Relating to: University of Wisconsin System resident undergraduate tuition. (FE)
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 369 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 369.
You're tracking AB 369
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 369 — Relating to: University of Wisconsin System resident undergraduate tuition. (FE)
Last action — Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Bill Text View text Current pdf
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill establishes limits on increases to resident undergraduate tuition at the University of Wisconsin System, tying increases to the consumer price index and ensuring tuition remains constant for students based on their enrollment period.
-
36.27(1)(a)
Subject to par. (b) and sub. (1m), the board may establish for different classes of students differing tuition and fees incidental to enrollment in educational programs or use of facilities in the system.
The bill introduces a new condition that links the establishment of tuition to subsection (1m).
-
36.27
36.27 (1m) RESIDENT UNDERGRADUATE TUITION. (a) In this subsection: 1. “Consumer price index” means the consumer price index for all urban consumers, U.S. city average, as determined by the U.S. department of labor. 2. “Resident undergraduate tuition” includes any differential tuition charged to a resident undergraduate.
The bill creates a new section defining resident undergraduate tuition and the consumer price index.
-
36.27(1m)
Beginning in the 2021-22 academic year, the Board of Regents may not increase resident undergraduate tuition by more than the percentage increase in the consumer price index for the previous year.
The bill limits tuition increases to the rate of inflation based on the consumer price index.
-
36.27(1m)
For a student who first enrolls in a college campus or university in the 2021-22 academic year or thereafter, the amount of resident undergraduate tuition charged to the student for the first year of enrollment is subject to par. (b) and shall remain constant while the student continues his or her enrollment in the college campus or university, or for 4 consecutive academic years, whichever is less.
The bill establishes a tuition freeze for new students for their first year and for a maximum of four years.
-
36.27(1m)
For a student who continues his or her enrollment in a college campus or university in the 2021-22 academic year, the amount of resident undergraduate tuition charged to the student for the 2021-22 academic year is subject to par. (b) and shall remain constant while the student continues his or her enrollment in the college campus or university, or through the 2024-25 academic year, whichever is less.
The bill provides a tuition freeze for continuing students based on their enrollment status until 2024-25.
Action History
-
Failed to pass pursuant to Senate Joint Resolution 1
-
Representative Skowronski added as a coauthor
-
Representative Allen added as a coauthor
-
Representative Tusler added as a coauthor
-
Fiscal estimate received
-
Read first time and referred to Committee on Consumer Protection
-
Introduced by Representatives Murphy, Pronschinske, Kerkman, Felzkowski, Ramthun, Zimmerman and Knodl; cosponsored by Senator Jacque
Sponsors
- David Murphy · Primary
- Treig Pronschinske · Primary
- Kerkman · Primary
- Mary Felzkowski · Primary
- Ramthun · Primary
- Shannon Zimmerman · Primary
- Daniel Knodl · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →7 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 125 not signed on
Sponsors (7)
- Murphy, David Republican
- Pronschinske, Treig Republican
- Kerkman
- Felzkowski, Mary Republican
- Ramthun
- Zimmerman, Shannon Republican
- Knodl, Daniel Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (125)
125 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 125 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors AB 369?
- AB 369 is sponsored by Murphy, David (Republican), Pronschinske, Treig (Republican), Kerkman, Felzkowski, Mary (Republican), Ramthun, Zimmerman, Shannon (Republican), and Knodl, Daniel (Republican).
- What is the current status of AB 369?
- This bill died with 2019-2020 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 369?
- Track AB 369 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 369
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 369
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →