Ad valorem tax administration.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SF 69 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SF 69.
You're tracking SF 69
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SF 69 — Ad valorem tax administration.
Last action — S COW:S Did not consider for COW
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 General Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SF 69 on the official Wyoming source →Action History
-
S COW:S Did not consider for COW
-
S03 - Revenue:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 3-2-0-0-0
-
S Placed on General File
-
S Introduced and Referred to S03 - Revenue
-
S Received for Introduction
-
Bill Number Assigned
Sponsors
- Hallinan · Cosponsor
- Zwonitzer · Cosponsor
- Baldwin · Cosponsor
- Cale Case · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 89 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Cale Case Republican
Co-sponsors (3)
- Hallinan
- Zwonitzer
- Baldwin
Not signed on (89)
89 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 89 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| BALDWIN | — | Yea |
| JAMES | — | Nay |
| Cale Case | Republican | Yea |
| Stephan Pappas | Republican | Yea |
| Wendy Schuler | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SF 69?
- SF 69 is sponsored by Hallinan, Zwonitzer, Baldwin, and Cale Case (Republican).
- What is the current status of SF 69?
- This bill died with 2021 General Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SF 69?
- Track SF 69 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SF 69
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SF 69
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →