Water project repayment.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SF 103 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SF 103.
You're tracking SF 103
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SF 103 — Water project repayment.
Last action — COW:Failed 13-46-1-0-0
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2017. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
AN ACT relating to water development; providing that the commission shall require repayment of funds expended for water studies as specified; and providing for an effective date.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SF 103 on the official Wyoming source →Action History
-
COW:Failed 13-46-1-0-0
-
Placed on General File
-
H05 - Agriculture:Recommend Do Pass 9-0-0-0-0
-
Introduced and Referred to H05 - Agriculture
-
Received for Introduction
-
3rd Reading:Passed 28-1-1-0-0
-
2nd Reading:Passed
-
COW:Passed
-
Placed on General File
-
S05 - Agriculture:Recommend Amend and Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0
-
Introduced and Referred to S05 - Agriculture
-
Received for Introduction
-
Bill Number Assigned
Sponsors
- Larry Hicks · Primary
- Moniz · Primary
- Hastert · Primary
- Blake · Primary
- Meier · Primary
- Ogden Driskill · Primary
- McKim · Primary
- Paxton · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →8 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 85 not signed on
Sponsors (8)
- Larry Hicks Republican
- Moniz
- Hastert
- Blake
- Meier
- Ogden Driskill Republican
- McKim
- Paxton
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (85)
85 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 85 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Meier | — | Yea |
| Barnard | — | Yea |
| Emerich | — | Yea |
| Recommend Amend | — | Not Voting |
| Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0 ROLL CALL | — | Not Voting |
| Moniz | — | Yea |
| Larry Hicks | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Recommend Amend | — | Not Voting |
| Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0 ROLL CALL | — | Not Voting |
| Barnard | — | Yea |
| Emerich | — | Yea |
| Meier | — | Yea |
| Moniz | — | Yea |
| Larry Hicks | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Barnard | — | Yea |
| Meier | — | Yea |
| Recommend Amend | — | Not Voting |
| Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0 ROLL CALL | — | Not Voting |
| Emerich | — | Yea |
| Moniz | — | Yea |
| Larry Hicks | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Barnard | — | Yea |
| Meier | — | Yea |
| Recommend Amend | — | Not Voting |
| Do Pass 5-0-0-0-0 ROLL CALL | — | Not Voting |
| Emerich | — | Yea |
| Moniz | — | Yea |
| Larry Hicks | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SF 103 do?
- AN ACT relating to water development; providing that the commission shall require repayment of funds expended for water studies as specified; and providing for an effective date.
- Who sponsors SF 103?
- SF 103 is sponsored by Larry Hicks (Republican), Moniz, Hastert, Blake, Meier, Ogden Driskill (Republican), McKim, and Paxton.
- What is the current status of SF 103?
- This bill died with 2017. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SF 103?
- Track SF 103 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SF 103
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SF 103
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →