SF 9 — Certification of cases to state board of equalization.
Last action — Assigned Chapter Number
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 01, 2016. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
AN ACT relating to the state board of equalization; authorizing certification of cases directly to the board from county boards of equalization; providing rulemaking authority; and providing for an effective date.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SF 9 on the official Wyoming source →Action History
-
Assigned Chapter Number
-
Governor Signed SEA No. 0008
-
Speaker Signed SEA No. 0008
-
President Signed SEA No. 0008
-
Assigned Number SEA No. 0008
-
Concur:Passed 28-1-1-0-0
-
Received for Concurrence
-
3rd Reading:Passed 56-4-0-0-0
-
2nd Reading:Passed
-
COW:Passed
-
Placed on General File
-
H03 - Revenue:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 9-0-0-0-0
-
Introduced and Referred to H03 - Revenue
-
Received for Introduction
-
3rd Reading:Passed 28-0-2-0-0
-
2nd Reading:Passed
-
COW:Passed
-
Placed on General File
-
S03 - Revenue:Recommend Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0
-
Introduced and Referred to S03 - Revenue
-
Received for Introduction
-
Bill Number Assigned
Sponsors
- Joint Revenue Interim Committee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 92 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Joint Revenue Interim Committee
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (92)
92 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 92 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kinskey | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Recommend Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0 ROLL CALL | — | Not Voting |
| Ellis | — | Yea |
| Cale Case | Republican | Yea |
| Jacob Wasserburger | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Recommend Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0 ROLL CALL | — | Not Voting |
| Ellis | — | Yea |
| Kinskey | — | Yea |
| Cale Case | Republican | Yea |
| Jacob Wasserburger | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Recommend Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0 ROLL CALL | — | Not Voting |
| Ellis | — | Yea |
| Kinskey | — | Yea |
| Cale Case | Republican | Yea |
| Jacob Wasserburger | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kinskey | — | Yea |
| Ellis | — | Yea |
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Recommend Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0 ROLL CALL | — | Not Voting |
| Cale Case | Republican | Yea |
| Jacob Wasserburger | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Peterson | — | Yea |
| Recommend Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0 ROLL CALL | — | Not Voting |
| Ellis | — | Yea |
| Kinskey | — | Yea |
| Cale Case | Republican | Yea |
| Jacob Wasserburger | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SF 9 do?
- AN ACT relating to the state board of equalization; authorizing certification of cases directly to the board from county boards of equalization; providing rulemaking authority; and providing for an effective date.
- Who sponsors SF 9?
- SF 9 is sponsored by Joint Revenue Interim Committee.
- What is the current status of SF 9?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 01, 2016. Enacted.
- Where can I track SF 9?
- Track SF 9 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SF 9
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SF 9
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →