), Skowronski, Ramthun, Petryk, Murphy, David (Republican), Milroy, Magnafici, Kuglitsch, Knodl, Daniel (Republican), Kerkman, Katsma, Horlacher, Edming, Dittrich, Barbara (Republican), Callahan, Calvin (Republican), Armstrong, David (Republican), Wittke, Robert (Republican), and Macco.
What is the current status of AB 46?
This bill died with 2021-2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 46?
Track AB 46 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 46

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 46

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →