SJR 7 — Preserving the Separation of Powers Amendment
Last action — Rejected by Senate (Roll No. 71)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
29 added · 27 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill SJR 7 has changed the proposed amendment's name from “Preserving the Separation of Powers Amendment” to “Restoring Separation of Powers Amendment.” Additionally, it emphasizes nullifying a previous Supreme Court decision to strengthen the principle that courts should not interfere with legislative proceedings. This change is significant because it clarifies the legislative intent to reinforce the separation of powers, potentially limiting judicial involvement in legislative matters and influencing how state governance operates.
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS IntroducedSJR7 VersionSUB1 « Senate Joint Resolution 7 History OTHER VERSIONS — CommitteeIntroduced SubstituteVersion (1) | | Email Key:
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session IntroducedCommittee Substitute for Senate Joint Resolution 7 By Senators TrumpTrump, Rucker, Azinger, Cline, Maynard, and RuckerJeffries [Introducedoriginal Januarysponsors 21,[Originating 2020;in the Committee on the Judiciary;
referredreported on January 30, 2020] Proposing an amendment to the CommitteeConstitution onof the Judiciary;State of West Virginia, amending section one, article V thereof, relating to providing that courts have no authority by mandamus, prohibition, contempt, or otherwise to interfere with the proceedings of the Legislature;
andrestoring then to the Committeeconstitutional onprinciple Finance]giving Proposinglife an amendment to the Constitutionseparation of thepowers Stateas ofarticulated Westin Virginia,Syllabus amendingPoint section3 one,of articlethe Vdecision thereof,of relatingthe toWest providingVirginia thatSupreme courtsCourt haveof noAppeals authorityin by mandamus, prohibition, contempt, or otherwise to interfere with the proceedingscase of theState Legislature;ex rel.
Holmes v.
Clawges, 226 W.
Va.
479, 702 S.E.2d 611;
and nullifying Syllabus Point 3 of the decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals in the case of State ex rel.
Workman v.
Carmichael, 241 W.
Va.105, 819 S.E.2d 251 (2018);
The legislative, executiveexecutive, and judicial departments shall be separate and distinct, so that neither shall exercise the powers properly belonging to either of the others;
The courts of this state have no authority by mandamus, prohibition, contemptcontempt, or otherwise to interfere with the proceedings of either house of the Legislature;
1” and designated as the “Preserving“Restoring the Separation of Powers Amendment” and the purpose of the proposed amendment is summarized as follows: “To clarifynullify thatthe courtsdecision areof withoutthe authoritySupreme toCourt interfereof withAppeals proceedingsin the case of theState Legislature”.ex rel.
NOTE:Workman v.
TheCarmichael, purpose241 ofW. this resolution is to offer to the voters a constitution amendment designated the “Preserving the Separation of Powers Amendment” that would clarify that courts are without authority to interfere with proceedings of the Legislature.
Strike-throughsVa.105, indicate819 languageS.E.2d that251 would(2018), berestoring strickenthe fromconstitutional aprinciple headingof orseparation theof presentpowers lawthat andcourts underscoringare indicateswithout newauthority languageto thatinterfere wouldwith bethe added.proceedings of the Legislature”.
Bill Status | Bill Tracking | Legacy WV Code | Bulletin Board | District Maps | Senate Roster | House Roster | Live | Blog | Jobs | Links | Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute Committee Substitute (1) Current html
- Introduced Introduced Version html
Action History
-
Rejected by Senate (Roll No. 71)
-
Read 3rd time
-
Laid over on 3rd reading 2/4/20
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 1st reading
-
2nd reference dispensed
-
Committee substitute reported, but first to Finance
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Judiciary then Finance
-
Filed for introduction
Sponsors
- Trump · Primary
- Maynard · Cosponsor
- Patricia Rucker · Cosponsor
- Cline · Cosponsor
- Mike Azinger · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Trump
Co-sponsors (4)
- Maynard
- Patricia Rucker Republican
- Cline
- Mike Azinger Republican
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SJR 7?
- SJR 7 is sponsored by Trump, Maynard, Patricia Rucker (Republican), Cline, and Mike Azinger (Republican).
- What is the current status of SJR 7?
- This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SJR 7?
- Track SJR 7 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SJR 7
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SJR 7
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →