West Virginia 2020 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 2 R cosponsors

SJR 7 — Preserving the Separation of Powers Amendment

Last action — Rejected by Senate (Roll No. 71)

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

29 added · 27 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill SJR 7 has changed the proposed amendment's name from “Preserving the Separation of Powers Amendment” to “Restoring Separation of Powers Amendment.” Additionally, it emphasizes nullifying a previous Supreme Court decision to strengthen the principle that courts should not interfere with legislative proceedings. This change is significant because it clarifies the legislative intent to reinforce the separation of powers, potentially limiting judicial involvement in legislative matters and influencing how state governance operates.

→
Previous
Latest
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS Introduced Version « Senate Joint Resolution 7 History OTHER VERSIONS  —  Committee Substitute (1)  |   |  Email Key:
NEWS RELEASES HELPFUL LINKS SJR7 SUB1 « Senate Joint Resolution 7 History OTHER VERSIONS  —  Introduced Version  |   |  Email Key:
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session Introduced Senate Joint Resolution 7 By Senators Trump and Rucker [Introduced January 21, 2020;
Red = new code to be enacted WEST virginia legislature regular session Committee Substitute for Senate Joint Resolution 7 Senators Trump, Rucker, Azinger, Cline, Maynard, and Jeffries original sponsors [Originating in the Committee on the Judiciary;
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary;
reported on January 30, 2020]     Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of West Virginia, amending section one, article V thereof, relating to providing that courts have no authority by mandamus, prohibition, contempt, or otherwise to interfere with the proceedings of the Legislature;
and then to the Committee on Finance] Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of West Virginia, amending section one, article V thereof, relating to providing that courts have no authority by mandamus, prohibition, contempt, or otherwise to interfere with the proceedings of the Legislature;
restoring the constitutional principle giving life to the separation of powers as articulated in Syllabus Point 3 of the decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals in the case of State ex rel.
Holmes v.
Clawges, 226 W.
Va.
479, 702 S.E.2d 611;
and nullifying Syllabus Point 3 of the decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals in the case of State ex rel.
Workman v.
Carmichael, 241 W.
Va.105, 819 S.E.2d 251 (2018);
The legislative, executive and judicial departments shall be separate and distinct, so that neither shall exercise the powers properly belonging to either of the others;
The legislative, executive, and judicial departments shall be separate and distinct, so that neither shall exercise the powers properly belonging to either of the others;
The courts of this state have no authority by mandamus, prohibition, contempt or otherwise to interfere with the proceedings of either house of the Legislature;
The courts of this state have no authority by mandamus, prohibition, contempt, or otherwise to interfere with the proceedings of either house of the Legislature;
1” and designated as the “Preserving the Separation of Powers Amendment” and the purpose of the proposed amendment is summarized as follows:  “To clarify that courts are without authority to interfere with proceedings of the Legislature”.
1” and designated as the “Restoring the Separation of Powers Amendment” and the purpose of the proposed amendment is summarized as follows:  “To nullify the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals in the case of State ex rel.
NOTE:
Workman v.
The purpose of this resolution is to offer to the voters a constitution amendment designated the “Preserving the Separation of Powers Amendment” that would clarify that courts are without authority to interfere with proceedings of the Legislature.
Carmichael, 241 W.
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
Va.105, 819 S.E.2d 251 (2018), restoring the constitutional principle of separation of powers that courts are without authority to interfere with the proceedings of the Legislature”.
Bill Status  |  Bill Tracking  |  Legacy WV Code  |  Bulletin Board  |  District Maps  |  Senate Roster  |  House Roster  |  Live  |  Blog  |  Jobs  |  Links  |  Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
  Bill Status  |  Bill Tracking  |  Legacy WV Code  |  Bulletin Board  |  District Maps  |  Senate Roster  |  House Roster  |  Live  |  Blog  |  Jobs  |  Links  |  Home This Web site is maintained by the West Virginia Legislature's Office of Reference & Information.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Rejected by Senate (Roll No. 71)

  2. Read 3rd time

  3. Laid over on 3rd reading 2/4/20

  4. On 3rd reading

  5. Read 2nd time

  6. On 2nd reading

  7. Read 1st time

  8. On 1st reading

  9. 2nd reference dispensed

  10. Committee substitute reported, but first to Finance

  11. To Judiciary

  12. Introduced in Senate

  13. To Judiciary then Finance

  14. Filed for introduction

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Trump

Co-sponsors (4)

Not signed on (147)

147 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 147 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SJR 7?
SJR 7 is sponsored by Trump, Maynard, Patricia Rucker (Republican), Cline, and Mike Azinger (Republican).
What is the current status of SJR 7?
This bill died with 2020 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SJR 7?
Track SJR 7 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SJR 7

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SJR 7

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →