Relating to: sexual contact by a law enforcement officer with a person in his or her custody and providing ...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 104 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 104.
You're tracking SB 104
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 104 — Relating to: sexual contact by a law enforcement officer with a person in his or her custody and providing a penalty.
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
38 added · 17 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments made to Senate Bill 104 clarify the language regarding sexual conduct by law enforcement officers with individuals under their control. Instead of focusing solely on individuals "in custody," the bill now includes those who are "detained" by law enforcement officers. This change broadens the scope of the law to cover more situations where an officer's inappropriate conduct could occur, reinforcing protections for individuals in these vulnerable circumstances. This matters because it aims to hold law enforcement accountable and ensure a safer environment for all individuals they interact with.
- 2020 LEGISLATURE LRBa0454/1LRB-1531/1 MLJ:cjsMLJ:amn SENATE AMENDMENT 2, TO SENATE BILL 104 SeptemberMarch 24,15, 2019 - OfferedIntroduced by Senator.TAYLOR.Senators LT AYLOR, WANGGAARD , LEM AHIEU, SMITH and JACQUE , cosponsored by Representatives THIESFELDT, MYERS , NDERSON , M URSAU, C .TAYLOR , SPREITZER, SUBECK , FIELDS, SARGENT and Z AMARRIPA .
AtReferred theto locationsCommittee indicated,on amendJudiciary theand billPublic asSafety. follows:
1.A N A CT to create 940.225 (2) (k) of the statutes;
Pagerelating 1,to: line 2:
deletesexual “hiscontact by a law enforcement officer with a person in his or her"her custody and substituteproviding “detainmenta or".penalty.
2.Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau Under this bill, it is a Class C Felony for a law enforcement officer to have sexual contact or sexual intercourse with a person in his or her custody.
PageFor 2,the linepurposes 2:of the crime created in this bill, consent is not an issue.
deleteThe “,bill asadds definedthe prohibited conduct to the list of activities in s.current law that constitute second degree sexual assault.
165.85Current (2)law (c),".does not contain a criminal prohibition on sexual contact between a law enforcement officer and a person in his or her custody.
3.Under current law, a person may be required to register as a sex offender for certain crimes that are sexually motivated if the judge determines that it would be in the interest of public protection to have the person register.
PageUnder 2,this linebill, 3:the new offense of sexual contact between a law enforcement officer and a person in his or her custody would be subject to this provision.
deleteBecause “inthis hisbill creates a new crime or herrevises custody"a andpenalty substitutefor “whoan isexisting detainedcrime, bythe anyJoint lawReview enforcementCommittee officer,on asCriminal providedPenalties undermay s.be requested to prepare a report.
968.24,The orpeople isof in the custodystate of anyWisconsin, lawrepresented enforcementin officer".senate and assembly, do enact as follows:
4.- 2020 Legislature - 2 - LRB-1531/1 MLJ:amn SENATE BILL 104 SECTION 1 SECTION 1.
Page940.225 2,(2) line(k) 4:of the statutes is created to read:
before940.225 “custody"(2) insert(k) “detainmentIs or".a law enforcement officer, as defined in s.
5.165.85 (2) (c), and has sexual contact or sexual intercourse with any person in his or her custody.
PageThis 2,paragraph lineapplies 6:whether the custody is lawful or unlawful and whether the custody is actual or constructive.
afterConsent thatis linenot insert:an issue in an action under this paragraph.
“SECTION 2.
940.225 (5) (aj) of the statutes is created to read:
940.225 (5) (aj) “Law enforcement officer” has the meaning designated in s.
165.85 (2) (c).”.
View plain text versions (2)
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
- Amended Senate Amendment 2 pdf
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Representative Cabrera added as a cosponsor
-
Available for scheduling
-
Report passage as amended recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
-
Report adoption of Senate Amendment 2 recommended by Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, Ayes 5, Noes 0
-
Executive action taken
-
Senate Amendment 2 offered by Senator L. Taylor
-
Senate Amendment 1 offered by Senator L. Taylor
-
Public hearing held
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety
-
Introduced by Senators L. Taylor, Wanggaard, LeMahieu, Smith and Jacque; cosponsored by Representatives Thiesfeldt, Myers, Anderson, Mursau, C. Taylor, Spreitzer, Subeck, Fields, Sargent and Zamarripa
Sponsors
- L. Taylor · Primary
- Jeff Smith · Primary
- Devin LeMahieu · Primary
- Van Wanggaard · Primary
- André Jacque · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →5 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 127 not signed on
Sponsors (5)
- L. Taylor
- Smith, Jeff Democrat
- LeMahieu, Devin Republican
- Wanggaard, Van Republican
- Jacque, André Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (127)
127 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 127 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 104?
- SB 104 is sponsored by L. Taylor, Smith, Jeff (Democrat), LeMahieu, Devin (Republican), Wanggaard, Van (Republican), and Jacque, André (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 104?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 104?
- Track SB 104 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 104
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 104
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →