Wisconsin 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 5 D · 3 R cosponsors

SB 39 — Relating to: expungement of records of certain crimes. (FE)

Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

195 added · 23 removed

Plain-language change summary

The bill SB 39 has been revised to include protections against employment discrimination for individuals whose criminal records have been expunged. Specifically, it now states that employers cannot discriminate against someone based on an expunged conviction. This change is significant as it aims to help reintegrate individuals into the workforce after they have served their time, promoting second chances and reducing barriers to employment for those with past convictions.

→
Previous
Latest
- 2020 LEGISLATURE LRBa0108/1 MED&CMH:amn SENATE AMENDMENT 1, TO SENATE BILL 39 April 1, 2019 - Offered by SenatARLING.
- 2020 LEGISLATURE LRB-1690/1 CMH&MED:cdc SENATE BILL 39 February 15, 2019 - Introduced by Senators ARLING, RISSE, L.TAYLOR, BERNIER, C ARPENTER, F EYEN, J OHNSON , LARSON , O LSEN, P ETROWSKI, R INGHAND , SCHACHTNER , SMITH, ESTIN, IFFANY, WANGGAARD and W IRCH, cosponsored by Representatives S TEFFEN, G OYKE, A LLEN, ANDERSON , B ILLING, B OWEN , B ROOKS, BROSTOFF, CABRERA , C ONSIDINE, C ROWLEY, D OYLE, EDMING , FELZKOWSKI , FIELD, GUNDRUM , H AYWOOD, H INT, KERKMAN , KOLSTE, KRUG , K ULP, LOUDENBECK , MURSAU , M YERS, NOVAK, N YGREN, O HNSTAD, PETRYK , PLUMER , OPE , RONSCHINSKE, QUINN, AMTHUN ,RIEMER, OHRKASTE , ARGENT , SCHRAA , INICK, SKOWRONSKI , NYDER , ORTWELL , PIROS, PREITZER, TUBBS , SUBECK , AUCHEN , C.TAYLOR, HIESFELDT, TITT, VININ, VRUWINK , AMARRIPA and ZIMMERMAN .
At the locations indicated, amend the bill as follows:
Referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety.
1.
A N A CT to renumber 111.335 (3) (a);
Page 2, line 3:
to renumber and amend 973.015 (1m) (a) 1.;
after “(ag)" insert “1.".
to amend 111.335 (4) (b), 111.335 (4) (c) 1.
2.
(intro.), 111.335 (4) (e), 111.335 (4) (f) 1., 950.04 (1v) (g) and 973.015 (1m) (b);
Page 2, line 9:
and to create 111.335 (3) (ag), 973.015 (1m) (a) 1.
after that line insert:
a.
“2.
and b., 973.015 (1m) (a) 3.
Notwithstanding par.
c.
(ar) 1., it is employment discrimination because of conviction record for an employer or licensing agency to engage in any act of employment discrimination specified in s.
and d.
111.322 on the basis of a conviction the record of which has been expunged under s.
and 4., 973.015 (1m) (c) and 973.015 (4) of the statutes;
relating to:
expungement of records of certain crimes.
Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Under current law, a court may order a person's criminal record expunged of a crime for which the maximum term of imprisonment is six years or less (Class H felony and below) if the person committed that crime before the age of 25, the person had not been previously convicted of a felony, and the crime was not a violent felony.
Current law specifies that the expungement order must be made only at sentencing and then the record is expunged when the person completes his or her sentence.
This bill removes the condition that the person committed the crime before the age of 25 (the bill retains the requirements that the crime be no greater than a Class H felony, the person had no previous felony convictions, and the crime was not a violent felony) and makes certain traffic crimes ineligible for expungement.
This bill also provides that, if the sentencing court did not order the record expunged, the person may file a petition with the sentencing court after he or she completes his or her sentence.
Upon receipt of the petition, the court must review the petition and - 2020 Legislature - 2 - LRB-1690/1 CMH&MED:cdc SENATE BILL 39 then may order the record expunged or may deny the petition.
If the court denies the petition, the person may not file another petition for two years, and no person may file more than two petitions per crime.
The changes described in this paragraph retroactively apply to persons who were convicted of a crime before this bill takes effect.
This bill also allows the sentencing court to order that a person's record not be eligible for expungement.
This bill provides that, if a record is expunged of a crime, that crime is not considered a conviction for employment purposes and specifies that employment discrimination because of a conviction record includes requesting a person to supply information regarding a crime if the record has been expunged of the crime.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
S ECTION 1.
111.335 (3) (a) of the statutes is renumbered 111.335 (3) (ar).
S ECTION 2.
111.335 (3) (ag) of the statutes is created to read:
111.335 (3) (ag) Employment discrimination because of conviction record includes, but is not limited to, requesting an applicant, employee, member, licensee, or any other individual, on an application form or otherwise, to supply information regarding a crime the record of which has been expunged under s.
This subdivision does not apply to the extent that its application conflicts with federal law.”.
A request to supply information regarding criminal convictions shall not be construed as a request to supply information regarding a crime the record of which has been expunged under s.
973.015.
S ECTION 3.
111.335 (4) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
111.335(4) (b) It is employment discrimination because of conviction record for a licensing agency to refuse to license any individual under sub.
(3) ((ar) 1.
or to bar or terminate an individual from licensing under sub.
(3) (a)(ar) 1.
because the individual was adjudicated delinquent under ch.
938 for an offense other than an exempt offense.
Show all 156 changed rows (116 more)
Previous
Latest
LRB-1690/1 - 2020 Legislature - 3 - CMH&MED:cdc SECTION 4 SENATE BILL 39 SECTION 4.
111.335 (4) (c) 1.
(intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
111.335 (4) (c) 1.
(intro.) If a licensing agency refuses to license an individual under sub.
(3) (a) (ar) 1.
or bars or terminates an individual from licensing under sub.
(3) (a) (ar) 1., the licensing agency shall, subject to subd.
2., do all of the following:
SECTION 5.
111.335 (4) (e) of the statutes is amended to read:
111.335 (4) (e) A state licensing agency that may refuse to license individuals under sub.
(3) (a)r) 1.
or that may bar or terminate an individual from licensure under sub.
(3) (a)ar) 1.
shall publish on the agency's Internet site a document indicating the offenses or kinds of offenses that may result in such a refusal, bar, or termination.
SECTION 6.
111.335 (4) (f) 1.
of the statutes is amended to read:
111.335(4) (f) 1.
A state licensing agency that may refuse to license individuals under sub.
(3) (a) (ar) 1.
or that may bar or terminate individuals from licensing under sub.
(3) (a)) 1.
shall allow an individual who does not possess a license to, without submitting a full application and without paying the fees applicable to applicants, apply to the agency for a determination of whether the individual would be disqualified from obtaining the license due to his or her conviction record.
SECTION 7.
950.04 (1v) (g) of the statutes is amended to read:
950.04 (1v) (g) To have reasonable attempts made to notify the victim of hearings or court proceedings, as provided under ss.
302.113 (9g) (g) 2., 302.114 (6), 938.27 (4m) and (6), 938.273 (2), 971.095 (3) and, 972.14 (3) (b), and 973.015 (1m) (c).
SECTION 8.
973.015 (1m) (a) 1.
of the statutes is renumbered 973.015 (1m) (a) 1.
(intro.) and amended to read:
973.015 (1m) (a) 1.
(intro.) Subject to subd.
2.
and except as provided in subd.
3., when a person is under the age of 25 at the time of the commission of an offense - 2020 Legislature - 4 - LRB-1690/1 CMH&MED:cdc SENATE BILL 39 SECTION 8 for which the person has been found guilty in a court for violation of a law for which the maximum period of imprisonment is 6 years or less, the, a court may order at the time of sentencing after a conviction that the record a criminal case be expunged upon successful completion of the sentence if the court determines the person will benefit and society will not be harmed by this disposition.
by one of the following methods:
(d) This subsection does not apply to information maintained by the department of transportation regarding a conviction that is required to be included in a record kept under s.
343.23 (2) (a).
SECTION 9.
973.015 (1m) (a) 1.
a.
and b.
of the statutes are created to read:
973.015 (1m) (a) 1.
a.
Except as provided in subd.
3., the court may order at the time of sentencing that the record be expunged upon successful completion of the sentence if the court determines that person will benefit and society will not be harmed by this disposition.
b.
If at least one year has passed since the person successfully completed his or her sentence, the person may file a petition in the county of conviction requesting that the record be expunged.
Upon receipt of the petition, the court shall review the petition to determine if the person is ineligible to petition for expungement because subd.
Page 3, line 21:
or 4.
after that line insert:
applies, less than one year has passed since the person successfully completed his or her sentence, there are criminal charges pending against the person, or the person has exceeded the maximum number of petitions allowed under this subd.
“SECTION7s.
1.
973.015 (1b) of the statutes is created to read:
b.If the court determines the person is eligible to petition for expungement, the court shall forward the petition to the district attorney.
973.015 (1b) In this section, “record” means a criminal case file.”.
If the district attorney requests a hearing within 90 days after the court forwards the petition, the court shall schedule a hearing to review the petition.
If the district LRB-1690/1 - 2020 Legislature - 5 - CMH&MED:cdc SECTION 9 SENATE BILL 39 attorney waives the hearing or at least 90 days have passed since the court forwarded the petition, the court may review the petition with or without a hearing.
If a hearing is scheduled, then if practicable, the sentencing judge shall be the judge to review the petition.
The court may order that the record be expunged if the court determines the person will benefit and society will not be harmed by this disposition.
If the court does not order the record be expunged under this subd.
1.
b., the person may file a 2nd petition under this subd.
1.
b.
only if at least 2 years have passed since he or she filed the first petition.
No person may file more than 2 petitions per record under this subd.
1.
b.
For a 2nd petition regarding the same record, the person shall pay to the clerk of circuit court a $100 fee.
SECTION 10.
973.015 (1m) (a) 3.
c.
and d.
and 4.
of the statutes are created to read:
973.015 (1m) (a) 3.
c.
A crime for which the maximum period of imprisonment is more than 6 years.
d.
A violation of chs.
341 to 348.
Page 7, line 2:
The court may order at the time of sentencing that the record is ineligible for expungement.
after “purposes" insert “or for purposes of the issuance of a license, as defined in s.
SECTION 11.
111.32 (10), by a licensing agency, as defined in s.
973.015 (1m) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
111.32 (11).
973.015 (1m) (b) A For purposes of par.
LRBa0108/1 - 2020 Legislature - 2 - MED&CMH:amn This subsection does not apply to the extent that its application conflicts with federal law.".
(a), a person has successfully completed the sentence if the person has completed all periods of incarceration, parole, or extended supervision to which he or she was sentenced;
the person has paid all fines, costs, fees, surcharges, and restitution assessed and has completed any court-ordered community service;
the person has not been convicted of a subsequent offense crime;
and, if on probation was imposed, the probation has not been revoked and the probationer has satisfied the conditions of probationn successful - 2020 Legislature - 6 - LRB-1690/1 CMH&MED:cdc SENATE BILL 39 SECTION 11 completion of the sentence involving incarceration or probation, the detaining or probationary authority shall issue and forward to the court of record a certificate of discharge which shall be forwarded to the court of record and which shall have the effect of expunging the record that indicates whether the person successfully completed his or her sentence.
If the court has ordered the record expunged under par.
(a) 1.
a.
or 2.
and the person has successfully completed the sentence, the person's record shall be expunged as ordered.
If the person has been imprisoned incarcerated, the detaining authority shall also forward a copy of the certificate of discharge to the department.
SECTION 12.
973.015 (1m) (c) of the statutes is created to read:
973.015 (1m) (c) Upon receipt of a petition under par.
(a) 1.
b., the district attorney shall make a reasonable attempt to notify the victim, as defined under s.
950.02 (4), of the petition.
In the notice, the district attorney shall inform the victim that he or she may waive the hearing requirement and that, if waived, the court may review the petition without a hearing.
The district attorney shall inform the victim of the manner in which he or she may provide written statements concerning the petition and, if the victim does not waive the hearing requirement, that he or she may appear at the hearing.
If the victim waives the hearing requirement, the district attorney may inform the court that there is no objection to waiving the hearing requirement.
Notwithstanding the confidentiality of victim address information obtained under s.
302.113 (9g) (g) 3., a district attorney who is required to make a reasonable attempt to notify a victim under this paragraph may obtain from the clerk of the circuit court the victim address information that the victim provided to the clerk under s.
302.113 (9g) (g) 3.
SECTION 13.
973.015 (4) of the statutes is created to read:
LRB-1690/1 - 2020 Legislature - 7 - CMH&MED:cdc SENATE BILL 39 S ECTION 13 973.015 (4) A record of a crime expunged under this section is not considered a conviction for employment purposes.
SECTION 14.0Initial applicability.
(1) This act first applies to any conviction for which sentencing has occurred but for which the record has not been ordered expunged on the effective date of this subsection.
SECTION 15.0Effective date.
(1) This act takes effect on the first day of the 13th month beginning after publicatio.
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senators Stroebel and Darling

  3. Representative Shankland added as a cosponsor

  4. Available for scheduling

  5. Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 4, Noes 1

  6. Report adoption of Senate Amendment 1 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0

  7. Executive action taken

  8. Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator Darling

  9. Fiscal estimate received

  10. Public hearing held

  11. Representative Neubauer added as a cosponsor

  12. Fiscal estimate received

  13. Fiscal estimate received

  14. Fiscal estimate received

  15. Representative Gruszynski added as a cosponsor

  16. Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety

  17. Introduced by Senators Darling, Risser, L. Taylor, Bernier, Carpenter, Feyen, Johnson, Larson, Olsen, Petrowski, Ringhand, Schachtner, Smith, Testin, Tiffany, Wanggaard and Wirch; cosponsored by Representatives Steffen, Goyke, Allen, Anderson, Billings, Bowen, Brooks, Brostoff, Cabrera, Considine, Crowley, Doyle, Edming, Felzkowski, Fields, Gundrum, Haywood, Hintz, Kerkman, Kolste, Krug, Kulp, Loudenbeck, Mursau, Myers, Novak, Nygren, Ohnstad, Petryk, Plumer, Pope, Pronschinske, Quinn, Ramthun, Riemer, Rohrkaste, Sargent, Schraa, Sinicki, Skowronski, Snyder, Sortwell, Spiros, Spreitzer, Stubbs, Subeck, Tauchen, C. Taylor, Thiesfeldt, Tittl, Vining, Vruwink, Zamarripa and Zimmerman

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

17 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 115 not signed on

Sponsors (17)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (115)

115 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 115 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Subjects

civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 39?
SB 39 is sponsored by Darling, Risser, L. Taylor, Bernier, Carpenter, Tim (Democrat), Feyen, Dan (Republican), Johnson, LaTonya (Democrat), Olsen, Petrowski, Ringhand, Schachtner, Testin, Patrick (Republican), Tiffany, Wirch, Robert (Democrat), Smith, Jeff (Democrat), Larson, Chris (Democrat), and Wanggaard, Van (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 39?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 39?
Track SB 39 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 39

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 39

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →