SB 5789 — Establishing additional uses for automated traffic safety cameras for traffic congestion reduction and increased safety.

S-5743.4SUBSTITUTES-1248.1SENATE SENATE BILL 5789State of Washington66th Legislature2020Legislature2019 Regular SessionBySenateSessionBySenators Transportation (originally sponsored by Senators Liias, Nguyen, Saldaña, and Wilson, C.)READC.Read FIRSTfirst TIMEtime 02/11/20.AN02/01/19.Referred to Committee on Transportation.AN ACT Relating to establishing additional uses for automated traffic safety cameras for traffic congestion reduction and increased safety;

and amending RCW 46.63.170;46.63.170.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:Sec.

adding a new section to chapter 46.68 RCW;

and providing an expiration date.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:Sec.

c 44 s 406 are each amended to read as follows:(1) The use of automated traffic safety cameras for issuance of notices of infraction is subject to the following requirements:(a) ((The))ExceptThe for proposed locations used solely for the pilot program purposes permitted under subsection (6) of this section, the appropriate local legislative authority must prepare an analysis of the locations within the jurisdiction where automated traffic safety cameras are proposed to be located:

Stoplight,Stoplight((,))violations; railroad crossing, or school speed zone violations;

((or))railroad speedcrossing(b) violationsExcept subjectas toprovided in (c) of this subsection;subsection, use of automated traffic safety cameras is restricted to the following locations only:

or(i) violationsIntersections includedof intwo subsectionarterials (6)with oftraffic thiscontrol sectionsignals forthat thehave durationyellow ofchange theinterval pilotdurations programin authorizedaccordance underwith subsectionRCW (6)47.36.022, which interval durations may not be reduced after placement of thisthe section.camera;

At(ii) amidblock minimum,on thearterials; local ordinance must contain the restrictions described in this section and provisions for public notice and signage.

Cities(iii) andrailroad countiescrossings; using automated traffic safety cameras before July 24, 2005, are subject to the restrictions described in this section, but are not required to enact an authorizing ordinance.

Beginning one year after June 7, 2012, cities and counties(((iii)))(iv) usingschool automatedspeed trafficzones.(c) safetyAny camerascity mustwest post an annual report of the numberCascade ofmountains trafficwith accidentsa thatpopulation occurredof atmore eachthan locationone wherehundred anninety-five automatedthousand traffic safety camera is located asin wella ascounty thewith numbera ofpopulation notices of infractionfewer issuedthan forone eachmillion camerafive andhundred anythousand othermay relevantoperate informationan about the automated traffic safety camerascamera thatto thedetect cityspeed orviolations countysubject deemsto appropriate on the city'sfollowing orlimitations:(i) county'sA webcity site.(b)may Exceptonly asoperate providedone insuch (c) of this subsection and subsection (6) of this section, use of automated traffic safety camerascamera iswithin restrictedits torespective thejurisdiction; following locations only:

(i) Intersections of two or more arterials with traffic control signals that have yellow change interval durations in accordance with RCW 47.36.022, which interval durations may not be reduced after placement of the camera;

(ii) railroad crossings;

and (iii) school speed zones.(c) Any city west of the Cascade mountains with a population of more than one hundred ninety-five thousand located in a county with a population of fewer than one million five hundred thousand may operate an automated traffic safety camera to detect speed violations subject to the following limitations:(i) A city may only operate one such automated traffic safety camera within its respective jurisdiction;

If appropriate under the circumstances, a renter identified under subsection (3)(a) of this section is responsible for an infraction.(g) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images,images or any other personally identifying data prepared under this section are for the exclusive use of law enforcement in the discharge of duties under this section and are not open to the public and may not be used in a court in a pending action or proceeding unless the action or proceeding relates to a violation under this section.

No photograph, microphotograph, or electronic image,image or any other personally identifying data may be used for any purpose other than enforcement of violations under this section nor retained longer than necessary to enforce this section.(h) All locations where an automated traffic safety camera is used must be clearly marked at least thirty days prior to activation of the camera by placing signs in locations that clearly indicate to a driver that he or she is entering a zone where traffic laws are enforced by an automated traffic safety camera.

Signs placed in automated traffic safety camera locations after June 7, 2012, must follow the specifications and guidelines under the manual of uniform traffic control devices for streets and highways as adopted by the department of transportation under chapter 47.36 RCW.(i) If a county or city has established an authorized automated traffic safety camera program under this section, the compensation paid to the manufacturer or vendor of the equipment used must be based only upon the value of the equipment and services provided or rendered in support of the system, and may not be based upon a portion of the fine or civil penalty imposed or the revenue generated by the equipment.(2)equipment.(j) InfractionsAs detectedused throughin thethis usesubsection of(1), automated"public traffictransportation safetyvehicle" camerasmeans areany notmotor partvehicle, streetcar, train, trolley vehicle, ferry boat, or any other device, vessel, or vehicle that is owned or operated by a transit authority or an entity providing service on behalf of thea registeredtransit owner'sauthority drivingthat recordis underused RCWfor 46.52.101the purpose of carrying passengers and 46.52.120.that operates on established routes.

"Transit authority" has the meaning provided in RCW 9.91.025.(2) Infractions detected through the use of automated traffic safety cameras are not part of the registered owner's driving record under RCW 46.52.101 and 46.52.120.

((The))ExceptThe as provided otherwise in subsection (6) of this section, the amount of the fine issued for an infraction generated through the use of an automated traffic safety camera shall not exceed the amount of a fine issued for other parking infractions within the jurisdiction.

or(c) In lieu of identifying the vehicle operator, the rental car business may pay the applicable penalty.Timely mailing of this statement to the issuing law enforcement agency relieves a rental car business of any liability under this chapter for the notice of infraction.(4) Nothing in this section prohibits a law enforcement officer from issuing a notice of traffic infraction to a person in control of a vehicle at the time a violation occurs under RCW 46.63.030(1) (a), (b), or (c).(5)(a)(c).(5) For the purposes of this section, "automated traffic safety camera" means a device that uses a vehicle sensor installed to work in conjunction with an intersection traffic control system, a railroad grade crossing control system, or a speed measuring device, and a camera synchronized to automatically record one or more sequenced photographs, microphotographs, or electronic images of the rear of a motor vehicle at the time the vehicle fails to stop when facing a steady red traffic control signal or an activated railroad grade crossing control signal, or exceeds a speed limit as detected by a speed measuring device.(b)device.(((6) ForDuring the purposes2011-2013 ofand the2013-2015 pilotfiscal programbiennia, authorizedthis undersection subsectiondoes (6)not ofapply thisto section,automated "automated traffic safety camera"cameras alsofor includesthe apurposes deviceof usedsection to216(5), detectchapter stopping367, atLaws intersectionof or2011 crosswalkand violations;section 216(6), chapter 306, Laws of 2013.))--- END ---

stopping when traffic obstructed violations;

public transportation only lane violations;

and stopping or traveling in restricted lane violations.

The device, including all technology defined under "automated traffic safety camera," must not reveal the face of the driver or the passengers in vehicles, and must not use any facial recognition technology in real time or after capturing any information.

If the face of any individual in a crosswalk or otherwise within the frame is incidentally captured, it may not be made available to the public nor used for any purpose including, but not limited to, any law enforcement action, except in a pending action or proceeding related to a violation under this section.(6) ((During the 2011-2013 and 2013-2015 fiscal biennia, this section does not apply to automated traffic safety cameras for the purposes of section 216(5), chapter 367, Laws of 2011 and section 216(6), chapter 306, Laws of 2013.))(a)(i) A city with a population greater than five hundred thousand may adopt an ordinance creating a pilot program authorizing automated traffic safety cameras to be used to detect one or more of the following violations:

Stopping when traffic obstructed violations;

stopping at intersection or crosswalk violations;

public transportation only lane violations;

and stopping or traveling in restricted lane violations.

Under the pilot program, stopping at intersection or crosswalk violations may only be enforced at the twenty intersections where the city would most like to address safety concerns related to stopping at intersection or crosswalk violations.

At a minimum, the local ordinance must contain the restrictions described in this section and provisions for public notice and signage.(ii) Except where specifically exempted, all of the rules and restrictions applicable to the use of automated traffic safety cameras in this section apply to the use of automated traffic safety cameras in the pilot program established in this subsection (6).(iii) As used in this subsection (6), "public transportation vehicle" means any motor vehicle, streetcar, train, trolley vehicle, ferry boat, or any other device, vessel, or vehicle that is owned or operated by a transit authority or an entity providing service on behalf of a transit authority that is used for the purpose of carrying passengers and that operates on established routes.

"Transit authority" has the meaning provided in RCW 9.91.025.(b) Use of automated traffic safety cameras as authorized in this subsection (6) is restricted to the following locations only:

Locations authorized in subsection (1)(b) of this section;

and midblock on arterials.

Additionally, the use of automated traffic safety cameras as authorized in this subsection (6) is further limited to the following:(i) The portion of state and local roadways in downtown areas of the city used for office and commercial activities, as well as retail shopping and support services, and that may include mixed residential uses;(ii) The portion of state and local roadways in areas in the city within one-half mile north of the boundary of the area described in (b)(i) of this subsection;(iii) Portions of roadway systems in the city that travel into and out of (b)(ii) of this subsection that are designated by the Washington state department of transportation as noninterstate freeways for up to four miles;

and(iv) Portions of roadway systems in the city connected to the portions of the noninterstate freeways identified in (b)(iii) of this subsection that are designated by the Washington state department of transportation as arterial roadways for up to one mile from the intersection of the arterial roadway and the noninterstate freeway.(c) However, automated traffic safety cameras may not be used on an on-ramp to an interstate.(d) From the effective date of this section through December 31, 2020, a warning notice with no penalty must be issued to the registered owner of the vehicle for a violation generated through the use of an automated traffic safety camera authorized in this subsection (6).

Beginning January 1, 2021, a notice of infraction must be issued, in a manner consistent with subsections (1)(e) and (3) of this section, for a violation generated through the use of an automated traffic safety camera authorized in this subsection (6).

However, the penalty for the violation may not exceed seventy-five dollars.(e) For infractions issued as authorized in this subsection (6), a city with a pilot program shall remit monthly to the state fifty percent of the noninterest money received under this subsection (6) in excess of the cost to install, operate, and maintain the automated traffic safety cameras for use in the pilot program.

Money remitted under this subsection to the state treasurer shall be deposited in the Cooper Jones active transportation safety account created in section 2 of this act.

The remaining fifty percent retained by the city must be used only for improvements to transportation that support equitable access and mobility for persons with disabilities.(f) A transit authority may not take disciplinary action, regarding a warning or infraction issued pursuant to this subsection (6), against an employee who was operating a public transportation vehicle at the time the violation that was the basis of the warning or infraction was detected.(g) A city that implements a pilot program under this subsection (6) must provide a preliminary report to the transportation committees of the legislature by June 30, 2022, and a final report by January 1, 2023, on the pilot program that includes the locations chosen for the automated traffic safety cameras used in the pilot program, the number of warnings and traffic infractions issued under the pilot program, the number of traffic infractions issued with respect to vehicles registered outside of the county in which the city is located, the infrastructure improvements made using the penalty moneys as required under (e) of this subsection, an equity analysis that includes any disproportionate impacts, safety, and on-time performance statistics related to the impact on driver behavior of the use of automated traffic safety cameras in the pilot program, and any recommendations on the use of automated traffic safety cameras to enforce the violations that these cameras were authorized to detect under the pilot program.NEW SECTION.  Sec.