Wisconsin 2019-2020 Regular Session Status: In Committee 7 D cosponsors

AB 423 — Relating to: the duty of a member of the clergy to report child abuse.

Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

3 changes Share ↗

Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill expands the reporting obligations of clergy members regarding child abuse and removes the exception for confidential communications.

  • 48.981(2)(bm)1.

    if the member of the clergy has reasonable cause to suspect that a child seen by the member of the clergy in the course of his or her professional duties: a. Has been abused, as defined in s. 48.02 (1) (a) (b) to (f); or b. Has been threatened with abuse, as defined in s. 48.02 (1) (a) orto (f), and abuse of the child will likely occur. → if the member of the clergy has reasonable cause to suspect that a child seen by the member of the clergy in the course of his or her professional duties: a. Has been abused, as defined in s. 48.02 (1) (a) (b) to (f); or b. Has been threatened with abuse, as defined in s. 48.02 (1) (a) or (b) to (f), and abuse of the child will likely occur.

    This change clarifies that clergy must report any suspicion of child abuse, not just sexual abuse.

  • 48.981(2)(bm)2.

    if the member of the clergy has reasonable cause, based on observations made or information that he or she receives, to suspect that a member of the clergy has done any of the following: a. Abused a child, as defined in s. 48.02 (1) (a) or (b) to (f). b. Threatened a child with abuse, as defined in s. 48.02 (1) (a) or (b) to (f), and abuse of the child will likely occur. → if the member of the clergy has reasonable cause, based on observations made or information that he or she receives, to suspect that a member of the clergy has done any of the following: a. Abused a child, as defined in s. 48.02 (1) (a) or (b) to (f). b. Threatened a child with abuse, as defined in s. 48.02 (1) (a) or (b) to (f), and abuse of the child will likely occur.

    This change ensures clergy must report suspicions of abuse by other clergy members, extending the obligation beyond just sexual abuse.

  • 48.981(2)(bm)3.

    A member of the clergy is not required to report information relating to suspected or threatened sexual abuse of a child that he or she receives solely through confidential communications made to him or her privately or in a confessional setting if he or she is authorized to hear or is accustomed to hearing such communications and if, under the disciplines, tenets, or traditions of his or her religion, he or she has a duty or is expected to keep those communications secret.

    This repeal removes the exception that allows clergy to avoid reporting based on confidential communications.

Action History

  1. Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1

  2. Representative Haywood added as a coauthor

  3. Read first time and referred to Committee on Criminal Justice and Public Safety

  4. Introduced by Representatives C. Taylor, Sargent, Zamarripa, L. Myers, Vining, Gruszynski, Stubbs, Billings, Milroy, Subeck, Sinicki, Pope, Bowen, Vruwink, Crowley, Ohnstad and Emerson; cosponsored by Senators L. Taylor, Risser and Larson

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

17 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 115 not signed on

Sponsors (17)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (115)

115 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 115 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors AB 423?
AB 423 is sponsored by Sargent, Zamarripa, L. Myers, Gruszynski, Billings, Jill (Democrat), Milroy, Subeck, Lisa (Democrat), Sinicki, Christine (Democrat), Pope, Bowen, Vruwink, Crowley, Ohnstad, Emerson, Jodi (Democrat), Vining, Robyn (Democrat), Stubbs, Shelia (Democrat), and Taylor, Sequanna (Democrat).
What is the current status of AB 423?
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 423?
Track AB 423 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 423

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 423

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →