Va. Telephone Privacy Protection Act; joint liability of seller & telephone solicitor for violation.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 2600 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 2600.
You're tracking HB 2600
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 2600 — Va. Telephone Privacy Protection Act; joint liability of seller & telephone solicitor for violation.
Last action — Approved by Governor-Chapter 256 (effective 7/1/19)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2019. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Provides that a telephone solicitor and the seller on whose behalf or for whose benefit a telephone solicitation call offering or advertising a seller's property, goods, or services is made or initiated are jointly and severally liable for violations of the Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act (§ 59.1-510 et seq.). The measure establishes a presumption that a telephone solicitation call offering or advertising a seller's property, goods, or services is made or initiated on behalf of or for the benefit of the seller and provides that this presumption may be rebutted if it is shown by clear and convincing evidence that (i) the seller did not retain or request the telephone solicitor to make telephone solicitation calls on the seller's behalf or for the seller's benefit and (ii) such telephone solicitation calls were made by the telephone solicitor without the seller's knowledge or consent. The measure removes a provision that authorized the Commissioner of the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services to inquire into possible violations of the Act and contains technical amendments. This bill is identical to
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
21 added · 22 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to HB 2600 clarify the Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act by specifying the conditions under which a seller and a telephone solicitor can be jointly liable for unsolicited calls. The bill now emphasizes that both parties can be held responsible unless the seller can prove they had no involvement or knowledge of the solicitation. This adjustment is significant because it strengthens consumer protections against unwanted telemarketing calls, making it easier for individuals to seek legal action if they receive such calls.
SESSION history | hilite | pdf | print version VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- CHAPTER 256 An Act to amend and reenact §§ 59.1-510, 59.1-515, 59.1-516, and 59.1-517 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding a section numbered 59.1-514.1, relating to the Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act;
[H 2600] Approved March 8, 2019 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
"Responsible person" means either or both of a (i) a telephone solicitor or (ii) a seller if the telephone solicitation call offering or advertising the seller's property, goods, or services is presumed to have been made or initiated on behalf of or for the benefit of the seller and the presumption is not rebutted as provided in subsection B of § 59.1-514.1.
View plain text versions (4)
- Governor: Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0256) View text Current html March 08, 2019
- House: Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB2600ER) View text html February 19, 2019
- Committee Substitute House: Committee substitute printed 19106295D-H1 html January 31, 2019
- House: Presented and ordered printed 19102586D View text html January 09, 2019
Action History
-
Approved by Governor-Chapter 256 (effective 7/1/19)
-
Governor's Action Deadline Midnight, March 26, 2019
-
Enrolled Bill communicated to Governor on February 21, 2019
-
Signed by President
-
Signed by Speaker
-
Enrolled
-
Read third time
-
Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor
-
Constitutional reading dispensed
-
Read third time and passed House (98-Y 1-N)
-
Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB2600H1
-
Committee substitute agreed to 19106295D-H1
-
Read second time
-
Read first time
-
Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor
-
Presented and ordered printed 19102586D
Sponsors
- John J. Bell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Black | — | Yea |
| Chafin | — | Yea |
| Dance | — | Yea |
| Carrico | — | Yea |
| McClellan | — | Yea |
| Spruill | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Barker, George L. | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Chase, Amanda F. | — | Yea |
| Cosgrove, John A., Jr. | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Dunnavant, Siobhan S. | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Howell, Janet D. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| Jeremy S. McPike | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| Mason, T. Montgomery "Monty" | — | Yea |
| Newman, Stephen D. | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Ruff, Frank M., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Vogel, Jill Holtzman | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Black | — | Yea |
| Carrico | — | Yea |
| Dance | — | Yea |
| McClellan | — | Yea |
| Chafin | — | Yea |
| Spruill | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Barbara A. Favola | — | Yea |
| Barker, George L. | — | Yea |
| Bill DeSteph | — | Yea |
| Bryce E. Reeves | — | Yea |
| Chase, Amanda F. | — | Yea |
| Cosgrove, John A., Jr. | — | Yea |
| David R. Suetterlein | — | Yea |
| David W. Marsden | — | Yea |
| Dunnavant, Siobhan S. | — | Yea |
| Ebbin, Adam P. | — | Yea |
| Edwards, John S. | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Hanger, Emmett W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Howell, Janet D. | — | Yea |
| Jennifer B. Boysko | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Lewis, Lynwood W., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Mamie E. Locke | — | Yea |
| Mark D. Obenshain | — | Yea |
| Mark J. Peake | — | Yea |
| Mason, T. Montgomery "Monty" | — | Yea |
| Newman, Stephen D. | — | Yea |
| Norment, Thomas K., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Petersen, J. Chapman | — | Yea |
| R. Creigh Deeds | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Ruff, Frank M., Jr. | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
| Saslaw, Richard L. | — | Yea |
| Scott A. Surovell | — | Yea |
| Vogel, Jill Holtzman | — | Yea |
| William M. Stanley, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Black | — | Yea |
| Chafin | — | Yea |
| Cosgrove | — | Yea |
| Dance | — | Yea |
| Newman | — | Yea |
| Norment | — | Yea |
| Saslaw | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Spruill | — | Yea |
| Glen H. Sturtevant, Jr. | — | Yea |
| L. Louise Lucas | — | Yea |
| Richard H. Stuart | — | Yea |
| Ryan T. McDougle | — | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 11% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Keam | — | Yea |
| Lindsey | — | Yea |
| Marshall | — | Yea |
| Bell, Robert B. | — | Yea |
| Bourne | — | Yea |
| Byron | — | Nay |
| Filler-Corn | — | Yea |
| Heretick | — | Yea |
| Kory | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Ransone | — | Yea |
| Toscano | — | Yea |
| Yancey | — | Yea |
| Christopher T. Head | — | Yea |
| Lamont Bagby | — | Yea |
| Michael J. Webert | — | Yea |
| R. Lee Ware | — | Yea |
| Terry G. Kilgore | — | Yea |
| Tony O. Wilt | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 2600 do?
- Provides that a telephone solicitor and the seller on whose behalf or for whose benefit a telephone solicitation call offering or advertising a seller's property, goods, or services is made or initiated are jointly and severally liable for violations of the Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act (§ 59.1-510 et seq.). The measure establishes a presumption that a telephone solicitation call offering or advertising a seller's property, goods, or services is made or initiated on behalf of or for the benefit of the seller and provides that this presumption may be rebutted if it is shown by clear and convincing evidence that (i) the seller did not retain or request the telephone solicitor to make telephone solicitation calls on the seller's behalf or for the seller's benefit and (ii) such telephone solicitation calls were made by the telephone solicitor without the seller's knowledge or consent. The measure removes a provision that authorized the Commissioner of the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services to inquire into possible violations of the Act and contains technical amendments. This bill is identical to
- Who sponsors HB 2600?
- HB 2600 is sponsored by Bell, John J..
- What is the current status of HB 2600?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 09, 2019. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 2600?
- Track HB 2600 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 2600
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 2600
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →